Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ladies, put your razors away: Women should embrace body hair
The Western Front ^ | June 27, 2002 | Dana Carr

Posted on 07/02/2002 9:21:16 AM PDT by Olydawg

Women on campus and everywhere should put away their razors and reclaim their body hair this summer.

The woman who chooses to give up shaving doesn't just save herself some time, money and skin irritation, she can discover the sense of personal acceptance, freedom and natural beauty that her body hair can bring.

Women are compelled to shave more in the summer as their legs, armpits and bikini lines become more regularly exposed.

Women don their shorts, skirts, tank tops and swimming suits and try their best to sustain a standard of hairlessness that is inextricably tied to American society's perceptions of beauty and femininity.

This standard is symbolically oppressive and absurdly impractical, but American women willingly persist in the 20th-century tradition of shaving.

American women did not remove underarm or leg hair prior to 1915 because full-coverage clothing styles made these areas rarely visible, according to an article, by Susan A. Basow, in the Psychology of Women Quarterly entitled "The Hairless Ideal: Women and Their Body Hair."

As skirts got shorter and silk stockings became fashionable in the 1920s, advertisements began to encourage women to "smooth away" body hair that was described as unwanted and ugly. The majority of American women have been shaving ever since.

An American woman begins shaving as an adolescent rite of passage into the world of womanhood, a habit that is adopted and unquestionably upheld.

Society teaches her that shaven legs and arms and a well-maintained bikini line are essential to feeling beautiful, feminine and sexy.

She believes she must strive for hairless glory as a necessary part of maintaining her sex appeal and attracting and pleasing men.

But is there really anything intrinsically attractive or sexy about a woman's lack of body hair?

Shaving commonly causes cuts, scrapes, razor burn, dry skin and ingrown hairs. These skin afflictions are not only irritating and painful, but are unnecessary and unattractive.

In addition to the physical hazards involved, shaving is a symbolically unsettling practice.

According to Basow's article, "As middle-class white women moved out of their 'separate sphere' of domestic life ... the removal of body hair may have served to maintain a distinction between the genders and de-emphasize women's adult status."

The presence of body hair is an indicator of a woman's sexual maturation. Removing it denies that maturity and independence.

Women should look like women, with their hair growing where it's meant to grow.

Basow wrote that hair removal symbolizes "that a woman's mature sexuality is controlled at the same time as her 'tamed' sensuality is on display."

On a more practical note, shaving and hair removal in all its other forms wastes time and money. Five minutes of shaving on 100 sunny days add up to more than eight hours of skin scraping.

Couldn't women better spend that time enhancing who they are instead of taking away from it? Rather than being trapped in the shower shaving, women could be frolicking in the sunshine or reading in the shade.

At $1 or $2 per razor head, women spend their money on yet another frivolous beauty product marketed with and sold off of the idea that women need to buy items to make them beautiful.

Despite all the symbolic, financial and time-related reasons not to shave, many women shy away from the possibility or don't even consider it because they fear the stereotypes often associated with women who do not shave.

They do not want to be viewed or labeled as the organic, tree-hugging, penis-loathing, militant, lesbian feminist.

They do not want to go against the norm or draw negative attention to themselves, so it's easier to remove socially unacceptable body hair than have to explain it.

"Although shaving, for most women, is habitual behavior and usually viewed as trivial, the intense social reaction to violations of this norm emphasize its power," Basow wrote.

Women need to critically consider why they battle nature by removing their body hair and decide what it means to them.

They need to realize that their body hair can be a liberating and valuable element of their bodies and lives.

A woman's body hair is not a hindrance to her femininity; it is a symbol of her sexual maturation and womanhood.

The woman who gives up shaving is one step closer to learning how to truly accept and love her body the way it is.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: armpithair; bikiniline; france; howtorepelmen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last
To: Phantom Lord
I grow a beard twice a year. In the fall for hunting season and in the spring for hockey playoffs.

Belfour to the Leafs . . . CuJo to the Wings . . . should be interesting next year.

221 posted on 07/03/2002 5:39:49 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
NP is way too skinny for me.....kinda cute, but doesnt get me there....
222 posted on 07/03/2002 5:40:08 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
So much for Detroits confidence in Manny Legace.
223 posted on 07/03/2002 5:44:34 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
Man that girl is fugly....
224 posted on 07/03/2002 5:46:41 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
We have a huge goaltending problem ourselves here in Boston. Shields is not the answer...
225 posted on 07/03/2002 5:48:04 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
NP is way too skinny for me.....kinda cute, but doesnt get me there....

Me neither, but Humbert was a perv.

226 posted on 07/03/2002 5:48:32 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
No freeper males Will dance or dine Accompanied by A porcupine! BURMA SHAVE

This calls for Haiku!

No bikini line

with armpits like balls of twine

No Freep men for them

227 posted on 07/03/2002 5:48:45 AM PDT by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
The presence of body hair is an indicator of a woman's sexual maturation. Removing it denies that maturity and independence. Hmm ... can't the same be said for beards on men?

Yes, it is the same thing. For thousands of years, in most countries of the world, women did not shave. In the larger scheme of things, it was a few men, trying to sell a few products in the 20th century, that required women to be artificially and superficially changed by removing their body hair. Many men "say" they want a real, natural, genetic woman, but in reality, they dont. They want something artificial that looks like a Barbie doll.

228 posted on 07/03/2002 6:00:04 AM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
MY EYES! ARGHH!..............
229 posted on 07/03/2002 6:06:57 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
It's odd that you say that Natalie is too thin, yet her and Anna are virtually the same weight, and Anna is 4 inches taller.
230 posted on 07/03/2002 6:07:06 AM PDT by splach78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: splach78
One looks skinny, the other, Athletic....
231 posted on 07/03/2002 6:16:49 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

P.S. At 5'8" and smoothly muscled, I have a hard time buying that posted weight of 112....I'm thinking 125 or so...
232 posted on 07/03/2002 6:19:31 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
In the larger scheme of things, it was a few men, trying to sell a few products in the 20th century, that required women to be artificially and superficially changed by removing their body hair.

God bless those men, including the greatest of them all, Mr. Hugh Hefner.

233 posted on 07/03/2002 6:51:06 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
I can't believe that Chelios would leave the Wings for a lousy half mil. I guess he didn't want two cups.
234 posted on 07/03/2002 7:19:21 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Next thing, 'dingle berries' will be all the rage across college campus' in this great land, me thinks not.
235 posted on 07/03/2002 7:20:56 AM PDT by Delmont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
It'd be easier to take all these beards, but I notice that men scratch and claw at them all the time. Makes me think of fleas...few men look good in beards, and the current fu manchu makes most men's faces look either skinny-satanic or pudgy.
236 posted on 07/03/2002 8:34:43 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Barbie Doll--does sound like someone wanting a little girl...the ARab women depilate all over. They like their little child-brides in Arabia.
237 posted on 07/03/2002 8:36:32 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Goatees are the current "cool thing" for men to have. Bunch of sheep. Personally, I have had one for 9-10 years. Long before the trend started and I will have it long after.

Plus theres an 'extra-stimulation' factor to 'em.

238 posted on 07/03/2002 8:37:55 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Olydawg
Hell hath no fury like a militant lesbian shorn.
239 posted on 07/03/2002 8:54:55 AM PDT by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olydawg
I guess she discovered this is the next best thing after going topless. Be one of the guys at last. Way to go grrls!!! You've come a long way, baby! ;-)
240 posted on 07/03/2002 8:57:40 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson