Skip to comments.
Bush Middle East Speech Discussion Thread
Posted on 06/24/2002 12:48:28 PM PDT by RCW2001
Bush Middle East Speech Discussion Thread
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 1,561-1,568 next last
To: pyx
In response to your post 375, I do not equate passing a farm bill with the Middle East. Legislative compromises are governed by what the Congress wants and what can get passed.
Foreign policy is in the hands of the executive branch. Therefore he doesn't have to worry about Rats, or whether he has enough votes.
Apparently you see legislative compromise (which Reagan also believed in) as evil and "caving." I can't help you on that point...you just need to understand politics better.
I don't think the Taliban felt that President Bush compromised, and I imagine that the Palestinians are thinking long and hard.
To: Spiff
Maybe you'll like this one better then .....
442
posted on
06/24/2002 2:40:31 PM PDT
by
kayak
To: Yehuda
23:53 Prime Minister Ariel Sharon extremely pleased with Bush speech on Middle East from Ha'aretz.
Comment #444 Removed by Moderator
To: Miss Marple
They didn't see the speech, but their leaders did.
George Bush Jr. has probably told Sharon, "On my signal, unleash hell."
Clock's ticking, Arab world. It's decision time.
445
posted on
06/24/2002 2:42:11 PM PDT
by
hchutch
To: Teacher317
Nude photos of Arafat leaked to Larry Flynt?
lol
446
posted on
06/24/2002 2:42:12 PM PDT
by
Dales
To: Yehuda
23:38 Shinui chair MK Yossi Lapid: Bush speech the most Israel-friendly address ever given again from the same source.
Do you disagree with your brothers?
To: dennisw
Israel's semi-occupation is far better than an armed Palestinian state. What sense does that make? Under Oslo agreements the Pallies have been administering the West Bank and Gaza for the last number of years and have done no good for their people. PallieLand has devolved into an even worse s**thole. Arafat started his disastrous Jihad/Intifada after he walked out on Oslo negotiations.
You mean Camp David. In Oslo he signed the deal. Even shared the Nobel Prize with Peres and Rabin. The latter of course got murdered for his trouble, and not by an Arab either.
-Eric
448
posted on
06/24/2002 2:42:43 PM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: JDelinis
Actually, account12 was nuked for having multiple accounts.
To: kayak
Maybe you'll like this one better then ..... Your previous statement would be true then if it captioned this Bush/Rumsfield picture.
450
posted on
06/24/2002 2:43:29 PM PDT
by
Spiff
To: pyx
Are you calling me out? High noon? Guns or knives?
451
posted on
06/24/2002 2:44:27 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: pyx
Since it is a FACT that President Bush has in past, comprimised on policies he has presented; Why do you NOT expect President Bush to water down through comprimise with vested interests, the conditions he uses in this latest Middle-East policy announcement ? This has everything to do with the Executive Branch/State Department, and little or nothing to do with working with the Legislative Branch of our government.
To: pyx
How do I respond to this non word:
comprimised? What the hell does COMPRIMISED mean?
When you have a couple of real degrees and some real thoughts instead of posting Third Party Orphan Mantras, come back and try again.
To: AlGone2001
Did you sleep through the speech? Why do you insist on making others believe a lie? You aren't even going throught the trouble to take the president out of context. You are simply omitting all that the president actually said.Not all of us have time to dilly-dally in front of the tv set all day long...I did however, read the transcript...
But as I see it, when the Palis become disconnected with the terrorists thru their new democratic government, the suicide bombings will continue but the blame will no longer be on the Palis...
454
posted on
06/24/2002 2:46:21 PM PDT
by
Iscool
To: July 4th
The settlers are not happy though...that's for sure.
Considering that the President just ringingly endorsed the Mitchell Report as continuing US policy, I bet not. The broadcast media will probably miss that, since it doesn't lend itself to those 30 second sound bites. But the Government of Israel definitely got the message.
-Eric
455
posted on
06/24/2002 2:46:42 PM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: irgbar-man
Found in Deuteronmy 30:19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: I haven't read the speech yet. Did Bush actually quote this scripture!? Holy Crap!!! I sure wouldn't want to be a Palestinian about right now.
456
posted on
06/24/2002 2:47:16 PM PDT
by
Spiff
To: Teacher317
The Bush-lovers want to celebrate another solid speech by a solid man. Why do I feel like you're SNEERING when you type that? :-0
457
posted on
06/24/2002 2:47:18 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: RCW2001
Whether Arafat stays or goes is quite beside the point. The Palestinians want Israel's annihilation. They're backed by repressive Arab countries, like Syria, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Saudi Arabia. Egypt does their bidding as well. Bush knows full well that there's no chance the state which will border Israel will be a republic. He also knows that land for peace is a sham. It hasn't worked in the past, and it won't work in the future. Land isn't the issue. These are terrorists. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hebollah, and the rest. The President's speech was not a speech of a statesman. It was more of the same platitudes. But worst of all, it tells terrorists throughout the world that the Bush Doctrine is dead. Yes, we defeated the Taliban, but since then we've been on defense. We've not taken the steps even in our own country that are necessary to ensure our own protection -- from arming pilots, closing our borders to illegal immigrants, stopping and searching all would-be airline passengers who come from terrorist states or states like Saudi Arabia, arming pilots and co-pilots, x-raying all luggage, putting armed marshalls on all flights, etc. I think the Anerican people know what needs to be done, and they're way ahead of the politically correct leadership in Washington. The President must do more, and he must not concern himself with what the media or congressional Democrats or the Europeans think or say about him. What's right is right. It's one thing for the president to compromise his entire domestic agenda, which is bad enough. But to falter in the war on terrorism is simply intolerable. There's too much at stake.
To: Spiff
How about posting your resume so we can compare it to SOS Powell?
We are waiting!
To: Iscool
Not all of us have time to dilly-dally in front of the tv set all day long...I did however, read the transcript... Then feel free to post (in it's context)your supporting text.
I'll be waiting to take you to task.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 1,561-1,568 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson