Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 841-846 next last
Comment #441 Removed by Moderator
To: one_particular_harbour
That's all I ask. Thanks.
To: one_particular_harbour
"What's for breakfast?"
"Mutton, honey!"
To: agrandis
Copy, over and out!
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I've never really agreed with Southetc. political views, but I have had some pleasant Freep mail exchanges with her in the distant past, and I have to say I'm disappointed in some of her posts to you today. I'm a little embarrassed for her, actually.
To: kristinn
I think a poster with a radio show who posts that he intends to go to the press conference to ask questions for his radio show is availing himself of said activity being parodied. It's the FR radio show, for goodness' sake! So now you want to parody FR radio?
Why don't the rest of us parody the DC Chapter's activities? Would you think that was fair game?
446
posted on
07/09/2002 9:24:20 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: agrandis
I'm not trying to get smarty, here, but that single question (the first question I ask above) alone seems to incite further curiosity, doesn't it? I would love to get back to you regarding ROn Brown, if I do get a chance (I'll be travelling for a week starting in about 4 hours, so it will be iffy).I'll be very patient about all of the details, but before you go, just tell me:
Exactly who are you claiming shot Ron Brown?
447
posted on
07/09/2002 9:24:58 PM PDT
by
ned
To: Sub-Driver
Larry Klayman and Terry McAuliffe. Is there any difference between the two? Genuine scum of the earth.
448
posted on
07/09/2002 9:25:06 PM PDT
by
CdMGuy
To: pgkdan
Larry Klayman is an idiot.You stole my line. You can't do that. I guess I will have to Trademark it.
To: agrandis
;)
To: Amelia
Some of your crowd have already in more or less ways, done that.
To: Jhoffa_
I was just joking.
There is a difference between speaking your mind and bashing IMHO. You have legitimate complaints (may not always agree) and you speak your mind AFTER reading what was said. The AFTER is the key word that separates the two in my mind.
Have been on threads that people start bashing about an entirely different thing then the thread is about and when asked to start their own thread, you get called the Gestapo! Now those folks I classify as Bush Bashers!
To: A Citizen Reporter
453
posted on
07/09/2002 9:26:38 PM PDT
by
deport
To: agrandis
Yeah, well she was also implying in her posts that I am not good-looking enough to get a date or to be datable.
To: PhiKapMom
Fair Enough..
455
posted on
07/09/2002 9:28:48 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Again, you speak as if you have authority on who I really am, when in fact, it is obvious that you have no clue.I beg your pardon. You have asked me not to post to you and I have obliged. However, I will not continue to do so, if you post to me.
The post you referenced with your comment above was not addressed to you, nor did it mention anything about you.
If you saw yourself in a particular description, that's your problem. You need to deal with it and not trail off into some nonsense drivel like the above quote.
To: ned
ned, check the archives. You'll find so much Ron Brown you'll be oozing it out your ears after a minimal search. Or start a Ron Brown thread, that would work too.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Why don't you grab your broom and go join howling on another thread. Just a suggestion of course.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I think I just heard the world's smallest violin.
To: agrandis
"Americans now tolerate official corruption, as long as their favorite Party is at the helm."Could you please point me in the direction of a bit of "official corruption" by the Bush administration uncovered by JW?
"I like the fact that they dion't give a damn that most Americans hate them because they are not partisan."
Do you believe that it's purely coincidental that while Clinton was in office, all of Larry's lawsuits and press releases pointed to criminal and/or unethical behavior by the Democrats, and now he's done a complete reversal?
There isn't a single press release in the Judicial Watch site critical of anything that Daschle and the Democrats have done since Bush took office.
Coincidence? Or calculated fund-raising tactics...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson