Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Live - Speech on Corporate Responsibilty
MSNBC

Posted on 07/09/2002 8:38:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Says Fraudulent CEOs Should Lose All Compensation


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481-496 next last
To: Miss Marple
The President gave a strong speech. We know full well that CNN is going to rip him apart - which bill schneider, jeff greenfield, john king and aaron brown are doing right now. This is no surprise. There are two themes: Bush is dishonest about Harken and has no moral credibility - He didn't go far enough like the democrats. Aaron Brown was very unhappy when Lou Dobbs pointed out that most voters blame clinton, not Bush. He frowned and replied, "Well, clinton won't be on the ballot in November." He was pissed and did not want clinton brought into this at all.

greenfield going on and on about Bush's business ethics. Says this will now haunt him and will not end. So much for objectivity and fairness, right. Same old, same old.

181 posted on 07/09/2002 9:28:11 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Yes, Brit Hume was talking to the Fox All-Stars last night about just that.

The form announcing the intent to sell was filed properly, and on time.

The paperwork confirming the sale is what was late.

182 posted on 07/09/2002 9:29:03 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
He said it was anti-capitalism and too much of what the Democrats wanted. He was complaining about W's use of the the wording "excessive profits" and he doesn't like "independent Boards of Directors." Rush has to get a clue.
183 posted on 07/09/2002 9:29:11 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
what is Rush upset about in this speech?

Bush: "The lure of heady profits of the late 1990s spawned abuses..." In other words, profits lead to corruptions. Rush argument: Bush should have said, Unethical people lead to financial corruption, not profits. It gives the Demos an issue a way to attack Bush and the GOP.

184 posted on 07/09/2002 9:29:54 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
and he doesn't like "independent Boards of Directors." Rush has to get a clue.

Right Rush, boards should beholden to the CEO.... I'm LMAO, at Maha Rushie

185 posted on 07/09/2002 9:30:14 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Greenfield at large is a pluperfect ass. His TV show dumped
just like that ultra fat ass he sits on daily...a loser/liar
perfect for CNN.
186 posted on 07/09/2002 9:30:22 AM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Dales
BTW, in case you missed his press conference yesterday, the very FIRST time this Harken deal was brought forward, when Bush entered politics for the first time, he waived his attorney-client privilege so the SEC could get to the bottom of it.
187 posted on 07/09/2002 9:30:33 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Wphile; Miss Marple; Howlin; hchutch; rintense; Mo1; Ragtime Cowgirl
Here is a candid photo of Da$$hole listening to President Bush's speech:

HE DID IT TO ME AGAIN! I CAN'T WIN EVEN WITH THE NY SLIMES, DC COMPOST, LA SLIMES and CNNNBCCBSABCCNBC LYING 24/7 FOR OUR CAUSE!

188 posted on 07/09/2002 9:31:12 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Proving to me once again that he has lost his understanding of anything political. There are people who scam the Wall Street system. To deny it is foolish and plays into Rat hands.

Perhaps Rush sits on a board or two and doesn't want to give up his seat.

189 posted on 07/09/2002 9:31:25 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Here is question

Did Harkin pull a stunt like Enron or Globel Crossing and rip off the shareholders ..

190 posted on 07/09/2002 9:31:29 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Bush sold on June 30, 1990. He sold shares that had been issued to him valued at 2.50/share. During the SEC investigation George W Bush waived his attorney client privilege so that the SEC could question his attorneys and Harkens attorneys.

The SEC stated that he had no insider knowledge.

Here's the chart of Harkens stock in the relevat time period. Note he sold about midway in a down cycle. Had he held the stock he could have doubled his money. Whoever bought it did. Contrast this with Clinton, McCaulliffe, Mrs Daschle and Mrs Bingaman not to mention Rubin and the dot.com swindlers.


191 posted on 07/09/2002 9:32:00 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Thanks for sacrificing....watching CNN so the rest of us don't have to. It's time to hold the media accountable for the continuing efforts to destroy our President. I don't know how...but they aren't responsible enough to handle that mighty microphone they wield. The world sees us through their eyes.
192 posted on 07/09/2002 9:32:02 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Aaron Brown was very unhappy when Lou Dobbs pointed out that most voters blame clinton, not Bush.

LOL .. did you hear Brown and how he ended his show

He thanked Lou Dobbs for the cold water

193 posted on 07/09/2002 9:33:21 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Good point. You are right about the campaign issue stuff. They've been groping for one for a very very long time. They'll probably go with it, but what is the Democrats' undoing is their pathological desire to have someone to hate.

It's amazing, there is a whole list of people who, if you just mention their names, send Democrats into a tizzy. It struck me again when Jesse Jackson mentioned John Ashcroft. Totally unnecessary, but he knew it would get the crowd excited (and bring in the $).

So, the Democrats will try to go after Bush on this and fail, whereas if they were to go after Republicans generally, they might have a modicum of success.

194 posted on 07/09/2002 9:33:28 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm not sure if it was so much to up the ante, as it was to try to make anything that Bush said look as though it was only done under pressure from the left. Obviously, Bush went much further than Daschle expected and took complete control of the initiative. It made Daschle look like the fumbling obstructionist that he is.
195 posted on 07/09/2002 9:33:32 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
No prob.

It is about as unchanged as it can get. As of 12:28 EDT:

DJIA 9276.42 +1.52
NASDAQ 1404.98 -0.63
^SPC 972.52 -4.46

196 posted on 07/09/2002 9:33:32 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Yes, a corporate fraud swat team under the DOJ has MUCH more potential for actual RESULTS than the "Investors Bill of Rights' proposed by Daschle 45 minutes before GW's speech. This 'bill of rights' rhetoric is getting VERY OLD!!!! Too bad lobbyist's compensation parachutes weren't addressed by GW also. Daschle would REALLY be sweating bullets about now. Global Crossing and Mrs. Daschle have much to answer to re: their actions.
197 posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:14 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
It gives the Demos an issue a way to attack Bush and the GOP.

How many more times can this man be wrong?

198 posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:21 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
greenfield going on and on about Bush's business ethics. Says this will now haunt him and will not end. So much for objectivity and fairness, right. Same old, same old.

This cracks me up. The press keeps saying that the Dems are not going to let this go. That they will harp on this until November. My question to the press is, "the Democrats want to harp on this until the election, why are you guys so willing to be their lap dogs and cover the harping, if not do the harping yourselves?" I know, it's a stupid question. Seems most of the press has decided to just forget about trying to look objective.

199 posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:24 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Bozo and I take offense at that.
200 posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:37 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481-496 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson