Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A 'Marriage Strike' Emerges As Men Decide Not To Risk Loss
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | July 5, 2002 | Glenn Sacks and Dianna Thompson

Posted on 07/06/2002 5:00:19 AM PDT by buccaneer81

A 'marriage strike' emerges as men decide not to risk loss

By Glenn Sacks and Dianna Thompson

Katherine is attractive, successful, witty, and educated. She also can't find a husband. Why? Because most of the men this thirtysomething software analyst dates do not want to get married. These men have Peter Pan syndrome: They refuse to commit, refuse to settle down, and refuse to "grow up."

However, given the family court policies and divorce trends of today, Peter Pan is no naive boy, but instead a wise man.

"Why should I get married and have kids when I could lose those kids and most of what I've worked for at a moment's notice?" asks Dan, a 31-year-old power plant technician who says he will never marry.

"I've seen it happen to many of my friends. I know guys who came home one day to an empty house or apartment - wife gone, kids gone. They never saw it coming. Some of them were never able to see their kids regularly again."

Census figures suggest that the marriage rate in the United States has dipped 40 percent during the last four decades to its lowest point since the rate was measured. There are many plausible explanations for this trend, but one of the least mentioned is that American men, in the face of a family court system hopelessly stacked against them, have subconsciously launched a "marriage strike."

It is not difficult to see why. Let's say that Dan defies Peter Pan, marries Katherine, and has two children. There is a 50 percent likelihood that this marriage will end in divorce within eight years, and if it does, the odds are 2-1 it will be Katherine, not Dan, who initiates the divorce. It may not matter that Dan was a decent husband. Studies show that few divorces are initiated over abuse or because the man has already abandoned the family. Nor is adultery cited as a factor by divorcing women appreciably more than by divorcing men.

While the courts may grant Dan and Katherine joint legal custody, the odds are overwhelming that it is Katherine, not Dan, who will win physical custody. Overnight, Dan, accustomed to seeing his kids every day and being an integral part of their lives, will become a "14 percent dad" - a father who is allowed to spend only one out of every seven days with his own children.

Once Katherine and Dan are divorced, odds are at least even that Katherine will interfere with Dan's visitation rights.

Three-quarters of divorced men surveyed say their ex-wives have interfered with their visitation, and 40 percent of mothers studied admitted that they had done so, and that they had generally acted out of spite or in order to punish their exes.

Katherine will keep the house and most of the couple's assets. Dan will need to set up a new residence and pay at least a third of his take-home pay to Katherine in child support.

As bad as all of this is, it would still make Dan one of the lucky ones. After all, he could be one of those fathers who cannot see his children at all because his ex has made a false accusation of domestic violence, child abuse, or child molestation. Or a father who can only see his own children under supervised visitation or in nightmarish visitation centers where dads are treated like criminals.

He could be one of those fathers whose ex has moved their children hundreds or thousands of miles away, in violation of court orders, which courts often do not enforce. He could be one of those fathers who tears up his life and career again and again in order to follow his children, only to have his ex-wife continually move them.

He could be one of the fathers who has lost his job, seen his income drop, or suffered a disabling injury, only to have child support arrearages and interest pile up to create a mountain of debt which he could never hope to pay off. Or a father who is forced to pay 70 percent or 80 percent of his income in child support because the court has imputed an unrealistic income to him. Or a dad who suffers from one of the child support enforcement system's endless and difficult to correct errors, or who is jailed because he cannot keep up with his payments. Or a dad who reaches old age impoverished because he lost everything he had in a divorce when he was middle-aged and did not have the time and the opportunity to earn it back.

"It's a shame," Dan says. "I always wanted to be a father and have a family. But unless the laws change and give fathers the same right to be a part of their children's lives as mothers have, it just isn't worth the risk."

Dianna Thompson is the founder and executive director of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children. She can be contacted by e-mail at DThompson2232@aol.com. Glenn Sacks writes about gender issues from the male perspective. He invites readers' comments at Glenn@GlennSacks.com.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: donutwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-798 next last
To: edstet
I have to leave for work now. I will look over your post when I get back.
181 posted on 07/06/2002 9:36:27 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

Comment #182 Removed by Moderator

To: Taxman
The feminist inspired rise/ascent of the single mom has been the lefts most successful weapon against the U.S.!
183 posted on 07/06/2002 9:36:47 AM PDT by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
Gosh where have we heard that lately.
184 posted on 07/06/2002 9:36:49 AM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
I will give a major bump.

There is an infection among females particularly American ones. The vast majority are not worth bothering with.

I want to tell them, "I don't come in to help you clean up your personal act... You clean up your own act first, then I will think about joining up because of the fact that your act is together."

She will either contribute things, on equal turf, or I will leave.

Most and YES MOST, females (of my age group) have a serious 'blame the other guy', no respect, backbiting, inconsiderate, self centered, hate all men, mentality.

There are two types of contribution:

first type... being nice and respectful. Being happy. Having fun. Being intimate. Communication. All of these things are free and do not cost 10 cents.

Second type... washing dishes, 'having a baby', or cleaning the house, or for guys 'working all day'...

The second often get put into the first tier.

Things I will not do:

be accused
fight
argue
date the girl, and all of her friends also
I will not be in an unequal relationship

I can list a few more, but you get the idea... I have never been married, doubt I will. I have not been impressed.

185 posted on 07/06/2002 9:37:36 AM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
So, basically, I may never get married or have children because men are scared that I will divorce them and take everything we've worked for as a couple?

Gee, that's something to look forward to. >: /
186 posted on 07/06/2002 9:37:48 AM PDT by belleoftheball414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Mirage
You've contradicted yourself, unless women aren't female.

Ok, let's go through it again. It's not a hatred of women. It's being tired of their attitudes and actions - or are you saying that attitudes and actions cannot be changed?

So, where's the contradiction?

187 posted on 07/06/2002 9:40:07 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

Comment #188 Removed by Moderator

To: Dark Mirage
You don't get it. These posts ooze hatred and loathing. Women get worked over in divorces, too.

The only one oozing hatred and loathing is you. Grow up.

189 posted on 07/06/2002 9:41:07 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird
You didn't have a marriage and you agreed to this arangement before you even set up shop, ....you signed on willingly to this arrangement beforehand, there was no invisible ink, by your own words.

You seem rather full of yourself, deigning to define what a marriage is. By the laws of the country where we were married and the US states where both of us were from, we were most definitely married in every recognized legal way. The "invisible ink" I referred to in my post is the apparent treatment of marriage by most women these days as a paperwork drill or tax dodge.

What you got was what you both wanted so why blame her now for the lack of commitment you BOTH signed on for.

I don't recall "blaming" anyone for anything in my post, least of all my ex.

There are some wonderful treatments for reading comprehension problems now. You should consider them.

190 posted on 07/06/2002 9:41:18 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
A males instincts warn him that this is the case but in the rational west we are taught to ignore our ingrained biology.
191 posted on 07/06/2002 9:41:58 AM PDT by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: belleoftheball414
So, basically, I may never get married or have children because men are scared that I will divorce them and take everything we've worked for as a couple? Gee, that's something to look forward to. >: /

It's a shame, but it's a fact of life. I never thought it would happen to me and I was married twelve years. I would have to meet a truly exceptional woman to ever consider remarriage, and I still think I'd never expect it to last forever.

192 posted on 07/06/2002 9:42:16 AM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
What is it with these women...?
193 posted on 07/06/2002 9:44:49 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
bttt

Happy Birthday President Bush!

Don't miss this one.

194 posted on 07/06/2002 9:44:52 AM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #195 Removed by Moderator

To: Dark Mirage
who believes manhood is defined by misogyny

If you believe a robust discussion of a very real inequity within our legal system and the giving of examples is misogyny in action, you illustrate the very problem.
If you open your mind you'll hear that the posters wish for a fuller meeting ground for men and women than money provides.
Blind labelling won't bring you understanding.

196 posted on 07/06/2002 9:44:53 AM PDT by philomath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Dark Mirage
Yes. I contradicted all-knowing, all-powerful, should-control-everything men. That's hateful. I should just self-destruct.

Sounds to me like you already have.

197 posted on 07/06/2002 9:45:41 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Heartfelt bump bro.....40K per year in total for CS and add ons like summer camp, medical, dental, extras and plane tickets....all to a woman who remarried a much older fellow who makes several million per year and she has about a 10K/month expense account, servants, weekend trips to Paris for "shopping" ...you name it. My pittance to her which is punitive for me is simply extra spending money for her. They got married the day our divorce was final. I went thru the immediate restraining order crap and all sorts of other pleasantries.

Now 8 years later, she acts like the children are a bother but of course would never give them up because that would mean capitulating to me.

My life now with wife #2 is a wonder and very nice and easy and we have a 2 year old Tasmanian Devil and another in the oven. I'll be 50 when the next one enters grade school. Scary in a way. I'm very blessed now but God forbid should something happen to my current wife, I doubt seriously I would ever remarry. I have now almost 4 children and can't afford anymore hence, marriage beyond this current very satisfying one is holds little allure for me. Women will always hold an allure for me but marriage...no.

198 posted on 07/06/2002 9:46:00 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wondervixen
to be brainless and fall for a brute with muscles BECAUSE he's a "Bad Boy"

Ever dated a 'bad boy'? Ever liked a 'bad boy'?

Answer yes, I am am over an out. First date, second, or whenever, I am over and out. If she lies and waits until later to fess up, I will leave her for lying and for liking 'bad boys'.

199 posted on 07/06/2002 9:47:36 AM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
They will cost about as much as a luxury car, with some models being cheaper and some having more options.

Over the long term, that is much cheaper than losing all of your money and possessions to a money grubbing, scheming, untrustworthy woman.

And who knows, maybe Sony will invent a robot-woman that genuinely has the ability to love and that you can actually trust.

This may be a totally new invention, because the women I've seen just don't have the ability to love or to be trusted.

Maybe it's like the saying "All the good ones are taken," but maybe the truth is that there were not any good ones to begin with.

Anyway, I'm wishing the scientists and engineers at Sony the best of luck in their endeavours.

200 posted on 07/06/2002 9:49:24 AM PDT by Jedi Master Yoda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-798 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson