Skip to comments.
Too bad liberals can't confront evil
www.townhall.com ^
| 6/17/2002
| Don Feder
Posted on 06/19/2002 2:02:49 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Must be all that OXYDON "doctor perscribed"!!!
To: fight_truth_decay
Correct me if I am mistaken, but Sum All Fear is based on a Clancy novel. We all know what Mr.Clancy's politics are.
2
posted on
06/19/2002 2:07:37 PM PDT
by
Pal10523
To: Pal10523
Yet neo-Nazis have become a Hollywood staple. The new movie "The Sum of All Fears" involves a billionaire Austrian industrialist who sets off a nuclear device in Baltimore to start a war between America and Russia, so European fascists can take over the world. Interestingly enough, in the novel the villains with the bomb are Islamic fundamentalists. Clancy was an executive producer of the movie. He changed the villains for PC purposes, obviously. He has gone over to the Dark Side. There is no hope for him now. He has his $500,000,000.00. What else does he need?
To: fight_truth_decay
Liberals don't get it because they deny evil exists - all cultures are equal in their diversity-clouded eyes. They are a pathetically confused lot, but the worst part is, they don't realize it! They really believe in their proud utopian hearts that people are basically good! All I can do is shake my head and sigh.
4
posted on
06/19/2002 2:13:54 PM PDT
by
exmarine
To: Pal10523
He's actually very conservative. The movie has absolutely no relation with the book, other than (a) the title, and (b) there's a nuclear explosion. The hollyweird folks changed everything else.
:) ttt
5
posted on
06/19/2002 2:19:08 PM PDT
by
detsaoT
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Clancy had no part in the production of the movie. According to statements he's made in the past, when he sells the rights to one of his books, he absolves himself of any part in the production, or of any say in the way the movie is made. I don't recall the reasoning behind this exactly, but I think it had something to do with how busy he is writing (or managing) books.
:) ttt
6
posted on
06/19/2002 2:20:33 PM PDT
by
detsaoT
To: Pal10523
When Tom Clancy wrote Sum of All Fears, the bomb was built and detonated by Arabs. Hollywood changed it to Nazis for the movie version.
To: detsaoT
Clancy had no part in the production of the movie. All I can tell you is, when the credits roll at the beginning of the movie, Clancy is credited as the Executive Producer. That means he bankrolled the production. I think the statements he made in the past are now in the past in more ways than one.
To: detsaoT
To: fight_truth_decay
Such is understandable, considering that blood-sucking vampires are deathly afraid of mirrors.....
10
posted on
06/19/2002 2:37:26 PM PDT
by
tracer
To: Klein-Bottle
And wasn't it set off in the football field in Denver?
11
posted on
06/19/2002 2:38:23 PM PDT
by
Lyndal
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Being Executive Producer on a film means nothing. The Producer gets the money, finds the talent, and puts the whole deal together. People who are listed as Executive Producer are generally just getting a vanity boost.
12
posted on
06/19/2002 2:44:39 PM PDT
by
mushroom
To: mushroom
Why would Clancy need a vanity boost? I don't buy the "hands off" thing. Sorry. I believe Clancy was an accomplice at sanitizing the movie.
To: Lyndal
And wasn't it set off in the football field in Denver?Yes in the book it was, I haven't seen the movie yet, but from what I hear I may just wait till it comes on video , and then wait till my local library gets it. If you haven't already done so, read the book. I found it a little slow in the middle but it picks up at the end. Very close to what's going on today considering it came out in the early 90s.
To: Pal10523
Sum of All Fears was a great book. The villians were islamists and an American Indian Movement terrorist. Hardly PC.
The movie shares the title and a few plot points, but is very different.
To: exmarine
Liberals don't get it because they deny evil exists.Sure liberals see "evil". Ever hear them call Republicans "Nazis" on the congressional floor? Ever hear them talk about people "starving children" and "stealing money from old people"?
They don't see the North Koreans, Chi-Coms, or muslim dicatorships as a threat to their political survival.
16
posted on
06/19/2002 3:44:31 PM PDT
by
weegee
To: Lyndal
And wasn't it set off in the football field in Denver? Actually in the parking lot. The bomb in the book is a fizzle, and only partly destroys the stadium. Many inside the stadium survive.
17
posted on
06/19/2002 3:50:01 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: fight_truth_decay
18
posted on
06/19/2002 3:55:16 PM PDT
by
archy
To: YankeeReb; Lyndal
And wasn't it set off in the football field in Denver? Yes in the book it was, I haven't seen the movie yet, but from what I hear I may just wait till it comes on video , and then wait till my local library gets it. If you haven't already done so, read the book. I found it a little slow in the middle but it picks up at the end. Very close to what's going on today considering it came out in the early 90s.
It came out in the 1990s, yes- but *borrowed* rather heavily from one from way back in 1975. And in the aftermath of the Olympic Massacre at Munich in 1972, the terrorists' Quisling friends in Hollywood hadn't all gotten on their knees yet.
19
posted on
06/19/2002 4:01:44 PM PDT
by
archy
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson