To: theirjustdue
If law enforcement wasn't convinced dw was guilty, they wouldn't have presented the caes to the prosector.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"If law enforcement wasn't convinced dw was guilty, they wouldn't have presented the caes to the prosector. Kim, did you even bother to read what I said?
I said, I feel they are sincere in believing DW's guilty, but I feel they think the end justifies the means in this case.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim said:
"If law enforcement wasn't convinced dw was guilty, they wouldn't have presented the caes to the prosector."
Surely you don't mean that, Kim... I hate to be the one to point out to you the times "Law Enforcement" in this country has rushed to judgement, and has been tragically and horribly wrong! Maybe others can help here, for I am worried that Kim will think I am piling on, but I can't believe she meant what she typed!
613 posted on
06/24/2002 8:34:10 PM PDT by
jacquej
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Huh?
670 posted on
06/24/2002 9:30:05 PM PDT by
Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
If law enforcement wasn't convinced dw was guilty, they wouldn't have presented the caes to the prosector. Did you leave out the </sarcasm>?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson