Australian newspaper, possibly British journalist (???).
1 posted on
06/30/2002 9:37:31 AM PDT by
ginle
To: ginle; Orual; aculeus; general_re
Of course it did, said the Doormouse.Dormouse. It's spelled that way for a reason.
2 posted on
06/30/2002 9:44:12 AM PDT by
dighton
To: ginle
This guy needs to get off the island continent and travel more. I suggest a whirlwind tour to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Israel with Islamists as his hosts. It's easy for snot nosed, limey journasts to take pot shots at GW while partaking in tea and crumpets between naptime dreams of buggering young boys.
3 posted on
06/30/2002 9:45:42 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
To: ginle
It's just more of the same old tired talking points passed around by "Snake-Head" Carville and "The Rat" McAullife.
At least the writer finally realizes that Tom Cruise is an idiot. Maybe he'll stay in England this time, since apparently he doesn't realize that British street crime is rapibly catching up to (or has already exceeded) the the American variety.
4 posted on
06/30/2002 9:47:32 AM PDT by
jimtorr
To: ginle
THE world outside the US is now getting used to the fact Americans have a fraudulently elected nitwit as their president No, No, Bruce, Gore LOST the election.
Now, Tom Cruise is not a Grade A rocket scientist. In fact, he is a Grade A Scientologist. On the whole, though, I would say he was brighter than George W. Bush (along with my neighbour's catatonic cat) and it was most intriguing that he named corporate crime as a reason not to want to grow up in America.
You're right on that one. Cruise is smarter than your neighbor's cat (I think). I disagree with you about W. though.
He is a Texan (although not by breeding) and there they let things take their course, execute mentally deficient minors, and generally behave like good old boys...
Stay out of Texas, Bruce!! Your life could be in danger.
To: ginle
I've been reading a couple of threads today and it's dawning on me that perhaps it is time for Bush to sit down and take stock of the situation, to apraise who actually is an allie by it's actions, and who are allies in name only.
6 posted on
06/30/2002 9:52:09 AM PDT by
ginle
To: ginle
Seesh, what an article.
It sounds like a promotional piece for Chapter Seven (The Joy of Arguing with Liberals...'You're Stupid') of Ann Coulters new book.
To: ginle
Since then, though, what? On this side of the Atlantic he is seen as a kind of strange joke. Britons try to understand him, but in Europe they simply think of him as a sort of circus act.
From what I've seen, that's how Europeans see Americans, period. That's been true for years, no?
And if you think Bush's pronouncements are unreasonable, you have to have been brainwashed by Arafat and friends. Can Israelis, in all fairness, accept a known terrorist as the head of the new Palestine? I couldn't, and I don't think you could either.
D
To: ginle
Australian newspaper, possibly British journalist (???).From some of the statements, you are probably correct. However, the Australians seem to have a fair dose of Anti-American sentiment. I spend a lot of time in Thailand and have learned to avoid European andAustrailian travelers. They say< , "Oh, are you American?" when you say yes, you are frequently subjected to a spew like this article until you rudly excuse yourself (rather than punching them as you really wish).
9 posted on
06/30/2002 10:21:51 AM PDT by
JimSEA
To: ginle
"Now, Tom Cruise is not a Grade A rocket scientist. In fact, he is a Grade A Scientologist. On the whole, though, I would say he was brighter than George W. Bush (along with my neighbour's catatonic cat)"I'm sure you would, Bruce. But Tom is not as bright as George W. Bush. Neither are you, as you have amply demonstrated.
George Bush is a great man and a brilliant man--in contrast to you.
Your article demonstrates this contrast far more certainly than you would wish.
To: ginle
Max Barfbag (and toilet) alert.
To: ginle
If the 20th Century has any lesson at all to teach, it is to not listen to Europeans.
17 posted on
07/01/2002 3:47:17 PM PDT by
El Sordo
To: Admin Moderator
Why is this 6 year old, low post article listed under “Popular Articles” on June 7, 2008?
19 posted on
06/07/2008 8:36:03 PM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson