Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper
Do you have a source for that information?

She didn't ask anything about a scar, but was glad that I got the vaccination, and equally glad that I didn't get the anthrax.

The SOP in British Smallpox vaccination was to re-vaccinate if no scar appeared after a couple of weeks. The Microbiologists at the hospital I used to work at in Cambridge used to say the best indicator of Smallpox vaccination effectiveness was a scar.

This is because the Vaccinia virus used is live and should elicit a local immune response. If there is a scar you can be confident the vaccination worked. If there isn't, it may still have worked, but you can't be sure without a confirmatory test. It could be your immune system doesn't create a powerful enough response to the specific surface antigens on the virus to leave a scar. However, everyone I know who was vaccinated against Smallpox has a scar.

Its worth asking your doctor about it, perhaps the data the old British SOP was based on has now been disproved.

95 posted on 06/20/2002 8:29:31 PM PDT by David_H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: David_H
perhaps the data the old British SOP was based on has now been disproved.

HM surgeons are well respected in this house, and I will verify with my MD tomorrow. Phone calls are inexpensive. But I truly do think that there is a disconnect on the old vs. the new.

I'll make sure to either come back to this thread or freep-mail you with her response.

And thanks for your concern.

/john

97 posted on 06/20/2002 8:41:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson