[alaskanfan]

When that happens, don't be surprised to find the Opecker Princes funding these enviral organizations world wide to prevent drilling for natural gas and oil in places like Alaska to increase the dependence on Opecker oil.

Good point. I'd never even considered that possibility. I would be interested to see where these enviro-organizations funding comes from.

[Grampa Dave]

After we boot a lot of Rat senators out of office, a nice 2003 bill would be to ban any non profit from political contributions without a look back at past contributions, present and future contributions if they have contributed or plan to contribute to any political campaign. If they contribute even a $ to any future political campaign, they would have to open up their books for 20 years and future years re who is contributing to their cause.

When Da$$hole et al stopped any drilling in ANWR, Alaska, who were the winners when we did nothing to decrease our dependence on Opecker Oil? Do the elite super rich rats of the senate ever do anything without getting paid. So would the likely suspects be, if they block drilling for new oil in Alaska to lower our dependence on Opecker Oil?

Since the days of Jimmy Carter, the envirals have worked 24/7/365 to decrease our own oil productions, which has increased our dependence on Opecker Oil. Who or what group has benefited from the increased dependence on Opecker Oil?