Perhaps. I hope your feelings in this matter are at least as strong as your feelings with regard to American voter decisions to elect Bill Clinton president not once but twice. And I hope you would not blame those of us who voted otherwise (Bush 92/Dole 96/Bush 2000 in my case) for the eight years of scandel, national security failures, and embarrasment that plagued the nation because of he and his anti american lawyer friends. I suspect you do not. I hope you at least see the inconsistancy in your posiion towards the "employees".
Enjoy the remainder of the holiday.
FRegards,
The election of Bill Clinton was testimony to the lackluster Bush41 campaign and the populist spirit of Perot's gang. Perot basically wanted to prevent a second term of Bush41. He succeeded in convincing 1/3rd of the nation that Bush should not be re-elected.
If the DNC introduces a populist 3rd party candidate to run on a conservative platform and swing enough votes from Bush43, they could recapture the White House. Certainly Ralph Nader is an unlikely recipient of my praise for running in 2000. Nader likely is responsible for swinging enough Gore votes in Florida to change the election results.
I never criticize the outcome of fair elections. When the people speak, they have made their verdict clear. There was no question that Bush 41 lost the confidence of the American people because of the glitz and glamour techniques of the liberals in the DNC and their celebrity pool.
I hold these actors (more like clowns) responsible for their conduct. Their duplicity in Hollywood is not unlike the guilt by association that occurs when the gunner claims the commandant made them do it.
The reality is that the excuse of following orders didn't work at Nuremburg but many appear to think that it should. If more German citizens had arisen in the late 1920's, one wonders if the racist policies of the Nazi's would have occurred. One wonders if the Holocaust would have occurred if citizens in Germany were permitted freedom of thought, identification of propaganda, and open public discourse while the Final Solution was being drafted.
I see little difference between the activity of the propagandists at DNC and of the early Nazi party. The propaganda techniques are virtually identical. They both use film to alter the nation's culture. They both have racist public policies in their attempts to do social engineering and selective vote acquisition.
Take care and thanks for the interesting discussion.
The election of Bill Clinton was testimony to the lackluster Bush41 campaign and the populist spirit of Perot's gang. Perot basically wanted to prevent a second term of Bush41. He succeeded in convincing 1/3rd of the nation that Bush should not be re-elected.
If the DNC introduces a populist 3rd party candidate to run on a conservative platform and swing enough votes from Bush43, they could recapture the White House. Certainly Ralph Nader is an unlikely recipient of my praise for running in 2000. Nader likely is responsible for swinging enough Gore votes in Florida to change the election results.
I never criticize the outcome of fair elections. When the people speak, they have made their verdict clear. There was no question that Bush 41 lost the confidence of the American people because of the glitz and glamour techniques of the liberals in the DNC and their celebrity pool.
I hold these actors (more like clowns) responsible for their conduct. Their duplicity in Hollywood is not unlike the guilt by association that occurs when the gunner claims the commandant made them do it.
The reality is that the excuse of following orders didn't work at Nuremburg but many appear to think that it should. If more German citizens had arisen in the late 1920's, one wonders if the racist policies of the Nazi's would have occurred. One wonders if the Holocaust would have occurred if citizens in Germany were permitted freedom of thought, identification of propaganda, and open public discourse while the Final Solution was being drafted.
I see little difference between the activity of the propagandists at DNC and of the early Nazi party. The propaganda techniques are virtually identical. They both use film to alter the nation's culture. They both have racist public policies in their attempts to do social engineering and selective vote acquisition.
Take care and thanks for the interesting discussion.