Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: leadership lacking
Times Herald Record Online ^ | July 9, 2002 | Nathan Hegedus

Posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:05 AM PDT by Quilla

Middletown – Sen. Hillary Clinton said yesterday during an appearance at Middletown's Paramount Theatre that neither the Bush administration nor the Securities and Exchange Commission has "shown much leadership" during recent corporate accounting scandals.

"I don't think it is adequate to just say there are some bad people and that we're going to go after them," she said. "People depend upon our market to be transparent."

She did not, however, specifically call for the resignation of SEC chief Harvey Pitt.

Clinton pointed to the origin of current rules during the Great Depression and said the laws need to be updated for the global and Internet economy of the 21st century.

"We need to go further than enforcing the laws that we've got because I don't think the laws are necessarily adequate," she said. "Human nature hasn't changed in 60 or 70 years. It hasn't changed in a million years. We have got to stay ahead of all those natural impulses people have to take advantage of each other."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bush; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Quilla
......all those natural impulses people have to take advantage of each other."

You know about those impulses first hand, don't you, Hillary?

21 posted on 07/09/2002 10:05:36 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Even though New York is the liberal capital of the U.S., I still believed New York voters would have seen through all the lies, corruption and self-serving interests to defeat her. It scares me to think what would happen if she clawed her way to the Democrat nomination and made a run for the WH. I can see it all now............the dregs of American society rallying by her side shouting, "It's for the children, the poor, the disadvantaged, the minorities..." the same crock of Democrat rhetoric that elected that scumbag husband of hers, the Kennedy's, Carter and such illustrious wannabes like Daschle and Gore.
22 posted on 07/09/2002 10:14:50 AM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
Once I read Saul Alynsky, the current Democrat mindset(which is really a radical mindset) is so clear, easy to spot, and one can easily anticipate exactly what they will do in response to any situation. If the minority morons in the senate are capable of reading(since they frequently vote on bills they admit they never even read), they should read that book until they can at least retain 20% of it's content.
23 posted on 07/09/2002 10:18:17 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Hillary's problem -- that will stick with her for life -- is that she is percieved by 100% of America, both liberals and conservatives, both supporters and foes, as an ultra-partisan politician.

People view her each and every utterance on ANY topic through the prism of partisan squabbling. Therefore, people tend to disregard her statements like this one.

Conversely, Bush's STRONG suit, is his BI-partisanship, which he has tenaciously stuck to. When Bush gets mad at something, people's ears perk up because he so rarely criticizes anyone. He has mastered the art of saving his ammo till he sees the whites of their eyes. As time has gone by, I've learned to appreciate that more and more.

24 posted on 07/09/2002 10:25:28 AM PDT by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

25 posted on 07/09/2002 10:43:49 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Too bad we all can't have insider information like you did, sweety.
26 posted on 07/09/2002 10:53:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

27 posted on 07/09/2002 11:01:58 AM PDT by LuigiBasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Hillary's Apocalypse Rouses Partisan Yapping

H.A.R.P.Y.

28 posted on 07/09/2002 11:17:31 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"The Bride of Beelzebubba."
29 posted on 07/13/2002 8:07:09 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
her transparent cattle future scandal

Was Soros in on that at all?

30 posted on 12/08/2003 7:21:04 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I think you're on to something! Check this out:

Records and reports of federal regulators show a Chicago-based commodity trading firm, LFG, did not keep proper records and did not conduct "due diligence", an industry term meaning accurately determining who exactly are, in fact, their clients and where they actually are located. [The full title of the firm is since about 1999, REFCO-LFG Division, 111 W. Jackson Blvd.,17th floor, Chicago IL 60604; (312) 441-6000. REFCO started out as an obscure cattle-trading firm, Arkansas and elsewhere, and became a giant futures trading firm based in Chicago. They reportedly "bought" early in her career Hillary Rodham Clinton by arranging a hundred thousand dollar "profit" on a few dollar transaction. They have repeatedly somehow escaped full scrutiny and punishment in a variety of scandals; the silver scandal of the early 1980s; the soybean and currency scandals in Chicago of 1989-1992, where a number of "no clout" small fry were sent to prison including the "Soybean Ten". REFCO is reportedly a trading front for international financial pirate George Soros who shares corrupt deals with the Rothschilds such as the attack on the British Pound Sterling and the Bank of England, a few years ago. Critics allege REFCO "owns" the federal regulators.

Source: RED CHINA and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

31 posted on 12/09/2003 5:33:21 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
So who as a favor would assist Soros in directing attacks at Bush?
32 posted on 12/09/2003 6:00:00 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
My questions is...when is Karl Rove going to open the ball on her? She's has enough bags that he must be having trouble finding where to start.
33 posted on 12/09/2003 6:35:14 AM PST by VANHALEN2002 (10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VANHALEN2002
I'm sure Rove knows all about keeping his powder dry :) In any case, I suspect that there a lot of folks who don't want to see another Toon in office. Not Pubbies necessarily, just decent Americans who also believe in keeping their powder dry. And who have plenty of informational ammo.

In other words, after her decision to run, le deluge.

34 posted on 12/09/2003 6:40:37 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson