Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
She wasn't first lady in march of 2001.
176 posted on 06/20/2002 10:10:03 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: gunshy; Howlin
She wasn't first lady in march of 2001.

So what? She was when the questionable behavior resulting in the law suit occurred. The DOJ is defending the First Lady. As much as I and everyone else here hates the fact that she ever held that position, she held it, and that's just our tough luck this time.

You would just love to pin this on Bush, as though he's doing her some special, personal favor. Good grief. I have to wonder who pays if Clinton loses; my guess would be the taxpayers.

181 posted on 06/20/2002 10:20:48 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: gunshy
You cannot possibly be that dumb, can you? The lawsuit involves things she supposedly did WHILE she was first lady.
182 posted on 06/20/2002 10:21:23 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson