To: dcwusmc
For me, I can see the usefulness of such research, but I cannot condone killing the pre-born to conduct it! I have heard that there are adult stem-cells that could work even better.... why is it that we must have fetal cells, then? Maybe it IS part of the pubbiecrat agenda so that they can keep abortion as a FedGov issue instead of putting it back to the States, where it would be feasible to get it outlawed on a state by state basis. Enjoy your BBQ. I am going to Marine World with the wife when she gets off work at 1800 local time
Huh, no mention of the 1993 demo passed law.
How convienent.
Oh well go ahead, live in your revisionist world. It suits you well.
31 posted on
07/07/2002 1:12:40 PM PDT by
Dane
To: Dane
Well, well... Old Dane with his non-sequiters and lackafacts is back today. I have really not missed you a bit!
Dane, if this "law," passed by a Dem congress during Mr Bill's admin, means anything why'd Dubya make that speech last year? It was a MAJOR stand he took, or so I thought. If his hands were so tied, why'd he even bother?
As to your convenience, I could care less. Nor have I "revised" one damned thing. I am asking questions and you can't be bothered to find an answer so you spew your barbra streisand all over FR, yet again.
42 posted on
07/07/2002 1:27:52 PM PDT by
dcwusmc
To: Dane
If said Demo law exists, it could be overturned by dinnertime. The Constitution gives the President veto power; the congress can't prevent that. So, either the law does not exist, or the administration does not want to overturn it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson