Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Going against the flow
Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2002 ^ | 25 June 2002 | PHILIP BALL

Posted on 06/24/2002 4:49:28 PM PDT by AndrewC

Going against the flow

Heat can flow without temperature differences - but thermodynamics remains intact.
25 June 2002

PHILIP BALL

With the right rachet, heat can flow from one hot place to another
© Getty Images

Physicists have devised a way to dodge one of the most fundamental laws of nature: the fact that heat flows only from hot to cold. At face value, it implies they have invented a never-ending source of energy. Well they haven't - but it could provide a method for carrying out unheard-of chemical reactions.

By imagining two chambers containing particles, Souvik Das of St Stephen's College in Delhi, India, and colleagues say that they can make heat flow between two identical systems1. But the laws of thermodynamics say that this cannot happen, as heat must always flow from hot to cold, just as water must run downhill.

To make their claim, Das and colleagues invoke 'non-thermal', reservoirs, which do not have a meaningful temperature that can be measured with a thermometer.

This isn't quite as bizarre as it sounds. Lasers are very similar. An object's temperature is related to the way in which its energy is distributed among its constituent particles. A warm gas is made up of atoms or molecules with a normal distribution of energies - a few are cold, the majority is warm, and a few are very hot.

Just like the gas, the non-thermal reservoirs considered by Das' team also consist of particles with a range of different energies. But the distribution of energies is no longer normal. The fictional reservoirs contain an inordinately large number of high-energy particles and - as is the case with lasers - are not in equilibrium.

Das and colleagues find that as long as the two reservoirs are not in equilibrium, heat can flow between them - but a return to equilibrium would stop the flow of energy between the reservoirs. Because it costs energy to keep them in the non-equilibrium state, no energy is obtained 'for free' and the laws of thermodynamics stay intact.

Cranking out the heat

The heat flows down a theoretical 'conductor' made a chain of particles rather like ball-bearings. As in Newton's famous cradle, energy is transmitted from one particle to the next by collisions between them. Das' team shows that if the masses of these particles decrease from left to right, energy flows along the chain preferentially in this direction.

A heavy particle is relatively efficient at transmitting energy down the chain to a lighter particle, whereas the energy picked up from a reservoir by a light particle is mostly reflected back to where it came from. So the heat transport is asymmetrical, like the motion of a ratchet.

This 'heat ratchet' will not provide us with inexhaustible energy. But the researchers claim that it may be possible to build one anyway. If two chambers containing heat-generating chemical reactions (which are out of equilibrium while the reaction proceeds) can be connected by molecular-scale wires, it should be possible to see heat flow in the wrong direction.

 
References
  1. Das, S., Narayan, O. & Ramaswamy, S. A ratchet for heat transport between identical reservoirs. Preprint, (2002).


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: chemistry; crevolist; entropy; heat; physics; thermodynamics
Imagining another broken law from some Indian law breakers.
1 posted on 06/24/2002 4:49:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; Doctor Stochastic; Physicist; RadioAstronomer; longshadow
Ping. Ratcheting up the pressure or Maxwell's demon does exist.
2 posted on 06/24/2002 4:52:08 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
How about carbon nanotubes? Could they act like a chain of decreasing size ball-bearings?
3 posted on 06/24/2002 4:55:09 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I don't know about the nanotubes, but something out of equilibrium has usable energy in it somewhere.(my conjecture)
4 posted on 06/24/2002 5:09:11 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
What law is supposed to be broken here? The experiment seems in accord with ordinary thermodynamics.
5 posted on 06/24/2002 7:54:27 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
This is a theoretical result, not a lab result. It also doesn't violate anything because the more energetic reactions are proceeding toward the less energetic reactions -- as is normal. By mixing reactions in a non-bell shaped distribution, they arrive at funny averages (the thermometer temperature) but this seperation cannot be sustained except by energy input.

So no laws of thermodynamics are being broken. Not a one.

6 posted on 06/24/2002 7:57:24 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan; Doctor Stochastic
This is a theoretical result, not a lab result

Why do you gentlemen have such a problem recognizing sarcasm?

Physicists have devised a way to dodge one of the most fundamental laws of nature
Imagining another broken law from some Indian law breakers.
Ratcheting up the pressure or Maxwell's demon does exist.

7 posted on 06/24/2002 8:41:01 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson