Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Keyes For President; Askel5
READ MY LIPS

Think Again, Mr. President - Bush Must Reconsider Stem Cell Decision
Let’s start where the President started: in his campaign declarations.

On Nov. 21, 1999, on NBC’s "Meet the Press," then-candidate Bush affirmed the basic fact from which any discussion of this research must begin.

Tim Russert asked, "Do you believe life begins at conception?"

"I do," said Bush.

...Clinton’s proposed rules, the Washington Post reported, "forbid the use of federal funds to destroy embryos directly, but they permit federal research on stem cells taken from embryos by privately financed researchers."

The response from candidate Bush was emphatic. "The governor opposes federal funding for stem cell research that involves destroying a living human embryo," said campaign spokesman Ray Sullivan. But what of Clinton’s effort to finesse the issue by funding research only after the killing was done by private money? Reported the Post: "In Bush’s view, Sullivan said, that still amounts to federal support of embryo destruction."

In October, Bush reiterated this position in a written statement to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. "Taxpayer funds," said Bush, "should not underwrite research that involves the destruction of live human embryos."

As late as May 18, Bush stood firmly by this position. "I oppose federal funding for stem cell research that involves destroying living human embryos," the President wrote in a letter to the Culture of Life Foundation.

Although Bush never published a succinct syllogism summarizing his argument, it is easy to infer what it was:

1) Human life begins at conception.

2) It is wrong to deliberately take an innocent human life.

3) Taxpayers, therefore, should not be forced by government to subsidize scientists who do research that begins with the deliberate destruction of innocent lives.
[End of Partial Transcript]


Bush Would End Stem Cell Research Involving Human Embryos

UPI
Staff
September 22, 2000

If elected president, pro-life Texas Gov. George W. Bush would end stem cell research involving human embryos, an aide to the Republican presidential nominee said Friday.

The controversial practice was cleared last month for taxpayer funding by the National Institutes of Health.

"It's something we would take steps to remedy," a Bush campaign health policy adviser said, on condition of anonymity, as the candidate suggested an increase in NIH funding by $67 billion over 10 years.

The adviser said Bush's public stance against medical studies using tissue from unborn children would lead a Bush administration to cut off taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research, which the NIH approved in August by lifting a yearlong moratorium.

Stem cells, formed in humans and animals at the beginning of life, have the ability to produce a variety of specialized cells in the body, such as muscle cells or nerve cells. Scientists believe they can cultivate stem cells to produce healthy tissues to augment or replace ailing organs.

Pro-life organziations oppose stem cell research and have been promoting life-affirming alternatives that would advance scientific research but not at the expense of killing unborn children.

"Gov. Bush as a pro-life candidate does not support things that would be the potential taking of a life, so that's why embryonic (research) is problematic for us," the adviser said.
[End of Transcript]

"If elected president, pro-life Texas Gov. George W. Bush would end stem cell research involving human embryos,"

"It's something we would take steps to remedy,"

"Bush's public stance against medical studies using tissue from unborn children would lead a Bush administration to cut off taxpayer funding for embryonic stem cell research,"

Thanks for the vote suckers


Bush: No Federal Money For Research On Fetal Tissue From Abortions

Associated Press
Staff
January 26, 2001
AP-CS-1630EST

WASHINGTON (AP) President Bush said Friday that federal money should not pay for research on fetal tissue or so-called stem cells derived from abortions.

"I do not support research from aborted fetuses," he said.

He did not say whether he would move to block federal research funding an act that many scientists say could stop promising research into therapies for numerous diseases. Aides said afterward he was signaling his intent to do so.

Bush had indicated his opposition to such research during the presidential campaign, but the remarks Friday were his first on the topic since taking over the White House a week ago.

"I will let you know when I decide all policy decisions, but the answer to your question is no," Bush said when asked whether he believes federal money should be spent on fetal-tissue and stem-cell research from abortions.

On Monday, two days into his presidency, Bush had moved to restore restrictions on U.S. foreign aid to family-planning organizations involved in abortion. Anti-abortion conservatives were a cornerstone of his political campaign.

Scientists say research with stem cells, master cells that are the building blocks for all other tissue in the body, could lead to revolutionary treatments for problems from Alzheimer's to paralyzing spinal cord injuries.

Stem cells can come from aborted fetuses or from embryos left over from fertility clinics. A few also can be found from adult tissues, but scientists say fetal and embryonic stem cells are the most flexible and thus most usable.

Bush did not specifically address embryonic stem cells.

Some conservative groups oppose using embryonic stem cells for research because culling them kills the embryos. Scientists now know how to multiply embryonic stem cells in laboratories without killing additional embryos. Unless Bush intervenes, the National Institutes of Health plans to begin funding research with just those lab-grown embryonic stem cells as early as this spring.

Some researchers are concerned that Bush might cut off existing funding for a larger type of research related to tissues from induced abortions. Some Parkinson's disease patients, for instance, improved after receiving fetal tissue transplants in their brains.

Bush has said in the past he supports an alternative method using fetal tissues retrieved from miscarriages. But scientists say such tissue is seldom usable because of genetic abnormalities in the fetus that caused the miscarriage.

"I believe there's some wonderful opportunities for adult stem-cell research," Bush said. "I believe we can find stem cells from fetuses that died a natural death, but I do not support research from aborted fetuses."

He commented in a question-and-answer session during a meeting with Democratic and Republican governors.

Shortly before Bush took office, his spokesman refused to address whether the new Republican administration would shut down government research on the stem cells of discarded human embryos.

Press secretary Ari Fleischer, quoting his boss' statements during the campaign, said Friday that Bush "would oppose federally funded research for experimentation on embryonic stem cells that require live human embryos to be discarded or destroyed."

But Fleischer, questioned by reporters, would not say whether Bush intends to block the NIH, which is now accepting grant applications for research on lab-grown embryonic stem cells initially harvested by private researchers.

Bush stopped short Friday of saying whether or how he might block the NIH funding.

Incoming Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson has likewise sidestepped the issue. But as an anti-abortion governor of Wisconsin, Thompson praised as medical pioneers the University of Wisconsin scientists who first grew embryonic stem cells in their laboratory.

The White House is reviewing all rules and executive orders implemented by the Clinton administration, including those on abortion-related research.
[End of Transcript]

78 Lives, er, Lines and Counting

A Bitter Conclusion Over Stem Cells

Bush OKs Stem Cell Research

The Politics of Stem Cells

Hesitant Bush really lost now (Embryonic Stem Cell Research)


Thank you sooooooooo much for your vote, hahahahaha

246 posted on 07/07/2002 6:07:26 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Bill
I'd missed his stating that life begins at conception.

Bet he got a "briefing" or two after that one.

249 posted on 07/07/2002 6:11:30 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill
Bush stopped short Friday of saying whether or how he might block the NIH funding.

Dang Uncle Bill, I tried so hard to pick out just one thing in your post.

So I finally picked that one.

So little time.

Heck, I remember when GW wasn't running, but the GOP was running him anyway.

He said he didn't want to be President and his wife and the girls didn't want him to be.

Oh well. We got him.

If you don't vote for him, we will have President Gore.

I don't notice a difference.

Other than we would all be raising heck. If Gore was doing and not doing this stuff.

273 posted on 07/07/2002 7:11:03 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill
Re: #246---ouch.
274 posted on 07/07/2002 7:12:56 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill
Excellent post Unc. Thanks for putting it all together.
298 posted on 07/07/2002 7:49:52 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill
If elected president, pro-life Texas Gov. George W. Bush would end stem cell research involving human embryos, an aide to the Republican presidential nominee said Friday.

Well, yeah.

Read my lips.

318 posted on 07/07/2002 8:17:18 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill
"He did not say whether he would move to block federal research funding an act that many scientists say could stop promising research into therapies for numerous diseases. Aides said afterward he was signaling his intent to do so."

Don't you just hate whe a Driver, or even President for that matter, signals a Right Turn, but then turns Left? ;-)

356 posted on 07/08/2002 3:09:17 AM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Bill

bump


451 posted on 05/22/2004 12:19:13 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson