Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to Vaccinate 500,000 Workers Against Smallpox
New York Times ^ | 7/06/02 | WILLIAM J. BROAD

Posted on 07/06/2002 6:29:42 PM PDT by kattracks


The federal government will soon vaccinate roughly a half-million health care and emergency workers against smallpox as a precaution against a bioterrorist attack, federal officials said. The government is also laying the groundwork to carry out mass vaccinations of the public — a policy abandoned 30 years ago — if there is a large outbreak.

Until last month, officials had said they would soon vaccinate a few thousand health workers and would respond to any smallpox attack with limited vaccinations of the public. Since 1983, only 11,000 Americans who work with the virus and its related diseases have received a vaccination, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The plan to increase the number of "first responders" who receive the vaccination to roughly 500,000 from 15,000 and to prepare for a mass undertaking of vaccinations in effect acknowledges that the government's existing program is insufficient to fight a large outbreak.

The government's new vaccination safeguards come amid continued talk in Washington of war against Iraq, which terrorism experts suspect of maintaining clandestine stocks of the virus, as well as growing criticism of the government's limited plan. Only Russia and the United States have declared stocks of the virus.

A highly contagious disease, smallpox was declared eradicated globally in 1980, eight years after the United States stopped routine vaccinations.

Until its eradication, smallpox killed roughly one in three people who were infected but not vaccinated. Because immunity is believed to diminish with time, most people alive today are considered vulnerable to smallpox. But federal officials have long resisted the resumption of mass smallpox vaccinations, citing the probable risk of serious side effects, even death.

Last month, a federal advisory panel backed a plan for "ring vaccinations," in which health workers would isolate infected patients and vaccinate people in close contact with them, forming a ring of immunization around an outbreak and a barrier to its spread. In theory, such a strategy can work because the vaccine, if given within four days of exposure to the virus, protects people from the disease.

Some experts on infectious disease said the plan's main virtue was that it required little smallpox vaccine.

The government's more aggressive plans are possible because vaccine supplies are rapidly increasing as a result of crash manufacturing and stockpiling efforts begun soon after last fall's terrorist strikes, officials said. Also, studies have found that existing vaccine doses can be diluted without loss of effectiveness.

"Now we can act differently because we have more vaccine," Dr. Donald A. Henderson, senior science adviser to Tommy G. Thompson, the secretary of health and human services, said in an interview. Dr. Henderson, who led the global smallpox eradication effort, added that in a crisis "we can make vaccine available on request throughout the community."

Officials said that about 100 million doses of the smallpox vaccine (160 million if diluted) are in hand and that by late this year or soon thereafter enough will be available for every American, more than 280 million people.

Health and military experts, citing new models of how the contagion can spread and new disclosures about how the weaponized virus can sail on the wind, have recently argued that limited, local vaccinations could produce thousands if not millions of needless infections and deaths. Most critics of the ring vaccination plan advocate mass vaccinations of the United States population — but often before a smallpox attack, not after, as the government is now planning.

In addition to vaccinating more "first responders," the government plans to develop ways to speed vaccine deliveries around the country and help states plan how to carry out mass vaccinations after an attack.

Officials said the vaccinations of hospital workers and smallpox response teams, to begin fairly soon, would help train health professionals in smallpox vaccination and educate the public to the attendant risks.

The White House, Defense Department and other federal agencies are involved in the vaccination planning. "Everyone is aware," an administration official said.

Jerome M. Hauer, acting assistant secretary for emergency preparedness at the Department of Health and Human Services, said the agency hoped to send planning documents on how to best conduct mass vaccinations to cities and states in the next week or two. Mr. Hauer added that logistics changes to that end were under way at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, which oversees the production, safekeeping and distribution of the nation's stockpile of smallpox vaccine.

Other details of the plans, such as who would receive peacetime vaccinations, have yet to be approved by Mr. Thompson, officials said.

In interviews last week, health officials said the government had not abandoned its longstanding plan for ring vaccinations of people near a smallpox outbreak, the approach health workers used decades ago to eradicate the highly contagious disease from human populations. But the added steps, officials said, will make it possible to move far more aggressively if a terrorist attack ends up infecting more than 100 people or so.

Critics had said the ring approach, while useful in battling natural outbreaks, would do little or nothing against a moderately skilled enemy intent on mayhem.

"Unless the initial attack is very small and the infectiousness of the agent is quite mild, ring vaccination is not going to do much good," said Edward H. Kaplan, a Yale public health specialist who questioned the method's value at a federal meeting in Washington three weeks ago.

In a report, the Cato Institute, a policy group in Washington, called ring vaccination "woefully inadequate for countering a direct attack."

Critics argued that a number of factors had diminished the method's effectiveness since the disease was eradicated in 1980: populations are now increasingly mobile, levels of immunity are very low and advanced technologies have become commonplace, raising the odds that a smallpox attacker would be at least moderately skilled.

"Today it's a totally different scenario," said William J. Bicknell, an international health expert at Boston University who recently faulted federal smallpox policy at a Cato meeting. The ring plan, he declared flatly in an interview, "will not work."

Federal officials said the rising criticism played no direct role in shaping preparations for mass vaccinations.

"The key to responding to any public health emergency is flexibility," Mr. Hauer said. "You listen to critics, but you can't let that drive policy. You have to do what's best for public health and national security."

Ring vaccination, he added, was envisioned as simply a first line of defense that could quickly expand to much wider immunizations if necessary.

Mr. Hauer added that the ring strategy was inherently small-scale because it required health professionals to carefully trace the whereabouts and contacts of infected people. Such work is so hard and time consuming, he noted, that ring vaccination is unsuitable as the only means of fighting a wide epidemic.

He said another complication could arise if the disease broke out simultaneously in multiple cities, suggesting a strike of unknown size and danger. In that case, he said, "the forces pressing you to mass vaccinate become greater."

Dr. Henderson, the chairman of the Secretary's Council on Public Health Preparedness at the Department of Health and Human Services, said critics have falsely portrayed the government as relying exclusively on ring vaccination.

"Let me be clear," he said. "If there is an emergency, and if we have to vaccinate widely, we need to be ready for it. That's what we're doing."

Mass vaccinations are not without risk because the smallpox vaccine uses a live virus, vaccinia, a cousin of smallpox, that on occasion can cause brain damage or even kill. In the days of wide vaccination, roughly one person in a million died.

The risk may be greater for people with weakened immune systems, like AIDS patients or people undergoing chemotherapy.

The government is seeking more supplies of vaccinia immune globulin, a substance now in short supply that can prevent severe reactions in people with immune problems as well as the healthy. Officials said 700 doses are in hand and 3,000 will be available by the year's end.

Despite the vaccine's well-known dangers, federal critics have increasingly called for various styles of mass vaccination — including doing it on a voluntary or mandatory basis, before or after a smallpox attack.

At a June 15 public forum in Washington on federal smallpox vaccination policy, Dr. Kaplan, of Yale, presented a study done with colleagues from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that described how a smallpox attack could affect a crowded metropolitan region like New York City. What began as 1,000 infections at a train station or airport, he said, would spiral over weeks and months into 97,000 deaths if fought with ring vaccination alone.

"By contrast," he said, "post-attack mass vaccination would result in only 525 deaths" from the smallpox virus, which takes about two weeks to develop in the body before symptoms become obvious.

Some federal officials call this study unrealistic. But at the meeting, such ideas gained force as new evidence came to light on how powdered smallpox can be used as a biological weapon.

Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff, a smallpox expert at the Sandia National Laboratories, reported that he and experts from the Monterey Institute of International Studies had linked a 1971 outbreak in the Kazakh Republic to a Soviet field test of weaponized smallpox.

Dr. Zelicoff, a physician, quoted a former Soviet official as saying the accident occurred when a plume of smallpox germs sailed about nine miles on the wind.

By the meeting's end, medical experts were questioning not only the ring plan but also federal assertions that the smallpox threat is low.

Dr. Kenneth I. Berns, president of the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City, said he judged the probability that Iraq possessed weaponized smallpox as "reasonably high" and that Saddam Hussein would use such germs in a war against the United States as "quite high."

"That's the confounding issue that we all face," Dr. Berns told the forum, according to a transcript.

Frank public discussion of the Iraqi threat, he added, "is absolutely essential."

In interviews, officials of the Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment on federal threat assessments but detailed wide contingency planning for mass smallpox vaccinations.

On June 20, a federal panel known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices backed the idea of immunizing some emergency workers before any attack. Experts estimated that the immunizations would go to some 15,000 health care and law enforcement workers who would be most likely to respond to a biological attack and come in contact with victims.

But Dr. Henderson, the health department's senior adviser on bioterrorism, said the tentative new plan was for many more to be vaccinated. "We could easily be at a half-million without too much difficulty," he said.

Wide peacetime vaccinations, he said, would help educate not only the nation's medical community on the practical aspects of smallpox immunization but also the public.

If the peacetime group suffers a couple of deaths, "there will be a lot of publicity and concern," Dr. Henderson said. "It's a question of how people are going to respond."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biowarfare; health; populationcontrol; smallpox; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: cajungirl
Check this out. Here we go.
61 posted on 07/07/2002 9:05:47 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
The reason is that the vaccine supply in our nation is sequestered by an obtuse process. The Clintonistas created a vaccine supply review process that limited the supply of anthrax and small pox vaccine for the citizens of our nation.

I certainly don't discount the real threat of bio-terrorism posed by malevolent regimes such as Iraq. However the Medi-scam Health Scare lobby in D.C. has damaged its own credibility by extending its twisted tentacles into non-medical issues. Until such time that the source of the anthrax terrorism is discovered and proven, I also do not exclude the possibility that it may have emanated from our own anti-bioterrorism research bureacracy, insanely seeking to expand its own world view and influence.

62 posted on 07/07/2002 9:07:31 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
The Russians?

No. We BOUGHT vaccine supply from the British and we have stockpiles for many millions of doses. They should be packaging the vaccine for distribution and making arrangements to move vaccine to the physician offices ASAP. I've not heard any official comment on these matters.

63 posted on 07/07/2002 9:08:03 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; FITZ
Yes, you'd need to keep the immunized person away from people with weakened immune systems.
64 posted on 07/07/2002 9:09:58 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
There is more evidence of foreign sources than it being from Fort Detrick. Do you agree?
65 posted on 07/07/2002 9:11:18 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
It's interesting how the government accepts abortion being a decision between a woman and her doctor but yet something like the smallpox vaccine cannot be allowed to be that kind of decision, for some reason the government thinks it must control who gets vaccinated and what must happen first.
66 posted on 07/07/2002 9:11:43 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
There is more evidence of foreign sources than it being from Fort Detrick. Do you agree?

No, I think the jury is still out.
Until such time as conclusive evidence is presented, I view both possibilities with equal suspicion.

67 posted on 07/07/2002 9:15:08 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I think this reflects the social engineering philosophies at the heart of the Democratic Party's most liberal activities. More importantly, there was a form of EUGENICS occuring in national healthcare policy during the 1990's.

I could probably write a book on the way national healthcare policy (written by DEMOn-cRATS) creates eugenics like activities...favoring survival and reproduction by people of certain races.

Scary isn't it.

68 posted on 07/07/2002 9:16:16 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If the gov't releases information on this matter, will you accept the gov't explanation when they make it?

I won't.

69 posted on 07/07/2002 9:17:11 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
BTTT
70 posted on 07/07/2002 9:20:28 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dtel
BTTT
71 posted on 07/07/2002 9:26:58 AM PDT by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
If the gov't releases information on this matter, will you accept the gov't explanation when they make it?

Only with harsh scrutiny, not at face value.

I see no reason to blindly trust an entrenched bureaucracy that's infested with immoral, pro-infanticide, "sustainable" zero-population-growth despots.

72 posted on 07/07/2002 9:30:14 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Bump and thanks for the links.
73 posted on 07/07/2002 9:34:42 AM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
...damaged its own credibility...

FYI, this is a term you need to be familiar with relating to you.

74 posted on 07/07/2002 9:36:19 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Thanks for providing so much information and thoughtfulness to this very important subject.

Who, does it appear that our government thinks, should make the very important decision as to whether the risks and benefits of my getting the smallpox vaccine warrant my being vaccinated?

a) President Bush

b) Tommy Thompson

c) Director of Homeland Security

d) Anybody But Me

e) All of the Above

If you guessed (d) or (e), DING!DING!DING!DING!DING!you win.

Why can't I in consultation with my doctor make that decision (other than the fact that WE don't have the vaccine). 30 years ago, we were required by law to assume the risks of the vaccination before we could go to public school, etc. Now with much more risk from the disease than has ever existed before in my lifetime, we are denied the right to take the risk of the vaccination in order to get its benefits. What changed?
75 posted on 07/07/2002 9:42:44 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
"30 years ago, we were required by law to assume the risks of the vaccination before we could go to public school, etc."

Being vaccine-impaired mentally, I was curious if the vaccines I recieved prior to public school in the early '60's are still coursing through my body, being effective, or have they lived their useful shelf life?
76 posted on 07/07/2002 9:49:00 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
FYI, this is a term you need to be familiar with relating to you.

I am straightforward and blunt in the expression of my opinions on this forum.
I have no problems defending my position, or retracting my statements if in error.
If you have some personal problem with that, I really couldn't care less.

77 posted on 07/07/2002 9:49:02 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
What changed?

What changed was Clinton federal rules.

78 posted on 07/07/2002 9:56:25 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dtel
I don't think that anyone has the answer to that question. I certainly don't. I assume and hope that I have some limited immunity which is badly in need of a booster. In the event of an epidemic, I would send out the person who has most recently been vaccinated for food, but that just reflects the reality of having to go with the odds, which we wouldn't have to do if our government allowed us to think and act for ourselves.
79 posted on 07/07/2002 10:06:57 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
I can't really agree. I can and have blamed Clinton for just about anything under the sun, but these decisions are being made by the Bush administration. We have the vaccine doses available right now. Why won't our government allow them to be disseminated to my doctor so that I can make the decision to be vaccinated?

Try as I might, I just can't blame Bill Clinton for this particular outrage.
80 posted on 07/07/2002 10:10:56 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson