Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Says Court Ruling On Pledge Is 'Wrong'(Graham: Constitutional Amendment If Necessary)
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 6/26/02 | Jim Burns

Posted on 06/26/2002 3:17:41 PM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - The White House Wednesday called a California appeals court ruling on the Pledge of Allegiance "wrong," and announced that the Justice Department plans to take action.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the pledge is unconstitutional and should not be recited in schools, because the phrase "under God" violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

"The view of the White House is that this was a wrong decision and the Department of Justice is now evaluating how to seek redress," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.

"The Declaration of Independence refers to God as the creator four different times. Congress begins each session of the Congress each day with a prayer and our currency says 'In God We Trust,'" he said.

Fleischer emphasized that the decision is one from a circuit court that only affects nine states and not a national court decision.

"I think that people are very naturally ... going to react strongly opposed to this," he said. "I think this decision will not sit well with the American people and it certainly does not sit well with the president of the United States.

"I think most Americans have faith in God, and they are going to express [their faith] and the pledge everyday that they can," he said.

Meanwhile, Rev. Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition said the ruling should be a wake-up call for President Bush to appoint more conservative court judges -- even if it means bypassing the Senate.

"We can expect more anti-God decisions like the one just handed down by the judicial tyrants in San Francisco, if we don't get good conservative judges on the federal bench," Sheldon said. "Senators Daschle, Leahy, and McCain need to get out of the way and confirm Bush's nominees quickly.

"We're sick and tired of Tom Daschle blocking the confirmation of God-fearing judges like Charles Pickering," he continued. "Americans want men like Pickering on the bench who respect America's religious heritage and understand that we truly are a nation under God.

"If Senators Daschle, Leahy, and McCain don't get out of the way this week, I think it's time for President Bush to begin making recess appointments of his judicial nominees," he said. "Enough is enough!"

Rep. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, vowed to go a step further if needed.

"If necessary, I will offer a constitutional amendment to ensure Americans can voluntarily say the [Pledge of Allegiance] in public and private settings without being in violation of the law," said Graham.

"The reference in the Pledge to being 'one nation under God' is in no way the establishment of religion by the government. If America ever needed God's blessing and guidance, it's now," he concluded.

E-mail a news tip to Jim Burns.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last
To: mlo
As much as I respect Mr. Graham, this is stupid. The court ruling did not make it illegal for Americans to say the pledge, in public or private, on their own.

Maybe he's looking into the future.

21 posted on 06/26/2002 3:32:51 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks. I wonder why he hasn't done that already?
22 posted on 06/26/2002 3:33:28 PM PDT by BJClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Thanks, Julie....will do. :-)
23 posted on 06/26/2002 3:33:43 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"Why this is so difficult to grasp I do not know."

Because of public-school education. ;)
24 posted on 06/26/2002 3:34:28 PM PDT by Sid Rich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Maybe he's looking into the future.

If he thinks he is he's seeing phantoms. The issue here is well defined, it is not some slippery slope leading to something else.

25 posted on 06/26/2002 3:35:51 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
I agree. I told my Senators (Graham and Nelson) that I was no longer going to sit back and just "take it" like I did the 8 hellish years of Clinton. I told them, "I am TIRED of being told WHAT I can and cannot do, where I can and cannot do it, and I AIN'T TAKING THIS CRAP ANYMORE! The AMERICAN PEOPLE woke up on September 11th, and they're still awake. You better do something and do it fast."

Oh...it felt so good to spout that out. I did it civilly of course, not wanting to sound like a ranting, raving lunatic.

26 posted on 06/26/2002 3:37:02 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VOA
How's this for a devil's advocate position:

If there was ever any doubt how tightly the left has this society wrapped up, the proof is on this "issue". Conservatives going off thinking to themselves that they are taking "conservative" stances, not even realizing that by doing so, they are actually conceding to about 101 liberal policies and programs in the process.
Does anyone realize that by demanding that the pledge be returned to the public schools, you "conservatives" are conceding that:

1 Public schools have a right to exist

2. Public schools have a right to make attendance compulsory

3. Agents of the state have a right to "educate" children

4. Agents of the state have the right to userp parental rights.

5. Agents of the state have the right to make parental decisions.

I could go on and on. This pledge issue is nothing but a distraction. It will make for good talk radio for a few days, but it is really irrelevant to real conservative issues in the long run.

27 posted on 06/26/2002 3:38:50 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
I'm sure that did feel good, and I sympathize with the frustration, but don't you realize that this decision does NOT tell you what you can or can't do?
28 posted on 06/26/2002 3:39:52 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This court decision just shows how stupid judges can be. The Founding Fathers never envisioned a godless republic. Any judge who thinks so hasn't done his homework.
29 posted on 06/26/2002 3:40:03 PM PDT by etcetera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo
If he thinks he is he's seeing phantoms. The issue here is well defined, it is not some slippery slope leading to something else.

Get back to me in twenty years.

30 posted on 06/26/2002 3:40:44 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Why is anyone acting surprised by this? It is the inevitable evolution of state-sponored atheism. If God has no place on our courthouse lawns or our schoolhouse walls, what makes you think He has any place in our oaths of allegiance?

The next step is to have Him removed from our coinage. And, since the motto on our Great Seal -- annuit coeptis -- means "Heaven smiles on our endeavors, the Great Seal must be changed too, along with all 1-dollar bills on which it is depicted.

God must be erased from our culture. Just think of all the harm He has done. What place does God have in a Christian nation anyway?

31 posted on 06/26/2002 3:40:56 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo
You might have missed the lawyer on MSNBC who said, when asked by the anchor, "What about the US currency? Do these same two judges and the man that filed suit plan to not use our currency because on the back it has "In God We Trust"?" Do you know what this ACLU lawyer said????

"WELL, THAT MIGHT BE NEXT."

You think this is the end of it? Wrong. The liberals will do anything to take the word GOD out of our lives if we let them. We cannot. This is OUR country. Our forefathers are probably rolling over in their graves.

32 posted on 06/26/2002 3:41:33 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Isn't that the most overturned appeals court in the country?
33 posted on 06/26/2002 3:41:40 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I don't think I could have said that any better if I tried, so I'll just say ditto. As a southern boy, that "indivisible" part of the Pledge (among others) bothers me.
34 posted on 06/26/2002 3:41:46 PM PDT by Sid Rich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DJ88; Howlin; Miss Marple; rintense
Feinstein said that she is holding the 9th Court of Appeals together and was embarrassed by this ruling. Isn't she along with Boxer the ones that kept Cong Chris Cox from being nominated to this Court of Appeals? I thought of that coming back fromt he grocery a few minutes ago.
35 posted on 06/26/2002 3:42:09 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
Thank you.
36 posted on 06/26/2002 3:42:30 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Yes, she is.

And Dog said this guy filed suit last year to keep Bush from saying the oath at his inauguration!

37 posted on 06/26/2002 3:42:59 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"I'm sure that did feel good, and I sympathize with the frustration, but don't you realize that this decision does NOT tell you what you can or can't do?"

Don't you understand that if my children were going to public school, which thank God they are not, that they would not be allowed to recite the Pledge of Allegiance? This idiotic ruling handed down today by two liberal leftist judges told this country NO MORE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IT'S UNCONSITUTIONAL. What don't YOU understand about that???

38 posted on 06/26/2002 3:44:10 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
"WELL, THAT MIGHT BE NEXT

And that has what to do with a constitutional ammendment to preserve "under god" in the pledge of allegience?

39 posted on 06/26/2002 3:44:17 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sid Rich
No wonder our country is in the shape it's in. Our constitution has been trashed, our rights trampled, freedoms revoked, private property violated, and THIS is what gets "conservatives" riled up? The plegde of allegiance? No wonder they have won, and we have lost.
40 posted on 06/26/2002 3:44:44 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson