Posted on 06/24/2002 12:48:28 PM PDT by RCW2001
Bush Middle East Speech Discussion Thread
I think that was the point of the speech that we're discussing.
I hope you are on your newspapers.
Thats my line
Let him go, I want to see him in total melt down.
327 posted on 6/24/02 4:55 PM Eastern by JDelinis
As I mentioned above, he was banned for having multiple accounts.
But then, you already knew that.
account8
Account # 76572
Signup 2002-01-15
Messages 15 articles, 6 replies
Status Deleted
account11
Account # 77762
Signup 2002-02-08
Messages 3 replies
Status Banned
account12
Account # 78015
Signup 2002-02-13
Messages 37 articles, 51 replies
Status Banned
ConservativeGuy
Account # 68393
Signup 2001-09-21
Messages 107 articles, 79 replies
Status Banned
All of these were the same person. Two of these had been disposed of earlier. Two, conservativeguy and account12 were not.
From ConservativeGuy's profile:
Location: Toronto
E-mail: delinis@sianews.com
Homepage: http://www.sianews.com
ICQ#: 37933589
You can probably go for another account now that those are all gone. Oh wait, what was this? Azura2? Let me check that profile.
Location: Toronto
E-mail: delinis@sianews.com
Homepage: http://www.sianews.com
ICQ#: 37933589
Some people need gas masks. Some people need a bus ticket to Seattle. All you need is $10 -- join the Ontario Progressive Conservative Youth Association.
I am a hardcore political junkie, and am going to be Prime Minister in 2030 :)
Delinis eh? How coincidental! Just like your name. And checking your profile, I see you have an ICQ number in common too!
Location: Ontario
E-mail: delinis6086@rogers.com
ICQ#: 37933589
Where's the beef?
Azura2
Account # 77122
Signup 2002-01-27
Messages 4 articles, 47 replies
Status Banned
JDelinis
Account # 78843
Signup 2002-03-02
Messages 7 articles, 46 replies
Status Banned
All told, I think Jim just found 6 more accounts of yours. What exactly is a progressive conservative anyhow?
For all the curious, Jim said he would restore the profiles I mentioned for all to see (he can't right now due to John doing some database work).
I don't believe this is capitulation anyhow. This is Israel's war. We are simply playing the role of 'trusted advisor' to Israel- just as they did to us after 9-11.
I will go on record (as I have before about the Mideast situation) that if Bush backtracks, it will be the third thing I have vehemently disagreed with him about. But I don't think that will happen.
The Israeli authorities knew the suicide bomber's name and face beforehand but still did not stop him from carrying out his atrocious butchery. Bodies and parts of them were blown through the windows of the bus by the force of the blast. In an unprecedented move, the fat Bolshevik traitor Ariel Sharon waddled to the scene of the carnage and, in the words of one wit, "promised to take Yasser Arafat out -- for a night of dining and dancing."
jtf.org
It's okay, MM. Calling people names means you've lost the argument. There is a much wider screen than most tunnel-visioned people seem to notice. Maybe once gripe at a time is all they can handle.
Without Rush, it is likely that we would be listening to President Gore. Rush's access to exit polls showed a neck and neck election, so Rush implored, begged and pleaded with Conservatives to GO VOTE!
The pre-election polls - and nearly every thread on FR - stressed that GWB had an 'insurmountable', 'overwhelming' lead in the polls. The theory was that Gore was wooden, tied to Clinton, the 'kiss' was so staged that people would not fall for it. Those polls left many people feeling that GWB did not need their vote. Guess what? He did. I know many people who thought GWB had a lock on the election, and only voted as a result of Rush.
I don't agree with Rush on everything (though I'm hard pressed to think of some area of disagreement now), but for years he has been the ONLY face of conservatism. Rush ALWAYS says he would prefer Bush to Gore, and that includes the morphing of Bush into Gore about one issue, one time, for the purpose of making a point.
Rush is correct in his criticism of the Farm Bill and CFR. He ALWAYS reiterates his understanding that these are political not philosophical decisions; however, he correctly points out that Bush has a bully pulpit and that his constant compromise has not resulted in a 'kindler, gentler' Democratic leadership.
Rush has been subjected to the death of a thousand cuts by the Libs and is still standing. In 2004, if the economy is still a mess and the WoT is not going well, the Conservatives, Republicans, and Bush will need a friend on the airwaves, and who're they gonna call: Rush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.