To: Admin Moderator; Registered
An ignore function is like a little kid putting is fingers in his ears and going "La la la la la la I'm not listening!"
And since this is posted:
![](http://users2.ev1.net/~ibc1/images/weasels.gif)
then I must be fair and balanced:
![](http://members.aol.com/registered/private/freep/cleaninglady.jpg)
To: Sir Gawain
Great graphic, I don't think that dustpan is nearly big enough though. A couple more years of compassionate conservatism and she's likely to be driving one of these:
![](http://www.sweeprite.com/images/husky2c.jpg)
To: John Robinson; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator; tpaine; OWK; ThomasJefferson; AAABEST; Loopy; ...
An ignore function is a bad idea. But I can understand. Jim and the mods are probably getting tired of being overwhelmed by whiners that constantly hit abuse and cry because someone they don't agree with is posting to them and FR is not what
they want it to be. Too many thin skinned and immature people around here. If everyone were a) mature and b) not such crybabies, FR wouldn't need moderators.
If everyone agreed on here it would be boring as hell, to me anyway. I must question the motives of people that wish to silence or ignore dissenting voices within the conservative spectrum of thought.
To: Sir Gawain
Hard to imagine why post 164 was deleted (it can't possibly be this lovely graphic)...
![](http://members.aol.com/registered/private/freep/cleaninglady.jpg)
Graphic (apparently) by Registered
To: Sir Gawain
LOL who did this it is hilarious.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson