Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Like Vidal, I'm a small-government Jeffersonian Republican. I don't agree with the current expansion of our government nor our many overseas adventures either.

And for G-d's sake, why are we contemplating invading Iraq when it was Saudi money, men and religion that bombed the WTC? Start there.

1 posted on 07/05/2002 11:10:05 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bloggerjohn
Now THAT'S hyperbole.
2 posted on 07/05/2002 11:19:38 AM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
And for G-d's sake, why are we contemplating invading Iraq when it was Saudi money, men and religion that bombed the WTC?

Because Islam is a religion of peace. Even though 90%+ of Islamists approve of the September 11th atrocity against America. And even though Islam was founded by a demon-possessed, mass-murdering pedophile. And even though the goal of most Islamists is to kill anyone who is not.

But if that were not the case, we could start with the center of the universe, the Ka 'ba in the heart of downtown Medina.

3 posted on 07/05/2002 11:21:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
Truly bizarre.

First he says that the Afghans had nothing to do with the attacks.

Then that the attacks were a warning to us not to invade Afghanistan.

Big companies had a deal with the Taliban, so they decided to invade their business partners. Wouldn't it have been a lot cheaper to just follow thru on the deal?

I especially liked the part about us installing the Taliban at the time of the Russian occupation. The Taliban didn't exist till years after the Russkies pulled out.
5 posted on 07/05/2002 11:25:51 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
Gore Vidal, "The Last Defender of the American Republic"?

lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololol

7 posted on 07/05/2002 11:27:47 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
"And for G-d's sake, why are we contemplating invading Iraq when it was Saudi money, men and religion that bombed the WTC? Start there."

OK. Why do the two have to be connected?

Interesting article on govt., domestically. Otherwise lety drivel looking ever more incompetent, missing facts, wrong in many places, e.g., "Caspian" "Oil" "aid". Despite 9/11, this article shows that Vidal is maintaining an anti-American narrative. The interviewer invites him with the question about "other evils" to acknowledge that other people have interests and motives that are not merely responsive to alleged American evils. He deflects in standard lefty ways, avoiding religion, avoiding motives, centering on "Osama" and not the beliefs of the organization. "Guatamala" didn't bomb us, but this is a standard liberal-left deflection - reciting lefty hangups in order to seem "intelligent" while avoiding analysis of teh present crisis.

In fact, I'm surprised Vidal is actively deflecting these issues - it's like active disinfo. He's agendized despite his protests otherwise. I guess the America as the center of all evil is too ingrained into the lefty identity to give up. European papers? He's just reading narrow lefty garbage that makes him feel good. Seems the invocation of the word "Unocal" is cathartic for them. One can learn more facts about Qaida in USA Today.

BTW, this interviewer got Robert Fisk to say in this small California newspaper that Arafat was a "very immoral man." Not something Fisk tells his audience in those esteemed Western European papers.

9 posted on 07/05/2002 11:41:04 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
Jefferson was a "meddler" and promoted U.S. land grabs of North American Indians' territories. It was his bright idea to establish outposts and associated forts on the frontier, to loan goods to Indians, who, when the hunting season was not good, had to give up "title" to their lands which had been used as collateral for the loan of goods (which were usually tools and such requirements for the hunting season).

Earlier on, during George Washington's second term in office, Jefferson's followers were ardently in support of the French Revolution --- cheered the massacres of French culture --- participated in covert aid to the French Navy at sea, and generally violated the neutrality Proclamation prohibiting such acts.

12 posted on 07/05/2002 12:20:40 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
Hate America First, by Gore Vidal:
I was in Guatemala when the CIA was preparing its attack on the Arbenz government [in 1954]. Arbenz, who was a democratically elected president, mildly socialist. His state had no revenues; its biggest income maker was United Fruit Company. So Arbenz put the tiniest of taxes on bananas, and Henry Cabot Lodge got up in the Senate and said the Communists have taken over Guatemala and we must act. He got to Eisenhower, who sent in the CIA, and they overthrew the government. We installed a military dictator, and there's been nothing but bloodshed ever since.

This event was the watershed for nearly every subsequent protest by the leftist liberals in the Americas (including the U.S.) and was pointed to over and over as the great evil of American patriotism; it has been thrown around every program of socialist interest on college campuses ever since; it is popular among the left-winger-weenies as the calling card or ID card of the politically correct's assertion that the United States of America is the enemy to be hated.

I may strongly disagree with even more such "businesses practices" than has Mr. Vidal, but his ill will toward Americans trying to defend themselves against the ultra-coercions of the nationalizing socialism(s) which he and his followers have favored, has constantly overlooked that very horror, such as this, which we still struggle against --- what the leftists have manifested; see: The U.S. case against the court (ICC) is bogus on its face., Minneapolis Star-Tribune, July 2, 2002, by editorial staff (posted by wallcrawlr). My reply there:

Why is there no mention of the truly large atrocities committed by the extreme left-wing in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune?

Will Castro and the communists of Cuba be arrested?

Will the communists of Southeast Asia be arrested?

Will the communists of Asia be arrested?

Heart of darkness: Cambodia's Killing Fields

 August 8, 2001 [CNN online]

By CNN's Joe Havely

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia -- The fields of Choeung Ek on the outskirts of the Cambodian capital, Phnom Penh, carry a dark secret.

Across the baked earth scraps of cloth and human bone poke through the soil and are slowly bleached white by the harsh tropical sun.

In the center stands a glass-walled shrine containing more than 8,000 skulls -- the remains of just a few of those who died here.

These are the Killing Fields of Cambodia.

Here, just a few kilometers from the center of Phnom Penh, tens of thousands of people met their deaths -- entire families wiped out.

Many of those killed were intellectuals or trained professionals -- people considered counter-revolutionaries by the Khmer Rouge leadership bent on turning Cambodia into a [communist, socialist, leftist, fascist] peasant's paradise. (In " [ ] " --- mine, F_S)

Towards the end of its rule, as the regime became increasingly paranoid and turned on itself, many once senior Khmer Rouge cadres also met their end at Choeung Ek.

Men, women and children -- some just a few months old -- were killed here, often in the most violent and brutal ways.

With bullets in short supply, the condemned were forced to kneel before an open grave then stabbed through the head with a sharpened bamboo stake ...

Reign of terror


The fields of Choeung Ek contain more than 100 mass graves

In the corner of the field stands a tree ...

Against its trunk the heads of babies were smashed by young men brainwashed into believing their actions would free Cambodia from colonial imperialism ...

Reuters contributed to this report.


14 posted on 07/05/2002 12:34:31 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
What tripe!
17 posted on 07/05/2002 1:53:39 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
It would appear that Gore Vidal is a very queer fellow.
21 posted on 07/05/2002 4:10:45 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
"Like Vidal, I'm a small-government Jeffersonian Republican. I don't agree with the current expansion of our government nor our many overseas adventures either."

Vidal is no Republican, nor does he favor 'small government'. He wouldn't know a Republic if it bit him in the a$$.

--Boris

22 posted on 07/05/2002 5:05:23 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bloggerjohn
Vidal is a POS. Has been this way for many years. His only fame is in NYC and with outlanders who look up to NYC libs to show them the way.
29 posted on 07/06/2002 9:18:30 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides; Plummz; Nita Nupress; mancini; thinden; rdavis84
marking!
30 posted on 07/06/2002 9:18:45 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson