Skip to comments.
Congress calls for leak investigation: Presidential reprimand moves representatives to action
MSNBC ^
| 20 July 2002
| Andrea Mitchell, Alex Johnson
Posted on 06/20/2002 5:49:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
This in incomprehensible to me that a member of Congress leaked this information after Senators Graham and Shelby, and Reps Goss and Pelosi guaranteed there would be no leaks.
If I was with the CIA or any other Intelligence Agency, the United States Congress would be the last people I would want to brief.
1
posted on
06/20/2002 5:49:41 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: Brandonmark; Alex P. Keaton; Dog; Miss Marple; Howlin; deport; MeeknMing; rintense; Dog Gone; ...
I cannot believe they cannot even get through the first hearings without a leak by Congress. I say the Senator/Rep who leaked this should be prosecuted and removed from office!
2
posted on
06/20/2002 5:51:46 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: PhiKapMom
I'll add "and hung for treason at daybreak" to your list ...... :-)
3
posted on
06/20/2002 5:55:02 PM PDT
by
kayak
To: All
Forgot to take out the junk ads in the article from MSNBC -- I was so happy not to format that I forgot to remove!
4
posted on
06/20/2002 5:55:29 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: kayak
Very good addition! Adding Treason works for me!
5
posted on
06/20/2002 5:56:17 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: PhiKapMom
You'll note, of course, that there was no suggestion that all members of the Committee and staff take lie detector tests. Or that the DOJ haul the reporter recipients of the leaks before a Grand Jury to inquire as to their source and let them contemplate answering in jail. In short, nothing effective. But, it makes the Congress critters look good.
Jack
6
posted on
06/20/2002 5:56:37 PM PDT
by
JackOfVA
To: JackOfVA
Wouldn't rule out lie detector tests yet. With Goss livid as reported by Mitchell on MSNBC and a former CIA officer, I don't expect this one to just go away. The leaders of the two Committees promised this Administration that there would be NO leaks!
7
posted on
06/20/2002 6:00:14 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: PhiKapMom
My guess on leakers: Alcee Hastings or John Edwards. Or their staff.
I hope it is Edwards, as I would like to see him hung out to dry.
To: PhiKapMom
I was so happy not to format that I forgot to remove! ******* LOL.... All things aren't what they seem at first.
This will get interesting as I hear them scrambling on the news now trying to cover their tracks....
9
posted on
06/20/2002 6:03:41 PM PDT
by
deport
To: PhiKapMom
Wouldn't rule out lie detector tests yet. We can hope. Anyway, if you strap a Congress critter into a lie detector the machine would probably blow up.
Jack
10
posted on
06/20/2002 6:06:40 PM PDT
by
JackOfVA
To: Miss Marple
AMEN!!!If a Senator is removed from office (I know .... I'm just dreaming here!) is he/she replaced before the next election? A replacement appointed by the Gov? Can you say Erskine Bowles? YIKES!
11
posted on
06/20/2002 6:06:55 PM PDT
by
kayak
To: PhiKapMom
I cannot believe they cannot even get through the first hearings without a leak by Congress. I say the Senator/Rep who leaked this should be prosecuted and removed from office!I would have been more surprised if there hadn't been any leaks. The qualifications for office are minimal, and there have been plenty of districts that have elected rogues, idiots, or criminals. Heck, we've even voted them into the Presidency!
The question is whether we want to give a President the ability to keep secret from Congress information relating to National Security.
I'd give it to this one, but what if hillary was elected next?
To: Miss Marple
I believe Alcee Hastings was removed from the House intel committee a couple of months ago.
To: Miss Marple
I almost freaked out when I saw Hastings mentioned but he is not a member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence.
In looking at the Committee members it is fairly easy to rule out folks. Would look for someone that appears on CNN a lot and that to me also appears to be Edwards.
Was impressed with the reporting by Andrea Mitchell on this story -- she was genuinely upset that someone from this Committee had leaked.
To: PhiKapMom
Here's the beauty of this one: the FBI, who is being investigated by this committee, will now be investigatining -- tada -- THIS COMMITTEE...........har!
If we have ANY luck, it will be John Edwards!
15
posted on
06/20/2002 6:14:11 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: aristeides; PhiKapMom
I must have missed Hastings being removed. Thank goodness!
Then my bet is Edwards. I thought the leak to the Washington Post last fall was probably his. It would be just the sort of thing he would do to show how important he is.
To: Howlin
I hadn't thought about that! That is funny! Looks like a concensus is forming -- John Edwards! He can kiss running for Pres Good-Bye! He seems to be arrogant enough to do just that!
To: PhiKapMom
The White House needs to "give false info" to a variety of Reps. and Senators....alll different "TIDBITS" and then wait and see which one or ones are leaked to the media and BINGO, you'll find the TRAITOR!!
To: PhiKapMom
Where was it first reported? The leak, that is.
19
posted on
06/20/2002 6:17:18 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I see we ALL agree on who the most logical suspect is! Ha!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson