Skip to comments.
Mexico Wants Arizona Back (Now on Hannity & Colmbs
FoxNews ^
| 6/21/02
| FOXNEWS
Posted on 06/21/2002 6:47:57 PM PDT by Mom_Grandmother
Mexico, at least one person anyhow, wants several of our states back, they belong to Mexico. On Hannity & Colmbs Now!!!
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arizona; donutwatch; landgrab; mexico; southwest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 381-385 next last
To: evad
oops...forgot ... </sarcasm>
141
posted on
06/21/2002 8:45:36 PM PDT
by
evad
To: Nachum
"Is there are spanish word for "intifada"?" I suppose by now the answer's already materialized, but what the heck.
"La Reconquista Aztlan", comes pretty close in both word and meaning.
To: rintense
Yes, it is laughable. I sure don't take it very seriously. There is something about Fox I absolutely don't trust. Our relationship with Mexico is one of the things W and I don't see eye to eye on. I have a hard time understanding W's position given he's lived most of his life in Texas and knows firsthand the problems that desperately need to be corrected. Can I still be a Bushbot?
To: Joe Hadenuf
NOT WHILE I'M STILL HERE !!!
144
posted on
06/21/2002 8:47:40 PM PDT
by
tbird1
To: Mom_Grandmother
I just got this email response from signing a petition the other day. I assume Tancredo's petition has been all over FreeRepublic but it couldn't hurt to post this again.
Viva! Liberte!
AMERICAN PATROL JUST GOT A CALL FROM CONGRESSMAN TANCREDO¹S
OFFICE. THEY THANKED US ALL FOR OUR SUPPORT AND SENT THE
FOLLOWING PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: LARA KENNEDY
JUNE 21, 2002 (202) 226-6999
CONGRESSIONAL IMMIGRATION REFORM CAUCUS' PETITION TO
PRESIDENT OVERWHELMS WHITE HOUSE EMAIL SYSTEM
White House Inundated with Petitions; Americans Want Troops on U.S. Border
WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Representative Tom Tancredo (R-CO), Chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, today announced that the Caucus' petition urging the President to immediately deploy troops along the U.S. border has overwhelmed the White House email system.
"Perhaps the White House is finally getting the message," said Tancredo. "It's about time they realize that the people of this country justifiably feel that the U.S. border is a sieve. It poses a real threat to our security and ignoring this fact represents the most egregious evidence that the federal government is shirking its responsibility to the people of this
nation."
Since Rep. Tancredo posted the petition on Tuesday, June 11, 2002, approximately 11,403 petitions have been sent electronically to the White House. Due to the overwhelming response, the White House email system is overloaded. To sustain their email system
operations, the system is sending an auto-reply to each petition with a "service unavailable" warning.
To access the petition, please visit
http://www.house.gov/tancredo
http://www.house.gov/tancredo/ immigration
To: Joe Hadenuf
They will take Arizona without firing a shot. Thanks to your Federal government.And with the blessing of people like John McCain. I was listening to Bill O'Reilly's radio show a couple of days ago and McCain was running scared of Bill. Bill wanted him as a guest to discuss McCain's sponsorship of a bill that would cover the health costs of illegals. McCain, of course, refused to discuss the matter with O'Reilly.
I missed Hannity and Colmes tonight, but will definitely stay up for the repeat later tonight.
To: Nachum
Is there are spanish word for "intifada"? Try "mierda"
147
posted on
06/21/2002 8:51:30 PM PDT
by
tdadams
To: McLynnan
I have a hard time understanding W's position given he's lived most of his life in Texas and knows firsthand the problems that desperately need to be corrected. Can I still be a Bushbot?
No, you'll have to convince yourself of an implausible excuse for Bush's actions toward Mexico first. And it has to contradict everything you just said.
Sorry, that's how it is.
To: fuzzy122
"CONGRESSIONAL IMMIGRATION REFORM CAUCUS' PETITION TO PRESIDENT OVERWHELMS WHITE HOUSE EMAIL SYSTEM" Thank you fuzzy122, it is going to take the people, serious people, to get our president to understand where we stand on this issue. I still remember the words he used after one of his speeches, they were not his words, we all know who uttered them "LETS ROLL". I took what our president said to heart, he has got to talk to us.
To: the_right_way
Ok, Smarty-pants! And just who do you want to replace him, hmmm? Have anyone in mind? You Bush-bashers are amazing. You always wait around, sniffing these threads; waiting to find just the right article. Then you find one, perfect for bashing. But you won't propose someone to replace him. You also would have to find something to impeach him on, then have a trial. I think you'll have a problem though. Not too many people would go along with you.
You're beginning to sound like the poor, misunderstood liberals who keep on fighting the election. Life's just tough when you're a poor humble Bush-basher, Boo hoo!!!
150
posted on
06/21/2002 8:57:32 PM PDT
by
dsutah
To: Righty1
How many Americans of German descent do you suppose stayed up drinking to root for good old Germany? How many want a hyphen?This American of German descent woke up early to watch the game and rooted for the USA. In the days before the US vs. Mexico match, I saw a lot of cars around here with Go Mexico painted on them with shoe polish. I felt like taking a black marker and writing back to between those two words, lol. If they love it so much, go the hell home.
To: Sabertooth
Nope, guess I can't play then. This position on Mexico baffles and angers me. I have no problem with foreign aid to help Mexico develop economically, but do have a huge problem with an open border. I'm a fairly pragmatic person and realize there will probably never be a President who is in perfect lockstep with my personal political agenda. W and I aren't in sync on this one, but I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
To: rintense
I'm waiting to see a gang of leftist lawyers show up in the Hague, D.C., and the UN with briefcases in hand and American dollars in their Swiss accounts. I don't see a war or fighting at all. It will all be stolen in a massive litigation of some kind. That is how I think it will come down. It sounds ludicrous, but considering what has been lost in the past to 'legal' wranglings, do not be surprised.
BTW, isn't there a verse in the New Testament that says in a nutshell that God hates lawyers?
To: Johnny Crab
" cause you fought all the way, Johnny Crab Johnny Crab. You fought all the way Johnny Crab!" Oops....I mean Johnny REB!
154
posted on
06/21/2002 9:00:42 PM PDT
by
gracex7
To: Mom_Grandmother
Obviously the idiot doesn't think much of his owm people by making such a comparison.
To: Barbara14
What a war there will be if someone tries to hand over Texas to mexico! Texans take no bull from government types, and they sure are not going to hand over their land! Texas fought & won independence from Mexico. While there was some argument over the Rio Nueces vs. the line Rio Grande -Rio Bravo (del norte).
That was settled, along with cession of NM, (current) AZ and CA, in the 1848 Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty plus 15 million dollar payment for Mexican property claims.
Everything was consolidated with the Gadsden Purchase in '54 (?) The Mexican Congress ratified both the peace treaty and the purchase, their claims are zero, nothing left to talk about.
To: McLynnan
I'm a fairly pragmatic person and realize there will probably never be a President who is in perfect lockstep with my personal political agenda. W and I aren't in sync on this one, but I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Pragmatism's fine, but let me ask you a couple of questions...
Is there no way Bush could lose your vote? No position he could take where you just say "nuts to that?"
If not, if you vote is totally in the bag for him, what leverage do you have? He can ignore you and still get your vote.
Speaking for myself, I'm opposed to much of Bush's domestic agenda as outlined in his State of the Union address. I'm very opposed to his fetish for Mexico. My vote was in the bank for him, then it became his to lose. Still is, for now. But it's shakey.
California can't take another Amnesty. If he pulls that, he loses my vote.
To: Mom_Grandmother
He wants Texas, Cal., Arizona Actually, he has a better case on Cal and Az than on Texas. Texas became independent following an internal revolt of its own citizens. That has long been recognized as a legititate means of establishing a new government/nation.
Cal & Az (Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico also, I think) we TOOK from Mexico after Winfield Scott handed Santa Anna his hindquarters on a platter. Since the Mexican War was fought over the enlightened cause of manifest destiny, Mexico might just find some court willing to hear their complaint.
That court might even call for a referendum.
I don't to may Scotsdaleites or LoxAngleirons are gonna vote to be wrapped in the warm loving embrace of stout, but poverty-stricken, Mother Mexica.
158
posted on
06/21/2002 9:07:46 PM PDT
by
xzins
Comment #159 Removed by Moderator
To: Sabertooth
And Gore will be very happy to have you on his side.
160
posted on
06/21/2002 9:13:05 PM PDT
by
Lower55
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 381-385 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson