To: swarthyguy
bump.
2 posted on
06/29/2002 4:50:28 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: swarthyguy
4 posted on
06/29/2002 9:58:41 PM PDT by
Cindy
To: swarthyguy
Is this paper actually in Pakistan?
Brave honest soul...
6 posted on
06/30/2002 3:30:42 AM PDT by
DB
To: swarthyguy; monkeyshine; ipaq2000; Lent; veronica; Sabramerican; beowolf; Nachum; BenF; angelo; ...
In this ploy to divert the attention of the exploited masses away from their misdeeds, the rulers, in many cases had the assistance of extremist Muslim (Islamist) clerics who had total control of the pulpits in millions of mosques around the world. From these pulpits, the Islamists declared that all the miseries in the Muslim world are because of the Judeo-Christian conspiracy against Islam. All the territorial conflicts and all political disputes were given the label of Judeo-Christian wars against Islam. From Indonesia to Indiana, China to Chechnya, Philippines to Pakistan, Afghanistan to America, every place became a battle front in a war between Judeo-Christian forces and Islam. The whole world was now a "House of War" (Dar-ul-Harb)
7 posted on
06/30/2002 3:40:06 AM PDT by
dennisw
To: swarthyguy
How many fatwas have been declared against Tashbih Sayyed?
To: swarthyguy
9 posted on
06/30/2002 5:07:00 AM PDT by
Stultis
To: swarthyguy
Re:
"Arab street" This term is so overused.
It's a flowery, distractive way to say "terrorist demands", without useing the term 'terrorist' or 'demand'. The 2 are indistinguishable.
The next time you hear an Osama-loving-sycophant-Arafat-apologist pundint using the term "arab street", swap it with "terrorist demands" and you'll find that they are one in the same.
'Arab street' = 'Terrorist Demands'
12 posted on
06/30/2002 8:22:57 AM PDT by
ChadGore
To: swarthyguy
Too many words (not even too much ado) for nothing!
The question right now is not how the Israelis are going to greet this acceptance, but how the common man on a Palestinian main street will react to it. - this is the first and second very false premises.
First of all, the plan belongs to non-existent entities - Clinton and Barak - and thus is totally irrelevant.
Secondly, Arafat himself is irrelevant, so his acceptance or unacceptance of anything has no significance at all.
As to the "Palestinian main street", the Palestinian leadership, either the current or any imaginable future, will continue to feed it with bl**-jobs as usual, not to listen to its opinion.
17 posted on
06/30/2002 5:20:55 PM PDT by
Neophyte
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson