Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hair in Westerfield home similar to Danielle's: (6-25-2002 Van Dam vs. Westerfield Trial Coverage)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | June 25, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 06/25/2002 9:30:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Hair in Westerfield home similar to Danielle's

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- A police criminalist testified Monday that tiny pieces of evidence ---- hairs and carpet fibers ---- found in David Westerfield's house and motor home could link the Sabre Springs man to Danielle van Dam, the 7-year-old neighbor he is accused of kidnapping and murdering.

Tanya DuLaney, a trace evidence analyst with the San Diego Police Department, said blonde hairs, dog hairs and tan carpet fibers found on Westerfield's property were similar to Danielle's hair, the short brown-gray fur of the van Dam family dog and Danielle's bedroom carpet.


DuLaney said she could not make a 100 percent match of the hair and fiber evidence.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping and murdering Danielle. The young girl was reported missing Feb. 2. Her nude and decomposing body was found nearly four weeks later in rural East County.

Westerfield, a twice-divorced design engineer, kept his hands clasped in front of him during Monday's proceedings, occasionally writing notes and consulting with his attorneys.

Danielle's mother, Brenda van Dam, attended the entire hearing. The van Dams live two doors down the street from Westerfield and were passing acquaintances with him. Damon van Dam sat with his wife during the morning session.

Day 12 of Westerfield's trial was dominated by the hair and fiber testimony of DuLaney, who told jurors that light brown-blonde hairs found in Westerfield's motor home and house were similar to Danielle's hair in color, length, diameter. Westerfield has short, dark hair.

Jurors heard testimony that DNA evidence will show Danielle could have left the blonde hairs found on sheets and pillow cases taken from Westerfield's master bedroom ---- the first possible evidence placing the second-grader upstairs in his home.

"They could have come from Danielle van Dam," DuLaney said of tests performed on the hairs. "All six of them."

Further testimony on the hair samples is expected today or later this week when prosecutors are expected to wrap up their side of the case.

Meanwhile, Westerfield's defense attorney, Steven Feldman, focused on what didn't match, having DuLaney go over hair after hair found in the motor home ---- some brown and others color-treated blonde ---- which were determined not to be Danielle's because of color, length or dye.

Earlier in the trial, Brenda van Dam testified her daughter's hair was never dyed and Danielle had a haircut about a week before she disappeared. Van Dam also had testified she took Danielle to Westerfield's house to sell Girl Scout cookies a few days before Danielle disappeared. She testified her daughter went into the house briefly, but did not go upstairs.

The tedium of the fiber and hair testimony prompted Judge William Mudd to give jurors an extra long afternoon break.

Feldman followed the same line of questioning with the carpet fibers, asking about fibers that didn't match. He called attention to a lack of physical evidence putting Danielle in Westerfield's black Toyota 4Runner, the car Westerfield drove when he went to get his motor home on Feb. 2 ---- the morning Danielle was discovered missing.

None of Danielle's hair or blood was found in the vehicle, another police criminalist, David Cornacchia, testified. Nor were any of the carpet fibers lifted from the soles of Westerfield's 25 pairs of shoes similar to Danielle's bedroom carpet, DuLaney said.

Also on Monday, DuLaney told jurors about finding five carpet fibers in Westerfield's motor home that were similar in size and shape to Danielle's bedroom carpet.

She showed jurors enlarged pictures, showing the fibers side by side with those from Danielle's bedroom and magnified 400 times, to illustrate how the fibers were consistent.

Under questioning from Feldman, Westerfield's defense attorney, DuLaney said it was possible that many houses in a development like the Sabre Springs neighborhood where the van Dams and Westerfield lived could have the same carpet.

She also talked about dog hairs found in dryer lint thrown away in Westerfield's garage. More hair was found in the hallway carpet of his motor home, on a bath mat in the motor home and on a white towel. Those hairs were consistent with the hair on van Dam's dog, Leyla, DuLaney testified. Westerfield does not have a dog.

Brenda van Dam testified earlier in the trial that her daughter would often roll around with Leyla, especially after she had changed into her pajamas before going to bed.

While the dog hair found in Westerfield's house and motor home had the unusual pigment formations found in Leyla's hair, DuLaney said she could only say the hairs were similar, not exact matches.

Attempts to perform DNA tests on the hair were unsuccessful, said Holly Ernest, director of the UC Davis veterinary genetics lab. She briefly testified that there was not enough DNA on the dog hair sent to the university for testing to determine whether it belonged to Leyla.

Feldman did not ask Ernest any questions.

Testimony in the case continues today.

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

6/25/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 901-906 next last
To: Rheo
Red fibers looked visually similar but further comparison showed they were not...Lost feed again so not sure which location had fibers that were compared.
101 posted on 06/25/2002 11:31:30 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Going to "dark medium brown, course hair found on Danielle"...Compared the hair to DW and evaluated that it EXCLUDED Westerfield as the donor.

Anyone want to guess WHY the red acrylic fibers on the victim and her environment weren't important enough to follow up on????

sw

102 posted on 06/25/2002 11:31:36 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: BigBlueJon
The bean bag is cream colored....the infamous missing, never mentioned as collected as evidence dog bed color is unknown...the orange carpet is similar to DW's bedroom, I think?..missed some of that testimony.
103 posted on 06/25/2002 11:31:48 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I keep losing feed, and did court tv host just say that ALL the hairs in danielles ahnd were not her own or dw's?
104 posted on 06/25/2002 11:32:40 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Huh??

sw

105 posted on 06/25/2002 11:32:49 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
Hair in Daniele's hand different from one on her body. DW and Danielle are excluded as source of this hair.
106 posted on 06/25/2002 11:33:01 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Danielle did try on clothes that same day at Mervin's. Maybe she tried on something acrylic and orange. Acrylic Fibers from clothes could have collected in her necklace.

Bad news for DW, then, because those orange fibers were on every bit of his laundry plus on his bedsheets and pillowcases.

107 posted on 06/25/2002 11:33:26 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Thanks for the info. I don't know if I missed it or not, but has any one in court just asked if Westerfield has anything of this color in his home?
108 posted on 06/25/2002 11:34:29 AM PDT by BigBlueJon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
No reason that DW should expect that the prosecution's evidence is going to help him!

I agree the evidence seems to be getting stronger, but I don't think we've reached critical mass yet. Also, atleast 30 days of defense to go.
109 posted on 06/25/2002 11:34:59 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: GoRepGo
Hair under Danielle's armpit - similar to Danielle's hair.
110 posted on 06/25/2002 11:35:11 AM PDT by GoRepGo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
hmmn - only one orange fiber on Danielle - on her necklace - now I'm thinking it could have come from the cookie sale day somehow - if she never took the necklace off - and it had only been a few days since the visit. I hope we get to find out the source of that orange fiber.
111 posted on 06/25/2002 11:35:41 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Catch you all later...sw
112 posted on 06/25/2002 11:36:02 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Would not want to guess on why they weren't followed up on!

the dark brown hair was labeled that way by collector...she as hair examiner states the hair was med brown going to blonde at end...(armpit hair)

113 posted on 06/25/2002 11:36:43 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: GoRepGo
Thanks rep..between commercials on CTV and the breakups on realaudio..it's hard to keep up
114 posted on 06/25/2002 11:37:40 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Would not want to guess on why they weren't followed up on!

Did anyone else hear her say that while the red fibers were similar visually, further examination showed they were not?

115 posted on 06/25/2002 11:38:29 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
witness thinks orange fiber likely came from blanket or sweater? DW afghan didn't match.
116 posted on 06/25/2002 11:38:40 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"Made your day, huh KIM?"

If you didn't mean it as inflamatory as it sounded, I'm sorry I reacted. Just trying to save our threads. I had to beg bigtime to get the other one back.

117 posted on 06/25/2002 11:39:54 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
afghan collected from storage container in Poway (dw's)...evaluated..spent 2 days on it...fibers were not similar to those of victims neck, or laundry.....fiber on necklace was actually tangled in hair which was tangled in necklace...large wad of hair tangled in necklace
118 posted on 06/25/2002 11:39:56 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mommya
Due to where the fiber was---tangled in her necklace amongst hair tangled there----I find that hard to believe.

Witness testifying as I type that a "wad" of hair had the fiber tangled within it and she thinks it reasonable that the fiber came to be there close in time to her ending up at site where she was found.

119 posted on 06/25/2002 11:40:49 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
That's what I heard too.
120 posted on 06/25/2002 11:41:52 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 901-906 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson