Replies

No prob. When the jury was dismissed today we all thought that was it for court. Then I alerted everybody that Feldman was getting a real dressing down by Judge Mudd. The Judge was very upset. From my post #535:

Judge Mudd told Feldman that they had hearings about the porn and they had agreed to limit images to show jury. Then Feldman represented to the jury that what was shown to them was all that was found. That is NOT the case and the Judge just ruled that Feldman opened the door and the prosecution gets to show and tell the jury just how much and what was found. They had limited it to avoid prejudicing the jury----Mudd just directed prosecutor to mark them for the record and they're all admissable.

Then Feldman represented to the jury that what was shown to them was all that was found. That is NOT the case and ...

Thanks for the clarification. How many images did Feldman say there was, and how many are there really?

Heres the problem. I am positive I heard the prosecution mention more than once the "100,000" porn images found. The judge did not order that they opened the door for all to be admitted by mentioning how many they found. So it seems the prosecution opened the door concerning the 100,000 figure. Of course feldman would mention the figure to his advantage.