I was going to respond to his post and ask him to take it a notch higher--beyond the rhetoric--and give us a respectable critique. This is where the piece itself by Dawkins is not helpful. Anything, I repeat, anything can be slammed. It is an art to analyze and understand.
A "respectable critique" would be wasted on most of the pro-Dawkins groupies here. Why take the trouble of crafting a detailed, careful analysis and posting it only to have them unzip and urinate on it?
Smash-mouth graffiti--not detailed, fine art--is generally all that these zealots deserve.
There is a time and place for everything. This is neither the time nor place.