Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: BRENDA VAN DAM DANCED WITH WESTERFIELD: (Modern Day Westside Story?)7-9-02 Trial Watch
KFMB ^ | July 9, 2002 | KFMB

Posted on 07/08/2002 10:23:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,281-1,292 next last
To: Rheo
I can't believe courtTV actually showed the argument without cutting away.
What I got out of it - Denise gave an early statement - her first probably - on feb 2 at like 5pm - and she didn't mention anything odd ocurring at Dad's that night. On like Feb. 27 in an interview that did not have a report made of it till March 8 - she comes up with Westerfield being creepy. Did anyone else hear this between the lines?
261 posted on 07/09/2002 10:16:20 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
came out of sidebar and the witness was excused without testifying....heresay rule
262 posted on 07/09/2002 10:16:39 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Sing everyone...

Motor-Ho Ho Home.....
263 posted on 07/09/2002 10:17:07 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I guess it's marginally better than threatening lawsuits. Just marginally.
264 posted on 07/09/2002 10:18:08 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Thanks...the radio feed cut away....look for Denise to be coming back from Baltimore or wherever.
265 posted on 07/09/2002 10:18:21 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
The Motorhome song parody is awesome - I like that song anyway - you are too hilarious.
266 posted on 07/09/2002 10:19:39 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; All
Which juror sent a note to the judge yesterday asking when would the jurors get to question the witnesses?
267 posted on 07/09/2002 10:19:56 AM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Karson
NO WAY!!!!!! LOL
268 posted on 07/09/2002 10:20:52 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Yep! Judge Mudd had to explain that jurors doesn't question witnesses. Makes you wonder about the jury ....
269 posted on 07/09/2002 10:22:24 AM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Karson
You gotta be kidding. Did that really happen?
270 posted on 07/09/2002 10:22:44 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Hadn't heard that....did the Judge mention when they would be taking call in questions?? :-)
271 posted on 07/09/2002 10:22:52 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl; Rheo
I am just getting caught up, but a statement by a party is not hearsay. Likewise, a prior statement by a witness is not hearsay. So, the prosecution can introduce prior statements from DW. If a witness testifies to what they said, the defense can call a witness to refute that testimony.
272 posted on 07/09/2002 10:24:18 AM PDT by GoldenBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Did you salute before entering this thread? I've been called sour, humorless and at one time hostile. Are these personal attacks? Guess not.
273 posted on 07/09/2002 10:24:29 AM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Did you read Helen's comments yesterday about her experience as as juror? I was really really hoping that this jury was a balanced and in control. What'd they do, pass out the jury calls to local bars or what..fellow peers ya know.
274 posted on 07/09/2002 10:24:34 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: mommya; Jaded; FresnoDA
Yes, it's awesome--but I wonder if we don't need one to the tune of "Magic Bus?" Goes alone with Stealth Ninja Dave and the ruby slippers.

275 posted on 07/09/2002 10:24:39 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Here's another song...Let's everybody follow the bouncing ball...Here we goooo.

They're coming to take you away, ho ho
They're coming to take you away, ha ha
Away, ho ho...away ha ha...
They're coming to take (fill in the blanks) away!

sw

276 posted on 07/09/2002 10:25:19 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Yep! Judge Mudd had to explain that jurors doesn't question witnesses. Makes you wonder about the jury ....

In just a few states, the jury can submit questions to the judge to ask witnesses. I think it is a good idea.

277 posted on 07/09/2002 10:25:42 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: GoldenBear
Why are they arguing over hearsay again then?
278 posted on 07/09/2002 10:26:13 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
"did the Judge mention when they would be taking call in questions??" :-)


HAHAHAHAHAHA! That's a good one!!
279 posted on 07/09/2002 10:26:31 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Really???? Not in missouri and I think Kansas too.
280 posted on 07/09/2002 10:26:47 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,281-1,292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson