Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
All of those other sentences are not unconstitutional as long as: 1. the judge-imposed sentence did not exceed the statutorily allowed maximum, or 2. if the sentence did surpass the maximum, it was based upon facts tried to a jury and found by a jury to exist. What the Supreme Court is saying with this decision is that any statutorily-created factors that AGGRAVATE a crime's punishment MUST be found to exist by a jury.
90 posted on 06/24/2002 10:05:42 AM PDT by ernie pantuso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: ernie pantuso
What the Supreme Court is saying with this decision is that any statutorily-created factors that AGGRAVATE a crime's punishment MUST be found to exist by a jury.

I hope your interpretation is correct.

But knowing the proclivities of lawyers and judges, I'm uneasy with where this could go.




91 posted on 06/24/2002 10:09:14 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson