[SauronOfMordor]

Since President Bush has stated we are not at war against Islam, you might want to hound him, too, to see if because he is against anti-Muslim bigotry therefore he must support gang rape, as if gang rape and Islam are synonymous

I would hound Bush too, if he seemed curiously unwilling to answer a simple question, and preferred to dance around it instead of just forthrightly making a statement.

There seems to be a great reluctance on the part of certain posters to make a simple statement of condemnation regarding a (fellow?) Muslim. After a while, one would start concluding that there was some sort of religious prohibition against condemning a Muslim

[strela]

There seems to be a great reluctance on the part of certain posters to make a simple statement of condemnation regarding a (fellow?) Muslim. After a while, one would start concluding that there was some sort of religious prohibition against condemning a Muslim

And one would be egregiously wrong if one came to such a conclusion. One might even be rightly accused of not knowing how to read or comprehend simple English.

[swarthyguy]

"one would start concluding that there was some sort of religious prohibition against condemning a Muslim"

Of course there is if you are a "true" muslim. Look at the ones who condemn the nutcases; they're all under some fatwa, living in fear, or away from their home countries.

Even their sycophants in the US media, ala Ibish or Hooper refuse to condemn atrocities, and when they do, it's in such a pro-forma, mealy-mouthed, wishy-washy manner that you are left there wondering if the words meant anything at all.