Replies

One of two things. FresnoDa is exaggerating what Truth_seeker said to him in private mail, or, Truth_seeker is trying to antagonize FresnoDa, and did say those things in private mail.

Only one way to know for sure.

One of them has to have the guts to post the Private mail so we all KNOW.

Gentlemen, would you like to settle this the proper way?

This should set the record straight, for it is verbatim, cut & pasted from the private mail, which preceeded FresnoDA going public with his rendition.

To FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 13:12:09 sent

"I think you should contact your insurance agent. Notify him/her that you are posting a suggestion on the internet, that a person engages in bestiality.

Ask your agent, if your existing coverage would apply, in the event the individual were to sue you?

You might contact Jim Robinson, because you might be in the same lawsuit with him, over the issue."

From FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 13:47:33 replied

"Hi (truth_seeker)...which post are you referring to?"

To FresnoDA | 2002-07-08 15:03:26 sent

"I am referring specifically to your suggestion with Denise and bestiality.

Check with your insurance agent and your lawyer."

Perhaps my PRIVATE words could have been better selected. I do admit that they were strong, just as intended PRIVATELY.

Even if my word choice was imperfect, it was intended to be handled PRIVATELY. FresnoDA decided to make it public, obviously needing further attention derived from repeated PUBLIC ridicule of me.

I guess I should have known better than to think that FresnoDA had the good judgement, to resolve it PRIVATELY, as I set out to do.

Maybe the moderators want to expose FR to lawsuit defense EXPENSES, so that FresnoDA can have a playground. If that is the case, I will stand corrected.

Let the readers decide between the actual text above, and FresnoDA's use of same, regarding judgement, responsibility, accuracy, fair play, etc.