Skip to comments.
Surreptitious Weapon Looks Like A Cell Phone: New Airline Security Threat
wnbc.com ^
| June 27, 2002
Posted on 06/29/2002 5:18:30 AM PDT by TomGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: Moose4
You wanna volunteer to prove your point?
To: det dweller too
Not leave a red mark? That's enough to break through the skin. All they need really.
42
posted on
06/29/2002 3:46:17 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: TomGuy
"I saw people with these little wands scanning the forehead of a bald man," Checking for thought crimes, obviously.
To: TomGuy
44
posted on
06/29/2002 9:31:53 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: TomGuy
LOL! How about a cell phone bomb.
To: robertpaulsen
assuming the 'antenna' functions as the barrel,
how do four inline shells fire without ejection/cycling ?
46
posted on
06/30/2002 4:08:37 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
I agree. Something's not right.
To: goldstategop
LOL! How about a cell phone bomb.
You just nailed my question. I recently read two books--fiction, okay. But they each had a scenario where a cell phone loaded with C4 was remotely detonated when a call was answered.
Is this plausible?
48
posted on
06/30/2002 7:48:55 AM PDT
by
scholar
To: Nubbin
ewwwww, lol.
To: det dweller too
>>>
Agree. 10 ft/sec is about 66 MPH. Not enough to even leave a red mark. <<< About is a wonderful qualifier ....and appropriate here!
88 ft/sec is exactly 60 miles/hour!
10 ft/sec is about 6.818181 miles/hour.
To: robertpaulsen; tomkat
From the first link in Post #22:
The mobile phone gun looks exactly the same as a normal mobile phone, with a keypad, liquid crystal display and aerial.
Inside, however, rather than wires, it contains a rudimentay spring-wound percussion mechanism which allows four .22 calibre bullets to be fired in quick succession from openings in the top the phone, each bullet being triggered by pushing a button on the keypad.
Although the gun-phones are more than capable of killing, their one drawback is that they are extremely inaccurate. "It's really very simple technology," says Gander. "Almost as soon as the bullet leaves the muzzle it becomes unstable, making it accurate only up to a couple of metres at the most. "Basically you'd have to go right up to your target and practically press the gun right against them for it to be effective."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson