That depends on how good the cross-exams are, how good the rebuttle witnesses are..and the closing arguments... They can demolish the testimonies of defense witness, make the facts clear if the defense gets the facts muddied with confusion...and more. So I would wait until it's all over, and the jury is deliberating..
The muddling of fact seems to have come from the prosecution, why did the DA's computer guy slide on the date and times of the files ?
and what about the story of Brenda in the shower, no-wait Brenda and Danielle gave Babs & Denise a "boo" from behind the car (it really scared them) ?.
or the 5 party-hearty gang showing up at your house to eat leftover pizza, then leave after twenty or thirty minutes ?
The whole case smells.
So I would wait until it's all over, and the jury is deliberating..
Well, that's always good advice.
Feldman has pretty much defused the anger over the child porn; he can now paint the scene in favor of DW without the prejudice.
On cross-exam, the lawyer is limited to testimony given by that witness, they can't introduce new facts or questions not already given.
Feldman didn't get his JD from a Cracker-Jack box, he won't give Dusek or Clark the room to go out fishing for damage control.
With the weak case presented so far --I'll bet Feldman has another notch on his belt.