Skip to comments.
What is the worst war movie ever made?
My Brain
| 6/25/02
| Burkeman1
Posted on 06/25/2002 4:43:34 PM PDT by Burkeman1
What is the worst war movie you have ever seen? Your reasons can be political, realism, historical innaccuracy, or a mixture but what is the worst?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: movies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-230 last
To: ko_kyi
Worst War Flick-"Combat Squad" starring John Ireland and Lon McCallister, made for a buck and a half...
Best-"A Walk in the Sun" starring Dana Andrews, John Ireland, Directed by Lewis Milestone
221
posted on
06/26/2002 9:31:12 AM PDT
by
morjon
To: BureaucratusMaximus
Didnt read "war" movie...sorry :(
But the Pallbearer IS the worst movie of all time.
To: hole_n_one
Have you seen her lately?
To: ArrogantBustard
I wasn't too bad on this until they had the homing torpedoes. You should do some research. The US Navy fielded the Mark 27 passive acoustic homing torpedo in 1943; however it was only used by Pacific theatre submarines. The Kriegsmarine also developed them for u-boat use. HERE are pictures of the Mark 27. Cute little thing, no?
I would still be surprised to find that torps in WWII could vary their depth and do all the things the ones in the movie did.
Walt
To: PJ-Comix
Thank you for the insight. I will avoid the older film and get the book.
225
posted on
06/26/2002 10:42:48 AM PDT
by
Blennos
To: WhiskeyPapa
do all the things the ones in the movie did. I don't recall what the homing torp in U571 did; I wouldn't be surprised if they wildly exaggerated its capabilities. The Mark 27 was a short-range self defense weapon for submarines. It homed on surface ship screw noise, and saw successful use in the Pacific theatre against Japanese ASW ships. I believe it "varied" its depth more or less monotonically from 400 ft up to zero, at which point it went "BANG!" and caused an IJN destroyer captain suddenly to lose interest in that pesky submarine...
AB
To: PJ-Comix
The Battle of the Bulge movie also makes no mention of the heroic support provided by Patton's Third Army. Kind of like having a Civil War movie without mentioning Lee or Grant. Only in Hollyweird.
227
posted on
06/26/2002 11:11:55 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: ArrogantBustard
I don't recall what the homing torp in U571 did; I wouldn't be surprised if they wildly exaggerated its capabilities. The Mark 27 was a short-range self defense weapon for submarines. It homed on surface ship screw noise, and saw successful use in the Pacific theatre against Japanese ASW ships. I believe it "varied" its depth more or less monotonically from 400 ft up to zero, at which point it went "BANG!" and caused an IJN destroyer captain suddenly to lose interest in that pesky submarine... I appreciate your note. That is all very interesting.
Walt
To: wtc911
Thank-you....it's been driving me crazy!
To: SoCal Pubbie
Richard Roundtree plays a US soldier killed midway in the movie, who somehow returns later in the film with no explanation! Never seen it but it sounds terrible! Does he return in his Shaft persona?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-230 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson