BREAKING: BRENDA VAN DAM DANCED WITH WESTERFIELD: (Modern Day Westside Story?)7-9-02 Trial Watch

To: the Deejay; UCANSEE2

"If memory serves me correctly, she was telling one of the other patrons at Dad's that she HAD BEEN to one."

That's what I recall too.

Me too.

1,261 posted on 07/09/2002 9:22:46 PM PDT by theirjustdue

To: BunnySlippers

Brenda & Barbara seem to be the agressors, not Damon. Poor man is probably having a hard time holding his own in this crowd.

1,262 posted on 07/09/2002 9:23:31 PM PDT by John Jamieson

To: theirjustdue

It's good to see you back. I always look forward to your posts.

1,263 posted on 07/09/2002 9:25:09 PM PDT by Karson

Thanks so much, Karson.

Good to see you are still here, as well.

1,264 posted on 07/09/2002 9:29:26 PM PDT by theirjustdue

To: Valpal1; John Jamieson

******BTW, right now he is charged under state law, a misdemeanor. He can be tried again under Federal law for felony posession.

http://www.missingkids.com/html/ncmec_default_ec_chldporn_laws.html

In 1977 the Sexual Exploitation of Children Act (18 U.S.C. 2251-2253) was enacted. The law prohibits the use of a minor in the making of pornography, the transport of a child across state lines, the taking of a pornographic picture of a minor, and the production and circulation of materials advertising child pornography. It also prohibits the transfer, sale, purchase, and receipt of minors when the purpose of such transfer, sale, purchase, or receipt is to use the child or youth in the production of child pornography. The transportation, importation, shipment, and receipt of child pornography by any interstate means, including by mail or computer, is also prohibited.

The Child Protection Act of 1984 (18 U.S.C. 2251-2255) defines anyone younger than the age of 18 as a child. Therefore, a sexually explicit photograph of anyone 17 years of age or younger is child pornography.

On November 7, 1986, the U.S. Congress enacted the Child Sexual Abuse and Pornography Act (18 U.S.C. 2251-2256), that banned the production and use of advertisements for child pornography and included a provision for civil remedies of personal injuries suffered by a minor who is a victim. It also raised the minimum sentences for repeat offenders from imprisonment of not less than two years to imprisonment of not less than five years.

On November 18, 1988, the U.S. Congress enacted the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act (18 U.S.C. 2251-2256) that made it unlawful to use a computer to transmit advertisements for or visual depictions of child pornography and it prohibited the buying, selling, or otherwise obtaining temporary custody or control of children for the purpose of producing child pornography.

On November 29, 1990, the U.S. Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. 2252 making it a federal crime to possess three or more depictions of child pornography that were mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce or that were produced using materials that were mailed or shipped by any means, including by computer.

With the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, (18 U.S.C. 2422) it is a federal crime for anyone using the mail, interstate or foreign commerce, to persuade, induce, or entice any individual younger than the age of 18 to engage in any sexual act for which the person may be criminally prosecuted.

The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 amends the definition of child pornography to include that which actually depicts the sexual conduct of real minor children and that which appears to be a depiction of a minor engaging in sexual conduct. Computer, photographic, and photocopy technology is amazingly competent at creating and altering images that have been “morphed” to look like children even though those photographed may have actually been adults. People who alter pornographic images to look like children can now be prosecuted under the law.

1,265 posted on 07/09/2002 9:30:36 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

To: the Deejay; Amore

THANK YOU for inviting AMORE!! I am greatly appreciative of making a new freeper friend. She's very nice, smart and contributes greatly to free republic. I want her to come back!!

1,266 posted on 07/09/2002 9:32:20 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

To: John Jamieson

Poor man? EW, he is creepy. And I am NOT kidding. : )

He gives me that same crawly feeling I always got when I was forced to look at Clinton.

1,267 posted on 07/09/2002 9:34:23 PM PDT by Politicalmom

We need a QUOTE from brenda. I thought she said no, she doesn't Remember dancing with DW. That's different that denying it 100%. I'll try to find it..

1,268 posted on 07/09/2002 9:35:50 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

To: theirjustdue

I've missed your contributions..

1,269 posted on 07/09/2002 9:36:30 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

To: theirjustdue

Karson is not the only one who is glad to see you back and say you were missed....she's just quicker and more considerate!

Glad to hear you'll be able to join us more.

1,270 posted on 07/09/2002 9:38:02 PM PDT by Rheo

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

SCOTUS 2002 ammedment = never mind.

1,271 posted on 07/09/2002 9:41:58 PM PDT by John Jamieson

Paging FrEEEESNO!!

Kim wants a BRENDA QUOTE!!!!

Paging the quotemaster!! : )

1,272 posted on 07/09/2002 9:46:11 PM PDT by Politicalmom

To: John Jamieson

It is currently being fixed in the house..and senate. Not to worry...and they NEED to make the fix retroactive too. :)

1,273 posted on 07/09/2002 9:53:09 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

To: Politicalmom

not the html scream meister..please no!! :)

1,274 posted on 07/09/2002 9:53:54 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8

Posted by the Deejay to cyncooper On News/Activism Jul 8 7:49 PM #950 of 1,052

If I'm not mistaken, I do think Danielle L. &/or Jennifer L. are going to testify that Danielle vDam was in the RV with them a time or two. This is the rumor or fact that I've been hearing for several months, since the prelim. And that's when Danielle vDams carpet fibers, blood & hair got in the RV.

Both girls testified today but not as you anticipated.

1,275 posted on 07/09/2002 9:54:12 PM PDT by cyncooper

To: Politicalmom

We have all jumped (like fleas) onto a new dog, (I mean thread). Please join us.

I pinged everyone. If you didn' t get pinged, let me know.

1,276 posted on 07/09/2002 9:55:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2

Both girls testified today but not as you anticipated.

YEP. Internet RUMOR mill was WRONG on this one.

And I was so looking forward to it, since it would take the steam out of Dusek, and maybe short cut the trial, and maybe give me my life back.

We would have had a high probability that DW was not guilty (Still not absolute proof, mind you).

1,277 posted on 07/09/2002 9:59:08 PM PDT by UCANSEE2

1,278 posted on 07/09/2002 9:59:50 PM PDT by UCANSEE2

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Thanks Kim.

After all these VD threads, I suspect there's no way either of us could ever just walk away from them.

The way it looks right now, I'm guessing mistrial, but there's much yet to be answered in these closing days of testimony.

If this does turn out to be a mistrial, these could turn out to set a new FR record as never ending threads.

1,279 posted on 07/09/2002 10:09:05 PM PDT by theirjustdue

Did your mouse pointer freeze on Post

My reply to others who gave me a hard time was: Hahahahahahahahaha! My finger just kept bobbing up and down uncontrolably.

I put my foot in my mouth with that reply as UCANSEE2 then had this reply: Now I know how you got your screen name. (eeeewwww)

I need to be careful with what I say. ;-)

1,280 posted on 07/09/2002 10:11:57 PM PDT by Spunky

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794