[Black Agnes]

Ping for interesting read. Cacique, are they all this bad at univ now? What a shame.

[Cacique]

In response to your question. This professor seems to be relatively mild. What we used to call in my former Stalinist circles as a useful fool. There are others who are much more radical and unpretentious about things like the necessary mass murder that will have to take place once the socialist takeover takes place. Dana would find himself among the first to be shot (provided a more efficient method of extermination is not found). What Stalinists cannot stand besides Troskyist revisionists is mushy left wing liberals who harp about compassion. As Lenin aptly stated you can't make omelettes without breaking eggs. Or as Stalin so aptly noted "one death is a tragedy, 50,000 is a statistic".

Pure socialists are not interested in the individual but in reaching the ideal, even if this means the eventual liquidation of upwards of 90% of the population to remove them from the gene pool. After all, that is what being a member of the elite revolutionary vanguard means. Dana is obviously conversant in cliches and slogans. In the end they are good for propaganda for the masses. Unfortunately Dana actually believes his line of BS. I assume he has never met commited Stalinist leftists more conversant in the theoretical aspects of the class struggle and how to go about achieviong absolute power.

We can all take comfort in the knowledge that when my former Stalinist colleagues take over, it will be people like Dana who will be shot first. The Mensheviks have obviously never learned anything from history. All they do is pave the way and like all good cannon fodder lose out in the end.