Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gunshy
Totally irrelevant? HA. This IS the case that Klayman is involved in.

And notice it WAS DISMISSED.....soemthing you do not see on Klayman's web site.

And what part of:

As to Hall's claims against Clinton, the district court held that the DOJ can represent Clinton pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s 517 because its decision to do so is either unreviewable generally or is in this case supported by "a sufficient interest to pass muster under the flexible mandate of that statute." Hall II, 143 F. Supp. 2d at 4.

don't you understand?

And, in fact, this:

Isn't Bush providing Hillary DOJ lawyers free of charge to assist in her defense.

was what you said which is NOT true; the DOJ is providing a lawyer for her because she was FIRST LADY.....they are defending the position NOT her.

172 posted on 06/20/2002 9:42:39 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
She wasn't first lady in march of 2001.
176 posted on 06/20/2002 10:10:03 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson