Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New evidence implicates Westerfield: (Dusek Fires Final Shot?) Trial Thread, July 10, 2002
Union Trib ^ | July 10, 2002 | Steve Perez/Greg Magnus

Posted on 07/09/2002 8:35:39 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,001-1,018 next last
To: Rheo
When did they impound the MH?
221 posted on 07/10/2002 8:10:45 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Great song parody - I love that real song too.
222 posted on 07/10/2002 8:10:56 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Do you sleep? LOL
223 posted on 07/10/2002 8:12:41 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: All
About the blue paint on Danielle's nails - I'm thinking it probably is nail polish - from the way Shen (I think it was her) said that she just "left it on" the nails - like it wasn't flaky - or under the nails - but on them. Why can't they just come right out and tell us these things though - so we don't drive ourselves nuts thinking.
224 posted on 07/10/2002 8:14:56 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I think the ten day break is mistrial stuff

I said the same thing to my daughter last night. She agreed. It seems very wrong and unjust.

A man's life is on the line here. If this judge scheduled his vacation long ago (as claimed), maybe the case should have been assigned to a different person.

225 posted on 07/10/2002 8:16:11 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
I know it was in the impound lot on 2/8...not sure exact date it was put there.

I know Annette Peer was in the MH on 2/5..on 2/6 she was in there gathering blood evidence w/Karen LaCalia?.

Tanya Dulaney was in there on 2/6 gathering hair and fiber.

226 posted on 07/10/2002 8:18:22 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I suspect most woman swingers are lesbians..that is encouraged in the "lifestyle"..the husbands like to watch...to get their jollies..so you could be right..
227 posted on 07/10/2002 8:18:33 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Oh, that can't be possible. It's not in Miss Manners' Book of Police Procedural Etiquette to plant false evidence. There are police procedural experts here who will attest to that. (/sarcasm)
228 posted on 07/10/2002 8:20:30 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
what do you make of these mysterious towels on the floor appearances?

At the least it means the "crime scene" was contaminated and all that "evidence "of fibers and hairs and blood need to be excluded...IMHO

We have no idea who may have been in there and transfered or planted evidence

229 posted on 07/10/2002 8:22:10 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Ok....going over my Tanya's notes again....need to confirm all dates she was in there as my notes show she mentions blue towel outside bathroom floor and green towel in hallway.....so the 2/4-2/13 may only be 2/4-2/6 for towels to appear.
230 posted on 07/10/2002 8:23:23 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Didn't the Dry cleaner testify that she never saw a blood spot on his jacket and she looked? Or maybe it was in a report??

Anyone remember?
231 posted on 07/10/2002 8:25:58 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Why did none of Danielle's hair turn up on the fabric headboard yet 11 blue fibers did?
232 posted on 07/10/2002 8:27:32 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
LOL That's impressive! ...and it was a perfectly good song that I may never think the same thing about it again... :)
233 posted on 07/10/2002 8:27:57 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Yes, Julie Mills testified that she did not see any blood on the jacket....not sure if she really looked at it.
234 posted on 07/10/2002 8:29:12 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
I read this as "I picked up my nose" not hose.. LOL
235 posted on 07/10/2002 8:29:47 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
They said on O Reilly that a mistrial can only be declared on that IF they can prove that one of the jurors listened to the TV or read press reports. As O Reilly noted how can the help it. it is all over that area.

This trial should be turned over to another judge

I believe I read or heard he told the jurors that they could go to "work" next week..just imagine the contamination there....

Incredible..

Every Juror should be told they will have to sign a paper under oath verifying they did not break the order of the court..a lie would be subject to prosecution .

Then do it!

236 posted on 07/10/2002 8:30:52 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Thanks, I'll go back and read her testimony. I missed it live.
237 posted on 07/10/2002 8:33:52 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: All
Why would a carpet fiber sample only be submitted from Danielle's room?

Why not the rest of the VD house..He had to walk thru the house and up the stairs and in the hallway..spending more time on that carpet than in her room actually....so why not submit a house sample in hopes that that fiber would show up in his stuff?

238 posted on 07/10/2002 8:35:41 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Very good Krodg.........Towel, shell casing.......what else might be found on the floor/s after initial evidence gathering?
239 posted on 07/10/2002 8:37:48 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Every Juror should be told they will have to sign a paper under oath verifying they did not break the order of the court..a lie would be subject to prosecution .

Boy, I agree. It's nearly impossible for jurors to not be influenced and then days pass while they may be making decisions or drawing conclusions based on media, not trial facts. Very bothersome !!!!!!

240 posted on 07/10/2002 8:47:21 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,001-1,018 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson