Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hunble
Sir, your argument is ONLY valid if a fat person displaces another passenger and they were not allowed to fly.

Wrong. My argument is 100% valid all the time. People should pay for what they use. If they use 2 seats, they ought to pay for it, period.

Your argument is wrong 100% of the time. Using YOUR logic, if there's an empty seat on a plane, I should be able to fly free since "no one else is going to use it." That's the entire crux of the fat person's argument in this case.

Case closed.

252 posted on 06/19/2002 1:36:24 PM PDT by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative
Using YOUR logic, if there's an empty seat on a plane, I should be able to fly free since "no one else is going to use it." That's the entire crux of the fat person's argument in this case.

Game. Set. Match.

256 posted on 06/19/2002 1:40:56 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: usconservative; NittanyLion
Well stated!

I was thinking along the lines of leasing a small apartment and trying to fill it with furniture from a four bedroom house. Instead of renting storage facilities for the excess furniture, I would tear down the wall into the neighbor's apartment and put some furniture in there.

If they don't like it, they can move. :o)

267 posted on 06/19/2002 2:38:24 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: usconservative
bingo
292 posted on 06/19/2002 9:17:53 PM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson