Posted on 07/08/2002 10:23:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA
The commentator on SanDiegoChannel, KGTV, said that he thought the Cherokee Young's mother and a dog had mated. This is being watched by possibly thousands or more on the internet.
FresnoDa made a parody. He didn't (I don't believe) say it was a fact. He and others were lampooning the CLINTON episodes.
The things that have been said about CLINTON would , if a lawyer were able to sue for them all , generate a KAZILLION DOLLAR lawsuit, huh?
So, while I understand your concern for Jim Robinson, Why did you just pick on FRESNODa? What about the million other things the rest of us have said? What about the things said about Clinton, or TWA800 and the people involved in it?
I know, where do you draw the line? Well, I think we do fairly well in letting someone know they are getting into the bad taste category.
Maybe some things have been close to that line, but again. Why pick on one person?
Did you see this ?
Spectators Lining Up For Seat At(Westerfield)Trial: July 8, 2002: Barb Easton Watch Continues Posted by FresnoDA to spectre On News/Activism Jul 8 6:16 PM #729 of 1,048 There's that LE and VD connection again...you're hot, Fres! Thanks...I am also in hot water...seems that truth_seeker is representing Denise Kemal...who is suing Free Republic and myself for slander..... Huh....I guess she takes offense to the alleged insinuation that she is a SLUTJACKAL I can't figure out why..... I am concerned however that the National Zoological Association has contacted me on behalf of JACKAL LOVERS, who are bringing suit against me and Free Republic for slandering Jackals by evoking Jackals as reference with regard to The Brend, The Den and The Barb..... Oh my, what to do, what to do..... FDA/lol/so http://www.freerepublic.com/fo cus/news/712577/posts?page=729 #729
Only one way to know for sure.
One of them has to have the guts to post the Private mail so we all KNOW.
Gentlemen, would you like to settle this the proper way?
Seriously, I think FresnoDa gets carried away sometimes.
I hate the snitty remarks.
If you go back and read the threads, you will see this. You will see I try to maintain the calm on these threads. You will see that I enjoy engaging in discussions with an opposing viewpoint. I appreciate those that have the other view.
What I don't appreciate is those that JUMP IN , and either PICK ON one person, or JUMP IN and start ranting at everyone that won't immediately believe them.
You have been on these threads enough to know what is going on.
There are certain posters on these threads that get 'catty' with each other. There are a couple that seem to enjoy picking on each other.
We all try to moderate this, so that these posters, who ACTUALLY DO CONTRIBUTE a lot of IMPORTANT INFORMATION, do not get kicked off.
Now, Truth_seeker and FresnoDA seem to have a dispute, and JimRob is being involved (I guess) again by one or both.
I want to settle this here. I have said this over and over. Take responsibility for your own actions. Don't ask others to do or be a certain way. SET THE EXAMPLE, then they will most likely follow.
I have asked them to settle this man to man, in front of us all, so we can see who is causing a problem, and settle it.
I want to get back to discussions of the DW case.
It isn't over and a little girl is dead, and a man's life is on the line for it.
If you really think, after all I the work I have done in thread after thread, that I am trying to agitate the situation, then I am failing.
If the bug expert testifies tomorrow, will that be the straw that broke the camel's (prosecutions) back?
To FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 13:12:09 sent
"I think you should contact your insurance agent. Notify him/her that you are posting a suggestion on the internet, that a person engages in bestiality.
Ask your agent, if your existing coverage would apply, in the event the individual were to sue you?
You might contact Jim Robinson, because you might be in the same lawsuit with him, over the issue."
From FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 13:47:33 replied
"Hi (truth_seeker)...which post are you referring to?"
To FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 15:03:26 sent
"I am referring specifically to your suggestion with Denise and bestiality.
Check with your insurance agent and your lawyer."
Perhaps my PRIVATE words could have been better selected. I do admit that they were strong, just as intended PRIVATELY.
Even if my word choice was imperfect, it was intended to be handled PRIVATELY. FresnoDA decided to make it public, obviously needing further attention derived from repeated PUBLIC ridicule of me.
I guess I should have known better than to think that FresnoDA had the good judgement, to resolve it PRIVATELY, as I set out to do.
Maybe the moderators want to expose FR to lawsuit defense EXPENSES, so that FresnoDA can have a playground. If that is the case, I will stand corrected.
Let the readers decide between the actual text above, and FresnoDA's use of same, regarding judgement, responsibility, accuracy, fair play, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.