The muddling of fact seems to have come from the prosecution, why did the DA's computer guy slide on the date and times of the files ?
and what about the story of Brenda in the shower, no-wait Brenda and Danielle gave Babs & Denise a "boo" from behind the car (it really scared them) ?.
or the 5 party-hearty gang showing up at your house to eat leftover pizza, then leave after twenty or thirty minutes ?
The whole case smells.
So I would wait until it's all over, and the jury is deliberating..
Well, that's always good advice.
Feldman has pretty much defused the anger over the child porn; he can now paint the scene in favor of DW without the prejudice.
On cross-exam, the lawyer is limited to testimony given by that witness, they can't introduce new facts or questions not already given.
Feldman didn't get his JD from a Cracker-Jack box, he won't give Dusek or Clark the room to go out fishing for damage control.
With the weak case presented so far --I'll bet Feldman has another notch on his belt.