Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alaskanfan; BOBTHENAILER; madfly; brityank; CedarDave
After we boot a lot of Rat senators out of office, a nice 2003 bill would be to ban any non profit from political contributions without a look back at past contributions, present and future contributions if they have contributed or plan to contribute to any political campaign. If they contribute even a $ to any future political campaign, they would have to open up their books for 20 years and future years re who is contributing to their cause.

When Da$$hole et al stopped any drilling in ANWR, Alaska, who were the winners when we did nothing to decrease our dependence on Opecker Oil? Do the elite super rich rats of the senate ever do anything without getting paid. So would the likely suspects be, if they block drilling for new oil in Alaska to lower our dependence on Opecker Oil?

Since the days of Jimmy Carter, the envirals have worked 24/7/365 to decrease our own oil productions, which has increased our dependence on Opecker Oil. Who or what group has benefited from the increased dependence on Opecker Oil?
32 posted on 07/04/2002 10:19:39 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave
And they file frivilous lawsuits for the price of a postge stamp.
33 posted on 07/04/2002 10:28:27 AM PDT by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson