Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush s Insider Connections Preceded Huge Profit On Stock Deal
Center for Public Integrity ^ | July 3, 2002 | Knut Royce

Posted on 07/03/2002 5:57:58 AM PDT by noescape

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2002 5:57:58 AM PDT by noescape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: noescape
Welcome to FR today.
2 posted on 07/03/2002 6:00:32 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noescape
First post here at FR, eh? Did you have breakfast with Adam Clymer this morning?
3 posted on 07/03/2002 6:02:16 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
We have a self-confessed "I was in Vietnam, no I wasn't" named nohorse trashing Bush...

And now we have noescape doing the same thing. The other guy registered June 30th.

Gosh, maybe I'm just paranoid...

4 posted on 07/03/2002 6:02:34 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I am not trashing Bush. I simply posted an interesting and informative article.
5 posted on 07/03/2002 6:05:48 AM PDT by noescape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noescape
Remember Hillary's 900 FBI files? Remember the pardon of the Hassidic Jews who delivered all the votes for her? Remember the false charges against Billy Dale? Remember who illegally rifled through Vince Foster's office the night he died?

Or is your memory a little more selective than that?

6 posted on 07/03/2002 6:06:18 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
C'mon, you know anytime these DU fools think they have an edge they start climbing out of the woodwork...why they do it, I don't get it...remember when Enron first hit? Or after the "Bush Knew" crap?
7 posted on 07/03/2002 6:06:53 AM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noescape
Other than the Harkin deal, which the SEC investigated and is well known in Texas, none of the other information even seems odd.

Where's the beef?

8 posted on 07/03/2002 6:09:20 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
At least Bush isn't Martha Stewart.

BTW, has AlGore found the meaning of 'is' yet? Last I heard he was still searching.

I did like AlGore personality #87 better than the last personality #88. Maybe some day he will figure out who he is.

But welcome. Didn't read past the first line, so if there was anything useful, maybe someone else will point it out.

tarpon
9 posted on 07/03/2002 6:09:37 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noescape
A person can change his ways. Clearly George Bush has. Let us see what he does, his actions since beginning his run for Governor of Texas, and perhaps before are of a man who learns from mistakes, and acknowledges them, at least, by no longer engaging in them, or supporting them.

Thanks for the article.

10 posted on 07/03/2002 6:10:18 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noescape
I'm waiting for the part where it said that Bush obstructed justice or otherwise tried to sandbag the SEC probe.
11 posted on 07/03/2002 6:10:20 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
It's like trying to get rid of a fleas.
12 posted on 07/03/2002 6:11:23 AM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noescape
There is no escape from your asylum.
13 posted on 07/03/2002 6:11:27 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noescape
I am not trashing Bush. I simply posted an interesting and informative article.

Uh-huh. Sure. Right. Whatever you say, boss. Yup.

14 posted on 07/03/2002 6:11:51 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The Center for Public Integrity is supported by contributions from foundations, individuals, revenue from the sale of publications, and editorial consulting with news organizations. The Center does not accept advertising or contributions from corporations, labor unions, and governments. Current IRS guidelines do not require nonprofit organizations with 501(c)(3) filing status to publicly disclose their sources of support. In the interest of public disclosure, the Center has chosen to provide the following list of institutions and individuals that contributed more than $500 in 2001.
  • Fred and Blake Albright
  • The Arca Foundation
  • Brodie Price Philanthropic Fund
  • The Carnegie Corporation of New York
  • Dr. Micheal W. Casey
  • The Nathan Cummings Foundation
  • Victor Elmaleh Foundation
  • Edith and Henry Everett
  • The Ford Foundation
  • Foundation Open Society Institute
  • The Goldman Environmental Foundation
  • Andrew and Jamie Gagarin
  • Robert Giles
  • Hafif Family Foundation
  • The Jeff B. Harmon Trust
  • The Joyce Foundation
  • John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
  • The Fanny and Leo Koerner Charitable Trust
  • William S. Lee
  • Arthur D. Lipson
  • Donna Mae Litowitz
  • The Low Wood Fund
  • The John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • William and Gail Mattsson
  • The Giles W. and Elise G. Mead Foundation
  • Stewart R. Mott Charitable Trust
  • The John & Florence Newman Foundation
  • The New York Community Trust-The Atlantic Fund
  • Frances C. Nyce
  • The Open Society Institute
  • Park Foundation, Inc.
  • Nick Penniman
  • The Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Charles Piller
  • The Popplestone Foundation
  • Princeton Class of 1969
  • The Ruben and Elisabeth Rausing Trust
  • Rockefeller Family Fund
  • Rockefeller Financial Services
  • The Scherman Foundation, Inc.
  • Schuckman Peace Foundation
  • Ben Sherwood
  • The Streisand Foundation
  • Mark Thompson
  • Town Creek Foundation, Inc.
  • Cynthia M. Von Maerstetten
I always enjoy reading propaganda produced through the ministrations of the Ford, Rockefeller, and Streisand Foundations. Not to mention the Pew Charitable Trusts.

A whiff of desperation is in the air, blowing in from the left...

15 posted on 07/03/2002 6:12:32 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: noescape
From now on, we will be seeing an orchestrated attempt to erode the President's high poll numbers. This is just part of the DNC's talking points that will be hammered on until the fall elections.

16 posted on 07/03/2002 6:12:56 AM PDT by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noescape
noescape . . . member since July 3rd, 2002
17 posted on 07/03/2002 6:13:14 AM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snooker
OK. Here is the useful line from the article:

"After the SEC ended its investigation, according to one of its memos, the regulators concluded that Harken and Bush were unaware of the magnitude of the write- downs until at least mid-July, or after Bush’s stock sale."

18 posted on 07/03/2002 6:16:48 AM PDT by Freemyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: noescape
1) Author and poster unclear on the concept of a blind trust; probably unclear on the concept of compound interest, as well, but no way to tell, really.
2) Eaten up with envy, a cardinal sin I must point out.
3) Basic assumption is that anyone who makes money is suspect. The more successful you are, the more evil you must be. In other words, diametrical opposite of Protestant ethic.
Conclusion, nasty piece of work, not fit to shine the President's shoes. Probably a loser, too, as these envious types tend to be.
19 posted on 07/03/2002 6:17:25 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon; noescape
Securities and Exchange Commission records suggest that Bush, a company director who sat on Harken’s audit committee and was a paid consultant to the firm, may nonetheless have been unaware of the sleight-of-hand accounting or, for that matter, other significant company actions

Even the author of this would-be hit piece begrudgingly acknowledges an investigation indicated Bush didn't know anything about the "sleight-of-hand" accounting. So where's the beef? Is the best the Dems can do - accusing with innuendo whenever the evidence just isn't there?

20 posted on 07/03/2002 6:17:52 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson