Replies

Sorry, but I'm with the school on this one. If they can't stop a group from displaying graphic abortion photos on their own grounds, then they also won't be able to stop groups from displaying graphic photos of orgies, child sacrifice, mutilation, or anything else that is grotesque and offensive.

Its called decency and civility. If you want to be able to be able to restrict profanity, than it cuts both ways. I'm very pro-life, but the issue here goes beyond abortion. Of course the school would prefer that pro-life groups go away and be silent, but the tactics have forced this to become more about control over one's own property(the school's) and public civility.

BTW, sticking graphic photos in peoples faces without first giving them a choice is counterproductive. How is it any different from a liberal screaming cusswords at a family on a sidewalk or waving porn pictures in the faces of children? Should not a parent be able to control what their children are exposed to, don't we have the reasonable expectation of civility in public? If you disagree, then you can't complain about the polluting of the family hour on TV, or things like Nickelodeon running gay promotions disguised as 'discussions'. Can't have it both ways.