The bottom line is NOT that there was no indictment-the BOTTOM line was that clinton was not willing to GET AN INDICTMENT with the help of the Sudanese. I saw this interview-this ambassador actually was allowed to visit TWO terrorist training camps and reported this in person to the clinton administration officials who decided to DO NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The first excuse I heard of why the clinton s did nothing to get Osama was that there was no interest on the part of the American people. WHAT LEADER WAITS FOR THE PEOPLE TO SHOW INTEREST before HE OR SHE ACTS RESPONSIBLY? I thought at the time that was the sickest, sorriest excuse I had ever heard and felt SORRY for the parents who had lost children to Osama's filthy prior attacks.
Now that I know it is FACT that the clintons refused to take Osama because a formal indictment was not prepared....I just wonder WHY one wasn't.
The clintons, in a way, by this very action, were responsible for 9/11/ And they KNOW IT.
Well, this is a bit of a problem for the Clintonites, isn't it? Sure, you can always use the "nuts and sluts" defense against one person, but two people saying the same thing is really quite problematic.
After all, it's not as though Billy has the apparatus to spin himself out of this one. And even the liberal networks are lagging!
I know! It's got to be a... conspiracy! Part of the new right-wing cabal dedicated to destroying the legacy of The Stainmaster and his sycophantic minions!
Probably because bin Laden paid them big bucks not to.