Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russians Want U.S. to Send Them to Mars (My title)
Associated Press ^ | 07/05/02 | Mara D. Bellaby

Posted on 07/05/2002 4:32:40 PM PDT by irv

Russia Proposes Sending Team to Mars

MOSCOW (AP) - Russian space officials proposed an ambitious project on Friday to send a six-person team to Mars by the year 2015, a trip that would mark a milestone in space travel and international space cooperation.

Russia's space program hopes to work closely with the American agency NASA and the European Space Agency to build two spaceships capable of transporting the crew to Mars, supporting them on the planet for up to two months and safely bringing them home, said Nikolai Anfimov, head of the Central Research Institute of Machine-Building.

The roughly 440-day trip is expected to cost about $20 billion, with Russia suggesting it would contribute 30 percent.

"It must be an international project," said Vitaly Semyonov, head of the Mars project at the M.V. Keldysha Space Research Center. "No one country could cope alone with this task."

Russian space officials said they are receiving encouraging signs of interest from NASA and European counterparts.

But NASA spokeswoman Delores Beasley said Friday that the Russians have not submitted any formal plan and that the agency would not comment on the proposed trip before then. Because of demands from Congress to scale back costs, human travel to Mars has not been on NASA's radar recently.

"We are still very far away," conceded Alain Fournier-Sicre, head of the European Space Agency's permanent mission in Russia. "But this kind of program is a long-term initiative for every space agency in the world," he said, adding that he held a meeting with Russian space officials this week to discuss the project.

Landing humans on Mars has long been a dream of Russian space scientists. But even in the heyday of the Soviet space program, when Moscow reported success after success, its attempts to reach the Red Planet were marked by failure. Soviet scientists began whispering about a "Mars curse."

The Soviet Union kicked off Mars exploration in 1960 by launching two unmanned spacecraft four days apart, but both failed even to make it as far as Earth's orbit. One resulted in an engine explosion that scattered debris and contamination over the Baikonur launch pad in one of the worst accidents in Soviet space history.

That was followed by repeated attempts and often repeated disappointment. The bad luck for Russia continued on Nov. 16, 1996, when the Russians launched an ambitious $300 million spacecraft, Mars 96, which they hoped would prove to the world that despite their economic struggles after the Soviet breakup, they could still run a first-rate space program. Mars 96 suffered an engine failure just after launch and crashed into the Pacific Ocean.

Anfimov said that despite the setbacks, "we never stopped planning and seeking opportunities to reach our next goal: Mars."

NASA's Mars program, plagued by its own series of setbacks, got back on track earlier this year when the unmanned Mars Odyssey spacecraft entered orbit around the planet and began mapping the mineral and chemical makeup of the surface.

Anatoly Grigoryev, director of the Institute of Medical-Biological Problems, which works with all of Russia's cosmonauts, said Russia's plan calls for a cargo and a manned ship, which would consist of a commander, a second pilot, a flight engineer, a doctor and two researchers. Three members of the team would descend to Mars, while the other three would remain onboard the ship in orbit.

Grigoryev said the trip could answer many of the remaining questions about Earth's mysterious neighbor.

"Is there life on Mars? If there is, what kind of life?" Grigoryev said, barely able to suppress his excitement. "This would be historic."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: mars; nasa; russia; spaceexploration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
The Russians have lots of ambition, but don't have the money or the know-how. NASA, lacks the money, the know-how AND the ambition. My bet: The Chinese get there first.

Someone, please prove me wrong.

1 posted on 07/05/2002 4:32:40 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: irv
"It must be an international project," said Vitaly Semyonov, head of the Mars project at the M.V. Keldysha Space Research Center. "No one country could cope alone with this task."

Speak for yourself rooskie. If you had the money, I'm sure you'd keep the Mars glory all for Russia.

2 posted on 07/05/2002 4:43:12 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
Somebody's been watching "2010" too much.
3 posted on 07/05/2002 4:47:15 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
"Is there life on Mars? If there is, what kind of life?" Grigoryev said, barely able to suppress his excitement.

Next time, try the wodka without the coffee.

4 posted on 07/05/2002 4:50:12 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
I believe Bush will announce a Mars expedition in the near future. The new Guy Sean O'Keefe at Nasa is better than the old Admin. Goldin, and the NASA budget is now putting big bucks in rocket engine technology. The most promising is the plasma-powered VASIMR, Variable Specific Magnetoplasma Rocket. There may be a flight test in 2004 on this engine. Do a google search on VASIMR, tons of stuff out there.
5 posted on 07/05/2002 4:53:43 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
"The Russians have lots of ambition, but don't have the money or the know-how. NASA, lacks the money, the know-how AND the ambition. My bet: The Chinese get there first."

Don't believe that---the Russians have LOTS of space know-how. They "do" lack money. I think a joint program of NASA, ESA, and the Russians would be a great idea. Russians are really good at BDB's (big, dumb, boosters) for putting lots of mass into space.

6 posted on 07/05/2002 4:54:42 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I believe Bush will announce a Mars expedition in the near future

They know they can go to Mars anytime and build permanent settlements since vast amounts of water have been discovered there. However, this Administration seems disinclined to do anything in outer space that is not directly related to national defense.

7 posted on 07/05/2002 4:56:19 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: irv

         Martian Flag
8 posted on 07/05/2002 5:05:05 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I hope that we go to Mars for four reasons.

Number one: The technology and the engineering needs to be done to make space ships for relatively long time durations in space. This is similar, to sailing across the Atlantic. Also we need the life support Technologies for these durations to help make mining on the Moon or the Near Earth Asteroids more feasible.

Number two: If the Russians pay a third of the cost with Cheap Oil to the US and Europeans pay a third, then we can get three trips for the price of one.

Number three: I know several out of work programmers and computer scientists that can get a job ;-)

Number four: It will drive the Martian Environmentalists nuts!

9 posted on 07/05/2002 5:37:25 PM PDT by WoollyRain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: irv
Hey thanks for the post.

I am writing a speech for toastmasters right now on this very subject.

I choose it because it is 'pose to be about something that we are passionate about.

Here is what I've got so far...

As a country we seem to be like the wife of an abusive husband waiting for her next beating.

Life has a certain feeling in the Western world of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

On top of it we have lost our technological edge. It was recently widely reported that the United States lost the title of the fastest engineered computer designs to a team of Engineers from Japan.

In fact they recently designed a Supercomputer that can process more calculations that 20 of our fastest computers combined.

Thomas Sterling, a leading super-computer designer at the California Institute of Technology, said: "These guys are blowing us out of the water, and we need to sit up and take notice."

We seem to teeter on our foreign policy goals.

Financially times are uncertain as well, everyone seems to be scared of losing their jobs. People realize that security doesn’t exist today as it did for their parents, when 30 years of working for a company brought one a gold watch and a healthy retirement check.

Just as at home our rest seems less restful, our enemies seem less clearly defined than they did in the days when there was just us and “the evil empire”.

What is it that we are lacking?

I ask you, the audience, and this isn’t a rhetorical question.

Yes, all good answers.

What we are lacking is a clear cut goal, and an initiative which harnesses our creative intelligence as a nation.

What should our goal as a nation be?

Well, survival is a goal and that seems to be what our goal has become. But like staying the number one global power, this is ineffective as a goal because it doesn’t give us any direction.

Motivation experts admonish us not to have a negative goal, Not I will not eat that ice cream and deserts but I will eat in a way to improve my health and my strength is better.

In looking for this national goal I am going to look at a national in our past that propelled us forwards.

In the modified words of John Fitzgerald Kennedy: “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out of landing a man on Mars and returning him to Earth safely.

Before you pronounce this idea as absurd, let me explain how this goal would address some of the concerns I mentioned earlier.

First of all, it is obvious to anyone that a strong American space program is the same thing as a strong America.

The military spin offs of space exploration are almost limitless. And it should be apparent that military technology proliferates.

If we rest on our laurels, our enemies will develop nuclear technology and missile delivery systems.

And the lesson of 9-11 is that our enemies are not resting on their laurels.

The driving force of the American economy is technological innovation. Many economists, while missing the massive fraud of the Clinton era, accurately said that the economy of the ninties was flat but the tech sector was so strong that it pulled the rest of the economy with it.

How did American become the world’s leading technical innovator?

I would argue that much of the impetus came as longterm spin off from the Apollo space programs and Reagan’s Star Wars initiative.

In addition to technology, many breakthroughs in the fields of engineering, medicine, plastics, aviation, and electronics came from these programs.

The problem currently is that corporations owe it to their shareholders to return profits in the current quarter. This stifles long term research and investment.

And since winning an election has become so expensive, politicians are more concerned about filling their campaign coffers than long term stragitey of anything outside political survival.

The investment in high tech research and manufacturing necessary to put a man on Mars would be a tremendous boast to the economy and have spin off effects for decades.

It would also help the increasing unemployment.

10 posted on 07/05/2002 5:55:53 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
I forgot to mention, any FREEPER feedback would be greatly appreciate.

Also this is a ROUGH rough draft.

11 posted on 07/05/2002 5:57:27 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; Wonder Warthog; demlosers; WoollyRain; Physicist; gcruse; anymouse; ...
My opinion? There was an active movement for Mars exploration in the 1970s. Nasa and others did many studies, wrote books and set the course for Mars. The space program however, has not survived the socialization of America, and I mean socialization as in socialist. You can't spend money on Mars exploration when you are giving it away via the WTO and IMF to third world countries ostensibly to raise their standard of living. It is not in the interest of the IMF or WTO to have America be the techological powerhouse it used to be, because it takes money away from their projects and makes the rest of the world jealous.

America has been shoved backwards technologically by these groups and by environmental groups who sue anytime anyone wants to create energy generation facitilities or water storage facilities. We are so busy trying to maintain a falling standard of living amidst the highest taxes ever paid by citizens, most Americans now would not be able to see the value of Mars exploration or settlement.

If Russia makes it there before us it will be on our dime and our technology and they will be laughing all the way there. If China gets there first it will be on our dime and our technology and they will be laughing at us all the way there.

Thats my opinion.
12 posted on 07/05/2002 8:20:29 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
And no, I don't think they'll share, when they get up there.
13 posted on 07/05/2002 8:21:28 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
China will get there first, and they will stay. The universe, or the solar system at least will be Chinese. Tortoise and hare. America isn't interested, they don't know what they want and they sure aren't looking beyond the next paycheck.
14 posted on 07/05/2002 8:59:50 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
However, this Administration seems disinclined to do anything in outer space that is not directly related to national defense.

Rumsfeld may even be smart enough to understand the simple truth that EVERYTHING in space is directly related to national defense, because if we do not command space, then we have conceded the high ground to someone else, and thus thrown away our status as a superpower.

15 posted on 07/05/2002 9:59:45 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: irv
Sure, except aren't there two Russians and one American on our Space Station right now????

Dump that turkey into the ocean, cut the huge loses and lets put an all American team on Mars.

ExNASA
16 posted on 07/05/2002 10:34:15 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"Sure, except aren't there two Russians and one American on our Space Station right now???? Dump that turkey into the ocean, cut the huge loses and lets put an all American team on Mars."

And WHERE exactly, do you think the hardware for any Mars expedition will be assembled, except at "that turkey"??. The "huge loses" (sic) are negligible next to the long-term benefits. So the space station costs a few billion bucks--that amount is not even a drop in the bucket of the federal budget. Hell, it's not even a drop in the bucket of the federal dollars lost to bad accounting practices.

17 posted on 07/06/2002 5:42:15 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; Wonder Warthog; demlosers; WoollyRain; Physicist; ...
I remember the sense of adventure that went with the Apollo program. These guys weren't boring PHD's, they were explorers. In my admittedly childish view at the time, they had more in common with Columbus and Vespucci than anyone else. And when Armstrong took his first steps on the moon, my father sat my brother and I down in front of our black and white TV and said to us "Remember this, because this is the most important thing that has ever happened!"

I get tears in my eyes even today, just thinking about it.

We all seem to share the feeling that our country has lost some of it's purpose. I think sending a man to mars may give us back some of that if NASA could just remember to remind us of the adventure. In today’s social state terms the cost would not be prohibitive for the US to do alone, and if we have the money, we will by definition acquire the necessary talent.

for myself, I can't tell you what it would mean to me to be able to sit my daughter down in front of our TV and say to her, "Remember this!"

18 posted on 07/06/2002 6:00:54 AM PDT by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
"We all seem to share the feeling that our country has lost some of it's purpose."

It wasn't "lost". It was MURDERED by a coalition of leftists, united largely by their hatred of the US (and themselves). That coalition was fostered by the Communist ideology, and has outlived the state Communism that financed it--becoming self-supporting through "tax-exempt foundations" like the P-yew (Pew) Foundataion and similar.

Now they infest all parts of our educational system, brainwashing the new generations of minds. One can only hope that there will be a "generational backlash" against them and their "group-think", as their ascendancy was a generational backlash against the WWII one.

19 posted on 07/06/2002 7:22:00 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
I would argue that much of the impetus came as longterm spin off from the Apollo space programs and Reagan’s Star Wars initiative.

Not only that, but together, they were critical in the winning of the Cold War.

Your list is fine, as far as it goes. However, these arguments have been made before and have fallen on deaf political ears. Fundamentally, the challenge to space enthusiasts is to concoct a politically viable rationale for a vigorous space program. National defense is certainly the right direction, but going to Mars has little value in that regard. Better to use a national security rationale to develop a cislunar space transportation infrastructure. If we can get that, the planets (all of them, not just Mars) become more easily accessible.

20 posted on 07/06/2002 7:36:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson