Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9TH CIRCUIT COURT: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Fox News ^

Posted on 06/26/2002 11:25:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,461-1,477 next last
To: Howlin
We have a RIGHT to say it.

That's right .. Hello ... First Amendment

321 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:39 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: CecilRhodesGhost
There should be massive civil disobedience to this monstroous decree!
322 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:40 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yes, he says he is "praying" and that he hopes God will protect him and his family..he prays!

sw

323 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:44 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
HERE IT COMES: Hannity saying this is DASCHLE'S fault for holding up the nominations.

Let Daschle say this is a great ruling!

324 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Triple
It was the creation of a Baptist socialist as I recall, but the K of C made it "unconstitutional" by getting "under God" included.
325 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:51 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Yes, but kids are forced to go to school until the age of 16.

326 posted on 06/26/2002 12:17:59 PM PDT by truth_session
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
There is cause for outrage because the court does not understand the meaning of th First Amendment. It does not support a separation of church and state.

Thank you. There is additional cause for outrage because the court obviously does not know the difference between simple English words like "establish", "endorse", and "acknowledge", either.

327 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:32 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
This is the most amazing piece of cr@p (excuse my language ) that has been wrought by a Court since Roe v. Wade.

Terrorists have a right to not be interrogated...kids can be killed in uteroe, and last, but not least,...the Pledge Of Alliegence is illegal.

Talk about a Klintonian legacy.

328 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:39 PM PDT by beowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Tom Dasshole wants more of these judges!

Which is why this opinion is the best thing the 9th Circuit could have done for the president's judicial nominees. This lemon will soon be lemonade, if we seize the opportunity.
329 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:41 PM PDT by scalia_#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I'm curious what happens when the teacher is a Jehovah's Witness, whose religion forbids pledges to flags. Does a student lead the class in the pledge?

Well maybe that teacher should (1) rethink s/his profession, or (2) rethink what s/he is willing to do. The Pledge is hardly a religious creed or something. Geezus.

What really chaps my Republican a$$ is when folks think they have the almighty Gawd-given RIGHT not to ever ever be offended. There's a such thing as good sportsmanship.

330 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:43 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

Wrong. The 1st Amendment says (in part) "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

The difference may be subtle, but the way you have it, religion itself is referenced (THE establishment of religion). The way it is written, it refers to any specific church (AN establishment), forbidding Congress to favor one church over another. Of course, neither way does it mandate a separation of church and state.

This may be picky, but to me the Constitution is a sacred document.

331 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:47 PM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The Ninth Circuit Court is one of the, if not the worst courts in the nation. It has sticken down more conservative legislation than any other I can think of. Anytime the Libs have a problem they turn to this court to strike it down.

Proposition 187 and others have seccumed to it's anti-American slant. This is nothing new. It's simply another reason to percieve them for what they are.

332 posted on 06/26/2002 12:18:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat; Joe Brower; afraidfortherepublic; cake_crumb; 4TheFlag
IN ALL WESTERN STATES. That's a pretty far reach for some communist judges. All because of one seven year old girl who "felt bad in Frisco. Dad just got his 15 minutes of fame. THE JUDGES NEED TO BE RE-CALLED OR IMPEACHED. This gives a great opening for extremist Islamic Fundamentalists and WHAT'S NEXT? THE MONEY? ANY MENTION OF GOD? WHAT HAPPENED TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION?

We have to contact all our congressman and senators, president and vice president AND EXPRESS OUR EXTREME DISPLEASURE. Phone call EVERYONE!!!!! What a crock!

333 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:20 PM PDT by floriduh voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Yes, he says he is "praying" and that he hopes God will protect him and his family..he prays!

He said that???

334 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:21 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: katya8
The words Eisenhower so arrogantly added in 1954 - the "under God" words, are indeed unconstitutional and need to be removed, because they make a large segment of the population feel extremely uncomfortable, and those people are just as much TRUE AMERICANS as you are!

No one has the right to not feel extremely uncomfortable. Those who don't want to recite the pledge are perfectly within their rights to shut their yaps while the rest of us recite it.

Those words will stand, whether by a USSC decision, or just by acclamation.

This decsion is unenforceable.

335 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:29 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin
I will offer to dispose of all your money please forward it to me.....can't have you walking around with illegal IN GOD WE TRUST tainted dollars.....:-)
336 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:29 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Judge Alfred T. Goodwin Alfred E. Newman

337 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:39 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Civil disobedience? Maybe. But this will maybe blow over by the time public schools re-open in the autumn.
338 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:42 PM PDT by CecilRhodesGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Would that be Urge Overkill University or Oregon?
339 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:56 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Maybe the Constitution is illegal!Someone needs to appeal it before these AIRHEADS.
340 posted on 06/26/2002 12:20:02 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,461-1,477 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson