Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup Stunner: Americans Blame Clinton for Business Scandals
NewsMax.com ^ | 7/08/02 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 07/08/2002 6:56:20 AM PDT by kattracks

Despite a coordinated Democratic Party-media push to pin blame for the recent wave of corporate scandals on President Bush, a majority of Americans currently blame ex-President Bill Clinton for the business corruption that has sent the stock market reeling and caused a crisis in confidence in corporate America, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Monday.

51 percent of Americans surveyed agreed that President Clinton's "moral failings in office" contributed to the permissive climate that encouraged corporate leaders to behave unethically.

Of that number, more than half, 26 percent "strongly agreed" that Clinton was partially responsible for the business scandals. The rest, 25 percent, "moderately agreed" the ex-president deserved blame.

When asked the same question about President Bush, only 15 percent "strongly agreed" that he set a climate that encouraged corporate corruption. 31 percent "moderately agreed" with the same proposition, for a cumulative total of 46 percent - five percent less than those who blame Clinton.

Another stunning development: President Bush's approval ratings have actually improved in the weeks since the Democrat-media complex began shifting blame to Bush.

The CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll put Bush's overall job approval at 76 percent - up six points since early June.

"This result alone suggests that the president has been untouched by these scandals," Gallup said.

Gallup surveyed 1,019 adults over the age of 18 on June 28-30. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals
Sen. Hillary Clinton



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-217 next last
To: concerned about politics
CONT'D...Like a dog, every politician has to have at least one kid, too.

Clinton would not release his medical records, either. He refused. I don't know of any other president that had anything to hide.

121 posted on 07/08/2002 8:19:56 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
tom, al and bill, stick this in your pipe and smoke it! BUMP!

Inhale, maybe it will help your thought processes since "not inhaling" hasn't worked.

122 posted on 07/08/2002 8:20:11 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steve50
And who is in jail and what percentage of the gains from cooking the books has been taken away from those who profitted? Nobody and none

The firm is destroyed but before hand would have been worth 1.5 times revenues.

123 posted on 07/08/2002 8:21:18 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Sister Rose
Could they put the Clintons and algore in Gitmo?
124 posted on 07/08/2002 8:21:28 AM PDT by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Yer the best, A-G!!

"Dennis Gingold, a lawyer for the Indians, reacted angrily: "I think Mr. Rubin should go to jail for this. This is criminal contempt."...."

""....The forced resignation today of disgraced Clinton Treasury secretary Robert Rubin may have been a result of imminent further exposure of a vast array of corrupt activities, from Treasury's attempted coercion of United States Secret Service agents to lie during their Filegate testimony in 1996 and the agents' criminal prosecution as a result of that testimony, to today's New York Times story "CHINA SENT CASH TO U.S. BANK, WITH SUSPICIONS SLOW TO RISE" ....However, the final straw that broke Rubin's back could well have been a brilliant investigative journalism article by the USA TODAY's Tom Lowry on May 3, 1999, "TRUST SCANDAL HAUNTS GOLDMAN/SULLIED BISHOP ESTATE OWNS 10% OF BANK/HIGHLY PAID TRUSTEES FACING ACCUSATIONS, CHARGES", which was excerpted in a May 5, 1999 FreeRepublic article .... Mr. Lowry exhaustively details the utterly corrupt activities of Hawaii's giant Bishop Estate in general, and a highly suspect transaction between the Bishop Estate and the personal financial account of Robert Rubin in particular. Rubin is also a former chairman of Goldman Sachs and whose Treasury department regulates both the Bishop Estate and Goldman Sachs. Rubin apparently operated at Treasury, regulating both the Bishop Estate and Goldman Sachs, will full awareness of his massive conflicts of interest involving his personal investments, the Treasury department, the Internal Revenue Service, Goldman Sachs, and the Bishop Estate..... "...I am a professional stock market investor myself. ...... For those of you with the Black Scholes model, just set the price of Goldman Sachs at 100, set the expiration date at a year from now of a put option with a strike price of 100, and tell me what you get. I bet that put is worth at least 20, or twenty percent of the value of the underlying stock position. In the case of Rubin's Goldman stock holdings in 1993, the at the money, one year put warrant would be worth at least $20 million annually, not $100,000...... THIS WOULD SUGGEST AN "AT THE MONEY ONE YEAR PUT OPTION" ON RUBIN'S 1993 GOLDMAN SACHS HOLDINGS WAS WORTH WELL OVER $20 MILLION!!! With the value of Rubin's Goldman Sachs holdings appreciating in recent years, the value of the Bishop Estate put on $100 million of underlying Goldman value sold to Rubin would decline, but I think it is fair to say that Rubin, via this put maneuver with the Bishop Estate, a charity, may have received illegal gratuities, in 1993 alone, if he paid only approximately $100,000 for his one year, at the money Goldman put warrant which was in fact worth well over $20 million...."

WOW!!! This dude's just danglin' out there waiting to get picked off by a criminal investigator with some cajones!!

FReegards...MUD

125 posted on 07/08/2002 8:26:55 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Management has already cashed out with hundreds of millions, why should they care that stockholders valuation has dropped. They're already planning the next raid.
126 posted on 07/08/2002 8:28:21 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"...if [Slick Willie]'s been sterile since his boyhood, where did Chelsea come from?"

Webb Hubbell is generally understood to be Chelsea's sperm donor...MUD

127 posted on 07/08/2002 8:29:54 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So, guess when this gem will appear on:

CNNABCNBCCNN?

How about never, is never good for you?

128 posted on 07/08/2002 8:30:32 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I wish that were true. But then how do you explain eight years of Clinton, and a decidedly pro-Clinton public opinion during the whole impeachment thing?

I don't think people were so much "Pro-Clinton" as they were more for the preservation of the office, and against the transfer of title to Al Gore. Besides, the media was absolutely against the conservative view, and did a lot to brainwash the masses.

It took the sleaziness of the Clintons as they left office to wake Americans up to the fact that Clinton & Co. were really as bad as they had been denying for all those years. Even the media were aghast at the pardons Clinton enacted.

129 posted on 07/08/2002 8:31:02 AM PDT by FLCowboy,
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; backhoe
I received that email about a week ago.
130 posted on 07/08/2002 8:31:36 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Webb Hubbell is generally understood to be Chelsea's sperm donor...MUD

She does look like him, doesn't she?
They could have picked someone a little better looking, but I guess just having the kid was politically correct enough. Now Chelsea has to live with that face.

131 posted on 07/08/2002 8:33:07 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
. Normally they would design the question so there was no way people could identify Klintoon as the culprit.

I would like to see the actual survey question. It could have been designed improperly but President Bush still came out ahead in spite of the wording.

Just a thought.

132 posted on 07/08/2002 8:37:39 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Good to see you still there - Alamo-Girl. Hope you are doing well. Thanks for the info. May need much more given the coming propaganda smear attacks for Nov 2002.
133 posted on 07/08/2002 8:40:42 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"They could have picked someone a little better looking..."

Allegely, Ol' Hubb was a football player and somewhat of a ladies' man back then, and the jowels came later. Unfortunately, Chelsea appears to picked up the JowelsGene from the git-go.

FReegards...MUD

134 posted on 07/08/2002 8:42:47 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Mornin' Quilla, You're probably right. Still it would be fun just watching her have a breakdown on live TV. FOFLOL.
135 posted on 07/08/2002 8:43:57 AM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Ah yes, another part of Bubba's legacy!

I think we can conclude that all these years he's been in search of his leg-assy.

136 posted on 07/08/2002 8:44:24 AM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower
tom, al and bill, stick this in your pipe and smoke it! BUMP! Inhale, maybe it will help your thought processes since "not inhaling" hasn't worked.

Wow. 100 foot flames. This comment was directed at tom, al and bill not you. A friend saw my post and burned me royally. Sorry

137 posted on 07/08/2002 8:47:47 AM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll put Bush's overall job approval at 76 percent - up six points since early June.

I just love it. All the Democreeps drooling over the corporate scandals and trying to put the blame on Bush is backfiring. His approval rating keeps going up. BUSH/CHENEY 2004!!!

138 posted on 07/08/2002 8:52:04 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Classic Mud! 8-)
139 posted on 07/08/2002 8:53:08 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I haven't heard dems talk about forcing old people to eat dogfood in a while

NAHHH! They are going to talk about old people being forced to eat each other because of the economy and because senior citizens cannot afford prescription drugs to combat cannibalism. ;-)

140 posted on 07/08/2002 8:56:32 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson