Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probe Sought in Leaked Intelligence
AP Online via COMTEX ^ | JOHN J. LUMPKIN

Posted on 06/20/2002 1:33:20 PM PDT by grimalkin

WASHINGTON, Jun 20, 2002 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- The chairmen of a joint congressional committee investigating pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures said Thursday they have asked the attorney general to investigate possible leaks of classified information by the panel.

"We will cooperate with the FBI in any way possible," while the Justice Department and the FBI investigate if or how such leaks occurred, said Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

Vice President Dick Cheney had complained to the two chairmen earlier Thursday about leaks that he believed led to the disclosure of the National Security Agency's Sept. 10 intercepts of at least two messages in Arabic. The messages suggested a major event was to take place the next day.

At President Bush's direction, Cheney called Goss and Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, "to express the president's concerns about this inappropriate disclosure," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.

Fleischer called the disclosure of the language of the NSA intercepts "alarmingly specific."

Goss said the Justice Department investigation was necessary because committee members are entrusted to keep classified information secret, and undercover operatives or U.S. officials could be endangered by such leaks.

"We've got people out in harm's way who are conducting a lot of serious business," Goss said.

Fleischer called the information that the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency are providing to the committee "extraordinarily sensitive."

"The selective, inappropriate leaking of snippets of information risks undermining national security, and it risks undermining the promises made to protect this sensitive information," the White House spokesman said.

Fleischer said "we do not know who did it," but Cheney's phone call seemed to point a finger at the committees.

Concern about possible leaks has been a key reason the White House has opposed setting up an independent commission to investigate the attacks. The commission has been sought by some lawmakers and relatives of the victims.

Bush has said the intelligence panels were better positioned to avoid leak. They "understand the obligations of upholding our secrets and our sources and methods of collecting intelligence," he said last month.

But Bush has clashed with Congress before over leaks. On Oct. 5, he issued a memo limiting sensitive congressional briefings to the top leaders of the House and Senate and their intelligence committees. He dropped the restrictions a week later after getting assurances from Graham and Goss that they would rein in their members.

Fleischer did not address questions from reporters about the NSA's intercepts themselves. But he said that a 1998 leak - that American intelligence agencies were eavesdropping on Osama bin Laden's satellite phone conversations - led bin Laden to stop using that phone.

"We are in the middle of a war, and one of the ways to prevent attacks on the United States and to win the war is to be able to obtain information from our enemies," Fleischer said. If the enemy learns of U.S. capabilities, "they're going to change their methods."

The Sept. 10 intercepts were not translated until Sept. 12. Intelligence agencies aren't sure if it they were actually a warning of the attacks at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, an intelligence source said Wednesday.

Even if they were, they provided no information that authorities could have acted on, the intelligence source said. The mere mention of a time was insufficient to provide clues of what was to come, the source said.

The messages, recorded in two separate conversations, contained the phrases, "Tomorrow is zero hour," and "The match is about to begin," the intelligence source said.

The messages were believed to be recorded from telephone conversations.

A U.S. intelligence official, while declining to comment on the NSA intercepts, said a piece of raw intelligence that contains only a date provides little useful information.

The official said that both before and after Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence frequently has received threat information that consists of only a date and a vague notion something will happen - and then, nothing happens.

---

Associated Press Writer Pete Yost contributed to this report.

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN Associated Press Writer


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: arifleischer; dickcheney; intelligenceleaks; nsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Dog
I know that a lot of times, staff members will read the information/reports and pass it on to their bosses (senators and congressmen.) In this case, intelligence, I think the senators and congressman should have to actually read the reports themselves, take an oath not to reveal anything to anyone if it has a certain classification. This is only commonsense during war. I can't tell you how disgusted I am over this whole leak.
21 posted on 06/20/2002 2:24:53 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
"Fleischer called the disclosure of the language of the NSA intercepts "alarmingly specific."

READ CAREFULLY

Excuse me? Is this something that we did not know before hand? This has been widely reported. Maybe not the exact wording, but still reported. I understand the classified is classified. But nothing stated so far reveales sources and methods or exposes any of our officers. NSA just hates that "I" word. If NSA does not think people understand that it intercepts 1 to 2 million pieces of data per hour, then I think they need to do a simple Internet search by themselves. BTW, NSA is the only agency with no oversight. That could be a good thing and or a bad thing.

I think the American Public has a right to know some of these things. No they do not need to know sources and methods. No they do not need specifics that can danger our officers in the field. But some 4500 Americans are either dead or missing. To place the "Classified" stamp on everything is very suspect to me.

This release of information is laughable as a threat to national security. This chest pounding has more to do with politics than national security. Hell if this was Clinton this would be called a cover-up.

The american Public has a right to know what happened here. with some details. Not what anyone Intelligence Agency, or Politician wants them to know. How many times does this have to happen before we learn.

22 posted on 06/20/2002 2:25:08 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Do we know what news organization was first with the original leak -- that should speak volumes! I don't like Feinstein but I believe she learned her lesson along with Hatch. Edwards/Durbin seem likely to leak.

Going to be interesting since Graham promised the President there would be no leaks. Right out of the starting gates -- leaks.

23 posted on 06/20/2002 2:26:42 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Paging Senator Leaky.
24 posted on 06/20/2002 2:27:15 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
But Bush has clashed with Congress before over leaks. On Oct. 5, he issued a memo limiting sensitive congressional briefings to the top leaders of the House and Senate and their intelligence committees. He dropped the restrictions a week later after getting assurances from Graham and Goss that they would rein in their members.

I really don't understand this. Why are they not prosecuted?

Isn't it against the law?

Why can Congressmen or Senate tell secrets that would have us in jail and we knew it and told it?

Never mind, we need to move ahead, like Bush said. Nevermind what they do.

25 posted on 06/20/2002 2:28:07 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
try Patrick Leaky
26 posted on 06/20/2002 2:29:55 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Barbara Mikulski, Maryland
27 posted on 06/20/2002 2:30:43 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This is CNN...David Enshoir(sp) broke the story.
28 posted on 06/20/2002 2:31:18 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
You evidently have never worked with any classified or intelligence information. The specific wording could compromise where we got the information from and possibly lead to the death of agents in the field -- you never know. The American people DO NOT have the right to know classified or intelligence information when we have people's lives at stake. Why do you think there is such a thing as "Need to Know?" Been there, done that and classified and/or intelligence information needs to stay classified and people take the information they have to their graves! You sign an oath not to divulge classified information, and that means anyone coming in contact with it needs to keep their mouths shut! We are not talking Confidential here or For Official Use Only, but highly classified that requires special clearances to even see! People amaze me -- I wouldn't have said it was a clinton cover-up either when it comes to classified/intelligence information. Why don't we just take and open the CIA to tours so people like you can see everything they are working on and let the world know at the same time? Or how about getting on email from the CIA so we know what they are working on! (sarcasm) You see classified/intelligence information -- you zip your lips period -- Loose lips sink ships isn't just a catchy phrase! End of rant!
29 posted on 06/20/2002 2:34:32 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
Leahy was kicked off the Intelligence Committee back in the late 80's but the people of Vermont still continue to elect him!
30 posted on 06/20/2002 2:35:16 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
This is why character counts...
31 posted on 06/20/2002 2:36:06 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
So why should anybody be surprised...this will continue until someone goes to jail.
32 posted on 06/20/2002 2:36:11 PM PDT by Solid Oak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Did CNN break the original story that came out this week -- I remember commenting that I thought it was a leak of classified intelligence information. If CNN had the original story, then my guess would be Edwards who seems to be their poster boy.
33 posted on 06/20/2002 2:36:50 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The bottom line? The Dem's don't care how many Americans die, as long as they make Bush and the military look bad and win control of Congress. For us to expect any more from them is foolish.
34 posted on 06/20/2002 2:37:23 PM PDT by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PoppingSmoke
I would agree with you most times.... but not on this one. Bin Laden is quoted as saying a few years ago that he stopped using a sat phone when he found out we were listening in to his calls...

One of these primadonas trying to impress the cocktail party set needs to see the inside of Leavenworth because of this leak....

35 posted on 06/20/2002 2:37:24 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KSCITYBOY
Re#20 Yep. Sick and sad...
36 posted on 06/20/2002 2:42:10 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
. The specific wording could compromise where we got the information from and possibly lead to the death of agents in the field -- you never know.

Then why were the leakers not found and prosecuted?

Just move on?

37 posted on 06/20/2002 2:42:27 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Letting them know the exact text and time tell the emery which messages we got.That was stupid.
38 posted on 06/20/2002 2:43:29 PM PDT by not-alone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
If Bush and Cheney were not able to taint the classified information so they could trace leaks, they should make the Democrats think they did. F around a little with the Rat's minds.
39 posted on 06/20/2002 2:43:45 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
And here's another question: why didn't the media ask before they aired this stuff in the first place??

Have they forgotten just why it was UBL stopped using his cell/satellite phone (I forget which it was).

40 posted on 06/20/2002 2:45:45 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson