Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New evidence implicates Westerfield: (Dusek Fires Final Shot?) Trial Thread, July 10, 2002
Union Trib ^ | July 10, 2002 | Steve Perez/Greg Magnus

Posted on 07/09/2002 8:35:39 PM PDT by FresnoDA

New evidence implicates Westerfield

By Steve Perez
and
Greg Magnus
SIGNONSANDIEGO

July 9, 2002

A police specialist says she linked 46 fibers from four locations in David Westerfield's motor home, in every way she could measure, to 19 blue fibers found in the sheet that was used to wrap the body of Danielle van Dam, recovered in East County.

The witness, Tanya DuLaney, criminalist with the San Diego Police Department, was called Tuesday as the defense presented its case because she offered new prosecution evidence.

DuLaney testified she recovered 46 fibers from four locations in the motor home that Westerfield took on a weekend trip the same weekend that the 7-year-old victim disappeared.

"I was specifically looking for types of fibers we had seen in the case; primarily I was looking for orange acrylic fibers and blue nylon fibers," DuLaney said. "And I found a number of blue nylon fibers on tape lifts from the various areas of the upholstery fabric in the motor home."

They match 19 blue fibers found in the sheet that was used to wrap the victim's body recovered in East County.

"In all the ways I measured and compared the fibers, the fibers from the motor home were the same as the fibers found on the sheet," DuLaney said.

DuLaney testified on June 24 that hairs found in the shower drain in Westerfield's motor home could be Danielle's. Other hairs were found in a lint ball in his trash, among his laundry, on pillow cases and in the motor home sink.

Under cross-examination, DuLaney said she did not use all the tests at her disposal on all the fibers. She said time constraints reduced the number of fibers she was able to examine using an infrared spectrometer.

She said her laboratory does not use a melting-point test on the fibers because it would destroy the evidence and thus not allow a retest at a later date.

Dulaney testified she examined and inspected all the 46 of the fibers, but only 14 of them under infrared light.

Feldman repeatedly sought to ask DuLaney about her "testing" of the fibers, only to be interrupted by prosecution objections to his "vague" questions.

DuLaney said the fibers ultimately may have shared a common source, but conceded there was a possibility they did not.

Jennifer Shen, another SDPD criminalist, went on to describe how she found orange acrylic fibers on a towel in Westerfield's SUV and the interior of the SUV that were similar to a fiber found on the victim's necklace.

Shen said she found 12 fibers in the SUV's interior: one on the front passenger seat; four on the rear passenger arm rest and seven on the back seat area.

She said two of the fibers were excluded as having a common source, but that a representative sample of the 12 was similar to fibers found in Westerfield's home and on the victim's body.

Defense witnesses

The testimony aboput fibers followed a morning in which defense witnesses testified that Westerfield may not have been the man who argued with a Silver Strand beach volunteer over payment of money.

Officer Mark Tallman, a San Diego police officer, was sent to the Silver Strand around 9:25 a.m. on Feb. 5 to see if anyone there had seen David Westerfield or Danielle van Dam.

Westerfield is a 50-year-old twice-divorced design engineer who is accused of abducting the 7-year-old girl from her house, killing her and dumping her nude body off Dehesa Road east of El Cajon. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Westerfield, who they believe is sexually attracted to young girls

Tallman was one of a number of witnesses called by the defense in an effort to contradict testimony of prosecution witnesses call in the case.

The officer's testimony could call into question the testimony of Donald Raymond, a volunteer at Silver Strand State Beach. Raymond testified June 13 that he saw Westerfield pull out his wallet on Feb. 2 during a dispute over whether he paid too much money to camp there. (Westerfield had told police he left the beach that afternoon after realizing he'd left his wallet back in Poway.)

The officer, the first to contact Raymond, testified that the man was initially unsure it was Westerfield.

Cross-examined by prosecutor Jeff Dusek, the officer (whose face was not shown on television for security reasons) said Raymond did provide information that led officers to witnesses who testified about seeing Westerfield's motor home parked at the Strand with the curtains drawn.

The officer also testified that he was told of only one camper overpaying that weekend for staying at the park.

Tallman was the first witness called to testify at the resumption of the trial, now in its 19th day.

The trial had been scheduled to resume with cross-examination today of a security guard who said she saw David Westerfield drive into Coronado Cays a day after Danielle disappeared.

On Monday, Heather Mack said Westerfield drove his motor home into the exclusive neighborhood in the afternoon or evening hours of Feb. 3.

Mack's testimony was delayed because she was late arriving

More testimony

Westerfield smiled and waved at her as he drove past her security kiosk, but she never saw him again, Mack testified.

Such a recollection would provide Westerfield with corroboration of his statement to police that he spent the evening there, after being unable to arrive at Silver Strand State Park before its gates closed for the evening.

Mack, under cross-examination yesterday by Dusek, testified that she originally told a police officer that she ``vaguely remembered'' seeing Westerfield's RV.

Dusek began his session today by resuming his attack on Mack's credibilty, She testified that security guards need only pass a written test to qualify for employment. Mack passed such a test four years ago.

She was unable to provide Dusek with a precise time that Westerfield drove through. She also testified that, though it was the job of security guards to patrol the Cays and call authorities if motor homes parked illegally, she rarely contacted them.

"It depends if my supervisor tells me," she said.

Her account also conflicted with Westerfield's own statement to investigators. Mack testified yesterday she saw Westerfield drive up to the Cays entrance from the south, as if he were coming from Imperial Beach. Westerfield told police he entered the development while heading east from the Strand.

Other delays

Mack's tardiness was not the only cause of a delay in trial proceedings on Tuesday.

The testimony of a San Diego police detective who took the witness stand was halted after a dispute arose over taped witness interviews.

Detective Frank Gerbac had just taken the stand when defense attorney Robert Boyce asked about an interview of Denise Kemal – a friend of Brenda van Dam – conducted the evening after Danielle van Dam was discovered missing.

Dusek objected, leading to a lengthy sidebar huddle between the attorneys and Superior Court Judge William Mudd.

After the jury was excused, Mudd said prosecution and defense copies of transcripts of four taped police interviews may or may not have inconsistencies. Attorneys were ordered to resolve them and call Gerbac to the stand later.

Police witnesses

Another police officer, Michael Fisher Sr., testified briefly about a lengthy interview he did with Kemal, one of the visitors to the van Dam residence during the early morning hours before the victim was reported missing Feb. 2.

Defense attorneys appeared to call him primarily to show that Kemal wasn't initially truthful to investigators, telling them at first that she was certain that Damon van Dam did not come downstairs during her visit.

During her testimony, Kemal recalled Mr. van Dam did come downstairs.

On cross-examination by Dusek, the officer said Kemal appeared "unsure" about whether or not that occurred.

Another police employee was recalled by the defense. Jeffrey Graham Jr., the latent print examiner who confirmed for authorities that a palm print found inside Westerfield's motor home was the victim's, testified about a prints found in and arond the van Dam residence.

He told defense attorneys that he could find no prints matching the defendant's, including one found on drywall Danielle van Dam's bedroom door.

Motor home left near park

A woman who lived briefly with David Westerfield testified she saw the defendant's motor home left unlocked and parked by a neighborhood park, down the street from his home.

Christina Gonzales is the daughter of the defendant's ex-girlfriend who moved in around the fall of 2000, in an effort to escape an abusive relationship.

The work, the precise nature of which the witness was unable to recall, was performed on the motor home about two years ago, Gonzales testified. During the work, she and her mother would walk back and forth from Westerfield's residence, she testified under questioning by defense attorney Robert Boyce.

At least one child was playing in the park with a parent, she recalled.

Though the inference was that neighborhood children had access to the unlocked vehicle, Gonzales told Dusek under cross-examination that she never saw strange children inside the motor home.

She also did not dispute, under Dusek's questioning, that Westerfield's pattern for using the motor home consisted of leaving it parked in front of his home for a period of time before and after trips, in order to load and clean the vehicle.

"I don't know how long the whole process took," she said. "I would just take my belongings out, help clean up the refrigerator, that kind of thing."

Westerfield was not seen loading or unloading the vehicle outside his residence the night before Danielle van Dam disappeared.

She also testified, under more questioning by Dusek, that he normally took his trailer carrying assorted "sand toys," when embarking on desert trips. Westerfield did not take the vehicles during his rambling trip to Glamis on the weekend the victim disappeared.

She also testified that the only dog seen in his residence was a "little curly haired black dog," and that the defendant's son, Neal, was only a part-time residence of the household.

No witnesses Thursday.

Judge Mudd told jurors that they may begin an expected week-long trial break as early as the conclusion of testimony on Wednesday.

Mudd that all available witnesses could be called by then.

"I'm completely confident that you'll be able to go to work on Thursday," he said.

The trial will not be held during the week of July 15 because of a previously planned vacation by the judge.

Mudd also urged the members of the panel to avoid any media coverage of the trial."

"Continue to avoid at all costs, synopsis shows, call-in programs, reading the articles," he said. "It's the only way we're going to be able to get a verdict from 12 individuals that hear and see the evidence in this coutroom."

Among defense witnesses yet to testify is insect expert David Faulkner.

Faulkner is expected to testify about how long the 7-year-old's body may have been left alongside Dehesa Road before a volunteer searcher found the remains among some trash Feb. 27. Defense attorney Steven Feldman has said Westerfield would have had no opportunity to dispose of the body because he was under constant police surveillance from Feb. 4 until his arrest Feb. 22.

alt
Defendant David Westerfield(L) consults defense attorney Steven Feldman during Westerfield's murder trial in San Diego July 9, 2002. Dozens of fibers taken from Westerfield's motorhome match those found on a sheet used to wrap the body of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam according to testimony by a San Diego police forensic scientist. Westerfield faces the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping van Dam from her Sabre Springs, California home and then murdering her last February. (Dan Trevan/Reuters)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,001-1,018 next last
To: RnMomof7; All
anyone notice that "Valtrex" is a big advertiser on CourtTV... Valtrex, as I understand it, is supposed to be a control/cure for the symptoms of genital herpes....

Now, is it a big stretch for me to conclude that CourtTV just might have a motive to downplay the unpleasant consquences of profilgate sex, so as to make advertising the "cure/control" for such an unpleasant consquence of rampant sex with whoever, so unendlingly profitable?

Oh, how devious the media just might be... Does BVD have a major position, position- wise, or stock-wise, in Valtrex? Would we ever be told? Doubtful! (Maybe dear BVD will become the spokewoman for Valtrex, a tidy contract assuring her the mortgage payment on the new 850,000 hut in Carmel)

Could CourtTV be trusted to tell us the whole truth and nothing but, concerning the best way to avoid having to pay some drug company for the rest of our "sexually-active" lives to be free of annoying symptoms... I really and seriously doubt it....
681 posted on 07/10/2002 12:58:39 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I have tried many times, and I can't get it up. The San Diego Channel -live broadcast of the DW trial, that is.
682 posted on 07/10/2002 12:59:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Me, too. I hadn't seen anyone else comment on this obvious court bias, yet I've noticed this being a constant & daily occurence since the beginning of the trial.

No wonder Westerfield appears 'down in the dumps' so many times. I would be too! Hell's bells, I'd probably be in major trouble with the court, because I'd be screaming "Bias!" each time in happened to my attorney.

Well, the jury is sitting nearest to Dusek & his sarcasm & yelling when cross examiming of defense witnesses could put them into a coma.......easily! LOL!
683 posted on 07/10/2002 12:59:59 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
It also seems to me that he gives the prosecution alot more leeway in cross than he allowed the defense. For example
Feldman "Obejection, facts not in evidence"
Judge "OVERRULED"
Dusek "Objection, facts not in evidence"
Judge "Sustained"

684 posted on 07/10/2002 1:00:29 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
HOW THE HECK DID I MISS THAT?

You got post 666

You are today's winner.

685 posted on 07/10/2002 1:00:47 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
LOL! I'm surprised they don't fly an American flag in the background. "Freedom! It's the American way!"
686 posted on 07/10/2002 1:01:15 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, you don't know much about "drinking problems" apparently. Most people who have them don't believe they have them. Others around them who do believe they have them try to "save them" from themselves. The drinkers tend to resent that. Indeed, no amount of "saving" will work until the drinker him/herself begins to believe they have a problem--and more important--that they want to confront it and do something about it. They can be forced to go to treatment, led to water as it were, but no one can force them to give up drinking if they are unwilling.

This has broken up many couples, friends, and families. It does not in any way indicate that this lovely woman broke up with him because he's a murderer.
687 posted on 07/10/2002 1:01:27 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry if this was already discussed...I missed the first hour of the trial this morning (and therefor a little of this thread.) Rick Roberts and River just said that David VanDam has filed motions with the court to be allowed back into the courtroom. Dusek and Feldman are supposed to argue on this motion tomorrow...if I heard correctly. Anyone have anymore info on this?
688 posted on 07/10/2002 1:01:48 PM PDT by Mrs.O'Strategery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
CONGRATULATIONS...YOU ARE THE VD THREAD Mark of the Beast WINNER FOR TODAY....666!!!

To: Rheo

Thanks hunny! Coupla questions...
What is the import of the black boot testimony?

666 posted on 7/10/02 12:51 PM Pacific by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


Major ritual "sabbat" date on the Occult/Witchcraft/Satanism calendar.

This date sticks out....February 2, 2002    Danielle Van Dam, Age 7

DATE: February 2 NAME: IMBOLIC; IMBOK; CANDLEMAS; OIMELE; LADY DAY; BRIGID DAY WITCHCRAFT: Sexual rituals; Celtic triple goddess Brigid honored. SATANISM: Sexual rituals, human


689 posted on 07/10/2002 1:02:58 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Um, that happened once or twice when the ex-brother in law was in court the first couple of days sitting behind the defendant. Oooops.
690 posted on 07/10/2002 1:03:27 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: gigi
"It also seems to me that he gives the prosecution alot more leeway in cross than he allowed the defense. For example
Feldman "Obejection, facts not in evidence"
Judge "OVERRULED"
Dusek "Objection, facts not in evidence"
Judge "Sustained"


EXACTLY my point!!!
691 posted on 07/10/2002 1:03:52 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Gee, there must be some mistake. I don't see my name on there, and the last time I heard, they thought I might have already won. ;)
692 posted on 07/10/2002 1:04:21 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Omigosh! I got post 666 on Monday, too! Anybody seen my lint brush and my bleach?
693 posted on 07/10/2002 1:04:53 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
GREAT MINDS...T.A.....
694 posted on 07/10/2002 1:04:55 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.O'Strategery
just said that David VanDam has filed motions with the court to be allowed back into the courtroom.

AND in other news, BRENDA is relaxing in her NEW $850,000 home, with her NEW BMW in the DRIVEWAY.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?????

695 posted on 07/10/2002 1:05:18 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Trial resumes at 4:30 Eastern, 1:30 Pacific. If it's okay with Rheo (who may be suffering from carpal tunnel with all the typing she's done!), do you think you could start off? I might be back toward the end of the day to help out again, but I can't promise.

A blessing on your head!

696 posted on 07/10/2002 1:05:19 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Tell me you ARE NOT GOING to Boston.....Duh-Knees is there you know...
697 posted on 07/10/2002 1:05:59 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/grantorgrantee/search_detail.asp?txtFormInput=VanDAm++Brenda&PageNo=1&DocNo=2002-139362

nothing yet at the recoder's site...
698 posted on 07/10/2002 1:07:00 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
[Dusek is going to look stupid] going to.......?

Dusek is doing the best he can with what he has.
Pfingst was the problem with this case, again in my opinion.

This is not only case the SD DA is prosecuting or the only case the SD PD is investigating. There ARE budgets these people have to work within. And there are other cases. Investigating to the level of detail some of us on these threads seem to expect, is just not practicable, in my opinion.

And on the other hand the Van Dams. I don't believe they killed their own daughter. (or perhaps I don't want to believe that.) As much as I personally loathe their proclavities and disgusting activities, and as much as I personally am convinced they were (and perhaps still are) fairly neglectful of their children, I don't believe they had a direct hand in Danielle's death. As to the other "pizza partiers", I haven't thought much about them.

My own opinions on David Alan Westerfield.
David Westerfield does indeed have evidence against him. He was the suspect. The SD PD are obligated to follow up on investigative leads. When things are rushed and hurried, as they are during a missing child search, mistakes and ASSUMPTIONS are going to be made. The extent of those mistakes in some cases makes me somewhat disturbed. The appearing and disappearing towels is bothersome. (I've heard of throwdown guns, perhaps there is such a thing as throwdown evidence but I have no idea if that's the case here .) There are other parts of some of the physical evidence that, in my own opinion, has questionable chain of custody considerations and in some cases (the blood) wonder if questions about profession miscoduct might be in order. Again, that's my own opinion, YMMV.

More speculation on my part below. I have NOTHING to substantiate or base the following on other than gut instinct.

Why was David Alan Westerfield focused on ?
I really have to wonder if it was Brenda Van Dam who was REJECTED by David Westerfield at Dad's on February 1, 2002. Brenda had been turned down by Ryan and LePage's daughter (Ryan was official boyfriend for the night)) (forgot her name for the moment while writing this).) I have to wonder if Brenda being turned down by David Westerfield fueled a bit of revenge and "get eveness" in Brenda and she turned her worry, fear and anger about Danielle into a swipe in the form of an accusation at David Westerfield on February 2, 2002. Again, this is pure speculation on my part. This may have focuse the SD PD on David Alan Westerfield.

At this point in time, I am inclined to think David Alan Westerfield is innocent. As far as his drinking, I suspect it is partly because of his early life. He was rejected by his parents when he was 18. Some of us had to fend for ourselves much much younger and we didn't end up being a suspect in a murder trial or end up with drug or alcohol problems. I suspect like most of us, David Westerfield has spent most of his life trying to belong to something that was taken away when he was younger. In his case, he never succeeded. Drinking can make one quite introspective. There are some of us who should not be crossed when we do go those those places in our own minds to be introspective. In fact, dare I say it, some of us don't desire others tromping blindly about inside our heads trying to second guess our thoughts.

I suspect someone else entirely took Danielle either from inside her home or outside of her home in the early morning hours of February 2, 2002. From the unIDed finger and palm prints on the sliding glass doors, I am leaning towards an abduction from inside the Van Dam home and Danielle may have been unconscious or dead and removed in a blue blanket slung over someone's back like a sack. Beyond, the above, I won't even guess.
699 posted on 07/10/2002 1:07:29 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
It seems that so far, the real evidence consists of similar very short nylon blue-gray fibers from an unknown source and which appear to be a very common color/fiber type. Does anyone know if the SDPD wears 'blue uniforms' which are more of a 'steel blue'? If so they could be the source of the blue-gray fibers.

Who handled the sheet in which the body of Danielle was placed prior to putting Danielle's body in it, and did those who recover the body take appropriate care to insure the sheet was not contaminated and taken from a sealed container of some sort? Also, why were there far more fibers on the sheet holding the body of Danielle than on Danielle's body (I think I recall that only one fiber was found on her body)? One would think that far more fibers would have been 'stuck' and remained stuck as her body dried out in the dry climate.

If DW did kill Danielle and he was followed beginning the next day, I have a hard time believing that there would still be loose fibers that would so easily fall off her body and onto a sheet. I assume the desert does get windy and the wind would have blown most of the fibers that were there.

Another question to be asked is how did Danielle's body get to her location after the site was searched and DW was being followed and in jail? Inquiring minds want to know!

I remain unconvinced that the fibers are actually nylon, and if they are, they most likely came from a car floormat that could possibly be tied to Damon's blue van that he sold shortly after Danielles disappearance. This would also explain how 'similar fibers' ended up in DW's house if Brenda was driving Danielle around to sell GS cookies, assuming they came from the same source.

If I were Feldman, I would check to make sure the fibers weren't actually polyester, unless the prosecutor is going to claim the fibers came from the MH sheets and comforter. If Dusek makes this assertion, Feldman would be in a bit of a quandry because if the fibers are actually polyester, the prosecutor would have a much better case as it relates to the fiber evidence. Strategy-wise, maybe it is better to just not mention that the sheets/comforter could not have been nylon and if DW is convicted, to raise that fact as new evidence which would warrant a new trial. TO raise it now might give the prosecutor an opportunity to do a more detailed analysis of the fibers. The problem for the prosecutor in that case is it would look bad that they screwed up the first tests, and if the fibers are polyester, there are many, many clothes made with polyester and the fibers would match a huge number of blue fibers found in garments that surely must be in the closets of vitually every person in the United States.

Chances are excellent that DW has garments with blue/blue-grey polyester fibers. Police uniforms, if a combination of a few shades of blue/blue-grey would almost certainly have polyester fibers in some combination with possibly other fibers such as cotton or wool (remember it was winter when Danielle disappeared. If the fibers are actually polyester and Feldman can produce garments worn by DW that are made with blue polyester, especially shirts (remember that fibers were found on MH headboard); his leaning back against the headboard while watching TV or engaging in some 'adult activities' with a girlfriend would be a reasonable explanation s to why the fibers were on the headboard.

700 posted on 07/10/2002 1:07:33 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,001-1,018 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson